User talk:Ju13serv/Facebook-Cambridge Analytica data scandal/Bibliograpy

Peer Review
1. The introduction is very thorough and informative, however I believe the team could improve on the overall tone of the writing (taking away overly descriptive languages and words to maintain a more neutral tone). 2. Personally, I feel as though the headlines of the articles do not describe the content effectively (especially process & characteristic of data) - could consider rephrasing them to match the content or change the content to match the headlines. 3. The impact on users section could be improved/expanded upon, since that is something that people consider when thinking about this scandal (market size of people impacted, lasting effects). 4. I would be interested in knowing the current ongoing debate/policies/legislation update on how data will be considered in the future/how it's been considered thus far by the government.