User talk:Jtrah34/sandbox

Jtrah34 Industry and Business: -	For the second sentence, you used the word unfortunately, which makes it sound like an opinion. -	For this sentence: Discrepancies often occur between qualities of leaders and qualities of women as leaders. Maybe write it as discrepancies often occur between qualities of leaders and women as leaders. -	For the second paragraph, last sentence: you should consider changing women most likely aren’t. (Sounds misleading) -

The Glass Ceiling: -	Try to break up some of these sentences so they are not run on sentences. -	You can use semicolons to break up ideas -	I would change “This is a large reason” to something like immense reason or vast reason -	For the last paragraph first sentence: You repeated a sentence which should be taken out which was “it is still necessary to identify and rectify why women are not gaining leadership positions, even though equal pay for equal work exists.

Example of Success: -	For this section you have also repeated a lot of what you talked about during the Industry and Business topic. -	I would find something else to talk about so that there is no repetition in your edits.

2620:105:B00B:4125:69C0:904E:6C7B:5834 (talk) 14:50, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Jtrah34

“Many people are aware of the fact that men generally get the top positions in the business world, but don’t understand the reasoning [reason] behind it”.

“Based off of this research [maybe say something like “according to the research conducted by ……]”, women most likely aren’t advancing in top positions in businesses because of the past societal norms that are still rooted in our society today about gender equality”.

“Based off of this research, women most likely aren’t advancing in top positions in businesses because of the past societal norms that are still rooted in our society today about gender equality” [See comment from sentence above]

“This is a large reason why a lot of women do no chase after positions of power because of a lack of self-worth brought on by gender stereotypes and inequalities”. For the example of success, to stay more neutral I think you should incorporate some examples related to men’s success so that way readers can see you are talking on both sides and not being biased even if your main focus is on women.

Overall, I believe there was no much problem with neutrality. There was no flowery language. Article was free of slangs. The structure of the article was clear and precise. Good use of research here but you will need to be more specific when citing the source [based off this research]. This article was balanced.

Amarayam (talk) 14:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Grading Question
Jtrah34 - is everything y'all wrote in the sandbox? I know some (if not all) is still in the mainspace which is great! but I wanted to make sure that there wasn't any content I was missing when I was looking at your sandbox. Transunicorn (talk) 23:09, 28 November 2015 (UTC)