User talk:Jtylek

Epesi BIM
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Epesi BIM, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.epesibim.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:46, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Epesi BIM
A tag has been placed on Epesi BIM, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Twinzor (talk) 13:49, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

RE: epesiBIM
I've restored it in accordance with the proposed deletion policy. If the article does not meet notability guidelines there is a chance it could be deleted again. - Rjd0060 (talk) 22:11, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Epesi CRM


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Epesi CRM requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  — PinkAmpers  &#38;  ( Je vous invite à me parler )  13:30, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Singularitarianizm
Hello Jtylek,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Singularitarianizm for deletion, because it doesn't seem to have any encyclopedic content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 05:48, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. —asparagusus  (interaction)  sprouts!  14:47, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Epesi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Epesi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Epesi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. —asparagusus  (interaction)  sprouts!  14:47, 5 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Please do not delete the article.
 * This is Janusz Tylek, founder of the Epesi project working on it since 2006 as a way to pay back open source community and especially developers who gave birth to Linux, PHP, MySQL and countless other great software.
 * I will update it and ask for review to conform to community guidelines.
 * Epesi is free and open source software used by hundreds of organizations worldwide. We barely survive and struggle to provide updates to users for over 15 years now. Please note that approx. 80 percent of open source projects fail within a year. Lack of time and funding for the project, which is so common in FOSS world, is also a reason why the article has not been updated or better written. I see a conflict of interest in one public service project like Wikipedia not supporting other public service projects like Epesi released under MIT license, one of a very few applications running on LAMP stack that does not require a licensing module, monthly subscriptions etc. We have users with installations over 10 and 15 years old serving practically every business sector.
 * Maybe a prove of it's worthiness will be a fact that University of Engineering and Technology in Hanoi, Vietnam, is using Epesi CRM apparently as SIS (Student Information System), however without providing a required credit, thus illegally
 * [Https://student.uet.vnu.edu.vn/ https://student.uet.vnu.edu.vn/]
 * To compare reload the page and compare the source code for Epesi CRM demo:
 * https://en.demo.epesicrm.com/
 * Many developers used Epesi CRM as a kickstarter for very elaborate ERP applications like:
 * [Https://xsystems.io/ https://xsystems.io/]
 * which was created by Georgi Hristov, Epesi contributor on Github.
 * I will remove all references and phrases that seem like a promotion or advertising. But please do not delete the article as Epesi is referenced in some scientific literature regarding FOSS ERP - here are two examples:
 * [Open_Source_Enterprise_Software]
 * [Open_Source_ERP_Systeme]
 * Removal of the page will be a great disfavor to potential users who can benefit from the software, who are predominantly small business owners and startups trying to come up with their own, home grown solutions. Our mission at Epesi is what I am doing professionally for over 30 years - making it easy for them.
 * With Regards,
 * Janusz Tylek
 * Epesi CRM project maintainer
 * P.S. I supported financially Wikipedia multiple times with donations in hundreds of dollars. I was under impression that Wikipedia's mission and goals and Epesi's are aligned and on the same supportive course. Jtylek (talk) 17:48, 5 October 2023 (UTC)