User talk:JuJube/Archive2008Jan-Jul

Message
I just received a message from you and I have no clue what it is about? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.216.121.120 (talk) 22:48, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Johnny Spasm here. I'm new to the whole Wikipedia thing. In fact, I'm not even sure if I'm doing this right. I've uploaded 2 images onto Wikipedia that keep getting removed because they potentially violate copyright laws. I assure you that they do not as I own both images myself. I also keep having the articles I wrote either deleted or removed entirely for the same reason. In both cases, I wrote part of the material myself, and part of it is NRLCA owned. And as an officer in the NRLCA and union representative, I have permission to rewrite that material —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnny Spasm (talk • contribs) 11:56, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Noted
I completely understand and I apologize for anything just trying to figure this whole thing out any help would be greatly appreciated. From the looks of your work you are very knowledgable and I am simply a pawn in your kingdom let me know if you have any spare time to give me some advice. ThanksSandman921 (talk)

omg
what do i have do. i said i was sorry can u please stop sending me warnings. i didnt attack u all i did was say sorry can u please stop im sorry ok

Satan
I will take your advisement regarding large quantity editorialisms to heart. I was a bit rash in editing and will consult historical discussions in future before drastic. --Imagemonth (talk) 14:38, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Bao Yueqiao
I'm editing Bao Yueqiao step by step, please do not put on tag so quickly, it made a lot of editing conflicts —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Needham (talk • contribs) 14:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I see now, thanks! (Alex Needham (talk) 14:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC))

License tagging for Image:Gashbell1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gashbell1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

lol
you couldnt even come up with the birthdate or David Roback, and you say this is wikipedia. you cant provide information about band's history or influences. then you say this is wikipedia. you Changed the definition? or what ? alrite man. i'll quit. its your website, take care of it. no issues, no worries, i really dont need to care you know...

look @ hope's picture
she looks like a devil to be serious. whats d problem with that nice picture i put. now u gunna tell me that i should go over to her place in bay area and click her photograph den put it up?

hey
so u like naruto n oder anime stuff...dats cool. my fav is dragonball :D. have a nice day, n sorry for previously troubling you :p

Re: Dhalsim and M. Bison...
Both characters have appeared in an anime/anime film made in Japan. Hence, my reason for doing that is so. The anime/manga categories are made for characters who have appeared in an anime, manga, or both. Is this understandable?  ~ I&#39;m anonymous
 * I see what you mean. If their origin is from a video game then they're in the fictional character cats., regardless. By the way, I've been populating Category:Anime and manga characters who can teleport. Perhaps you can assist me?  ~ I&#39;m anonymous
 * Heads up: I've gotten all the anime/manga characters I was able to find within Category:Fictional characters who can teleport. I'm done with that albeit is there someone in Zatch Bell! that can teleport?  ~ I&#39;m anonymous
 * Hey, you never got back at responding to me. Are there any more characters in Zatch Bell! with super powers, such as teleporting or super strength/speed? From what I remember vaguely from the show was that they used magic and spells for whatever the reason; other than that, I couldn't find anything about powers and abilities for them. Could you help me out?  ~ I&#39;m anonymous

Heritage
I am Colombian too!But I live in USA.

Deletion of Nathan Blubaugh
I was not creating this page for myself. I am not Nathan Blubaugh. He is a college student who just recieved an award. I did not realize I deleted the tab and was breaking wikipedia procedures. I am also at awe as to how unfriendly wikipedia is to new users.

[Tablemajor]

Pornotheism is real
Pornotheism is real. I am a convert to it. If you do not accept it that I will make sure that Wikipedia will.

Shun Goku Satsu Morrigan's taunt
This was not worth noting? Thanks, CarpD 5/22/07.
 * OK, just wondering. Thanks, CarpD 5/24/07.

