User talk:Jtzikas

Speedy deletion nomination of Flying Donut
Hello Jtzikas,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Flying Donut for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 16:10, 31 May 2013 (UTC)


 * If it is important as you claim it is, please provide 3rd party links. Links to the website itself are not very good.  Barney the barney barney (talk) 16:23, 31 May 2013 (UTC)


 * A blog would be a start, but since anyone can write a blog (and anyone can get it wrong); more substantial editorially-controlled coverage would be better. Trade magazine coverage for example.  Sources don't have to be on the internet, and they don't have to be paper.  Also remember the legal implications of writing about things you are closely connected with per WP:COI. Barney the barney barney (talk) 16:30, 31 May 2013 (UTC)


 * You can create it @ User:Jtzikas/Flying Donut and then move it into the namespace via the WP:AFC process.  Barney the barney barney (talk) 16:54, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Flying Donut
Hello Jtzikas,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Flying Donut for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 10:52, 12 October 2013 (UTC)


 * At the moment, I do have a little sympathy, even though I suspect you're trying to promote the product. Please provide additional 3rd party sources.  Non-English sources are OK, as are sources that are off-Internet. Barney the barney barney (talk) 11:11, 12 October 2013 (UTC)


 * My suggestion is that you submit it via WP:AFC, where it will be reviewed. I have my doubts about this one but it's not an area I am particularly knowledgeable about.  Perhaps there are editors more familiar with this sort of thing. Barney the barney barney (talk) 11:40, 12 October 2013 (UTC)