Why is my pst nonsense?
Hi jujube why is my post nonsesnse it was about MS-DOS and i was going to tell readers about some commands and what they do why was that nonsense? Plz reply

Thanks Madusha Adasooriya (Gamingnews)

Shun Goku Satsu, Evil Ryu
'In the Street Fighter Alpha series, there is a selectable version of Ryu called Evil Ryu known in Japan as Satsui no Hadou ni Mezameta RyÅ«. He was originally introduced in a Street Fighter Zero manga series authored by Masahiko Nakahira and later adapted in the Street Fighter canon by Capcom. He is the version of Ryu should he succumb to Satsui no Hadou, and depicts Ryu's struggle to resist the urge. Gameplay-wise, Evil Ryu has more powerful attacks than the original, strikes faster and possesses some of the attacks of Akuma (such as the Shun Goku Satsu). The only time Evil Ryu actually appears in Street Fighter canon is at the end of the first World Warrior tournament. According to the Street Fighter Alpha series, Sagat, the defending champion, crushed Ryu, and then extended his hand to help Ryu up after thinking that he had won. Ryu was so consumed with the desire to win that he gave into the Satsui no Hadou and executed a Metsu Shoryuken, scarring Sagat's chest and his pride.

Like Akuma, Evil Ryu has a signature symbol that appears when he performs the Shun Goku Satsu.

'he is freakin canon so just let it go. admit your wrong.'

Hi!


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Unblocking
Please can I unblock people/ I wanna make people happy that's all.

Re: anon
I disagree about your definition of a content dispute, but it does look like the anon is engaging in slow-motion edit warring. I'll give another admin a chance to look at it. east. 718 at 02:33, November 18, 2007

Re: Whoops
And I didn't realize that you didn't report him twice. :) You should follow the steps outlined in WP:DR. east. 718 at 05:30, December 15, 2007

Crispus Attucks Communication and Writing Magnet School
Hi, I fully understand your delete recommendation at Articles for deletion/Crispus Attucks Communication and Writing Magnet School because the page was in bad shape. However, it has now been rewritten with many references to establish compliance with WP:N. I wonder if you would be good enough to revisit your recommendation, please?

Happy new year !
=D Master Bigode (talk) 02:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

I think I am having a nervese break down
Will go see User:Mr-Natural-Health. Igor Berger (talk) 09:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Guilty Gear statistics

 * I'm a big fan of cleaning up character articles, but I'm curious why you removed the statistics stuff from these articles, as they're relatively easy to verify (even if they are cruft). However, I'm kind of hoping for a good reason because then I can remove the much debated cruft from the Street Fighter articles, too. ^_^ JuJube (talk) 09:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I was all for the "theme songs" section in the infoboxes until it just got to the point where some characters (Sol Badguy for one) had like 8 songs associated with them and it was getting too cluttered. And blood type has always been rather trivial. So all that was left of any worth was birthplace. Now Template:Guilty Gear character is so feeble it should probably be replaced with something more generic. Over at the SF articles, I'd say that Birthplace and Fighting style are the only too in-game sections of the infobox that need to be kept.--SeizureDog (talk) 20:33, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD question: Recombinant text
I have very little experience in AfD matters, and am asking for your input before nominating an article for deletion, because, quite frankly, I do not want to be seen as someone who capriciously nominates articles which do not meet AfD standards.

If you have time, please take a look at this article. It was created by the person who—as the intro asserts—is the very person who coined the term. Most of the edits are by that person. Most, if not all, of the sources link back to this person. I mean, at best it appears to me to constitute OR, at worst, self-promotion. But maybe I'm seeing it wrong. What do you think?

I selected you and many other editors pretty much completely at random; I picked one day's AfD archives, and clicked on the talk pages of the first two or three dozen editors' talk pages I came across. I hope that in using this selection method, I will get editors who are well-versed in AfD policies, yet who also represent a good cross-section of AfD philosophies. I will monitor your talk page for your response. Thanks. Unschool (talk) 07:08, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Merging Sailor Crystal into Sailor Senshi?
Hi JuJube, I just thought I'd drop you a note to say that as part of the "let's make this look more notable" reorganisation of Sailor Senshi, I've proposed that Sailor Crystal be merged into it, as the Sailor Crystal kind of makes a Sailor Senshi. I seem to remember that you were particularly proud of the Sailor Crystal article, so I thought I'd let you know directly. :) -Malkinann (talk) 03:28, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Martin Lukes and Creovation
How did Creovation get even nominated for deletion let alone agreed for deletion? That's crazy! Check it: Google search ElectricRay (talk) 16:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)


 * dude you clearly don't read the FT, do you? Just because you've never heard of it, if others see it as valuable (trust me - it's part of the lexicon of the city of London as a result of the FT), then why delete? Anyhow, just wanted to point that out. ElectricRay (talk) 18:32, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * jujube - fyi the demise of Martin Lukes today warranted an entire page of coverage in the print edition, an editorial in the print edition and a video Q&A on the FT site. CreovationTM (and IntegethicsTM) is prominently mentioned throughout. I think that's plenty notable enough to justify an article.ElectricRay (talk) 13:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Moving and partolling
Hi, JuJube. I see your name a lot on new page patrol and AfD, seems you are doing plenty of good work there. I'd like to ask you though, could you make sure you mark pages as patrolled before you move them. They are a proverbial bitch to mark patrolled after they have been turned into a redirect. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:40, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Telemann ...
I have now looked further into it, checked a couple of archives, can't find anything about it. The author was given a chance to expand and they didn't. I have also salted it. Thanks for poking me! Woody (talk) 13:06, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * By the way, not a vanity article, see Georg Telemann. Woody (talk) 15:59, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Ruth Fowler (Writer)
Hey there!

Call me crazy but I have a feeling that the anonymous IP who removed the speedy tag twice will remove your tag again. I wouldn't be surprised if the subject of the article isn't the person doing that. Since nothing is stopping them from removing that speedy notice, maybe you should put up the article for an AFD debate. That way the nomination can't be deleted and I'm pretty certain it's going to end up being deleted. I fail to see any notability and I will definitely vote delete if I get the chance. Something to think about. Peace! SWik78 (talk) 14:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

RE:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mapulane Surnames
The articles are already deleted! Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 03:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

BKD llp
I added some references to BKD llp. I think the article is better now. --Eastmain (talk) 01:41, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Regarding List of beatmania games
You moved List of beatmania games to List of Beatmania games. Unfortunately, the correct spelling of the title is, in fact, with a lower-case b. I have moved it back to the former title, and will be watching the page, as I created it, and am probably more familiar with the series than you are. Please do not move the article without discussing doing so on the article's talk page in the future. Thanks. Phuzion (talk) 12:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Rollback
Hello JuJube, I have granted rollback rights to your account. The reason for this is that, after a review of some of your contributions, I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended use of reverting vandalism: I do not believe you will abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see New admin school/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck. Acalamari 04:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. :) Yes, there is no confirmation screen with rollback: it just reverts the edit, which is why you have to be careful with rollback, but since you do a lot of vandal-fighting, rollback will be a big help to you. :) Good luck. Acalamari 19:16, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Character Prods
Like I said to WhisperToMe, there's exactly three users who care about the Yugioh pages around anymore. If the pages go to AfD, they're gone. The Clawed One (talk) 06:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Question
Why did you use rollback on the following edits?

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alexis_Rhodes&diff=prev&oldid=185806599

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adrian_Gecko&diff=prev&oldid=185806581

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Blair_Flannigan&diff=prev&oldid=185806545

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chazz_Princeton&diff=prev&oldid=185806524

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chumley_Huffington&diff=prev&oldid=185806499

Remember that rollback is for vandalism-reversion only, not to revert good-faith edits, or legitimate PROD or AfD templates. Acalamari 19:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I would appreciate a response to this. Thanks. Acalamari 21:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * No worries. Thank you for the response. I wasn't about to remove your rollback rights over one event: I just wanted an explanation. You made a mistake, and you realize that. No harm done then. Thanks. Acalamari 23:38, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Yu-Gi-Oh! GX media and release information
I'm uploading some images and putting them on the Yu-Gi-Oh! GX media and release information page as galleries. Yu-Gi-Oh! GX media and release information —Preceding unsigned comment added by Princessthunder (talk • contribs) 20:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Improper MfD nomination
Thanks, JuJube. I'll remember that in the future. PeterSymonds | talk  18:40, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

x-posted
I already posted this in response to your comment in a DRV, but please remember to WP:AGF. As I indicated [in the DVR request], when I created this category, I was unaware of the previous CFD. To say that I 'ignored the fact' and simply 'recreated the page in defiance' is NOT AFG--especially when I explicitly state otherwise. Plus, I am ultimately, contesting the ORIGINAL CFD, not the G4 Speedy.Balloonman (talk) 10:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Chumley Huffington
Be my guest, I'm a bit busy IRL at the moment! Thanks,  BLACK KITE  19:02, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

VirtualDub
Agreed. Made the change accordingly. -Grossmisconduct (talk) 02:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

the non/speedy
the album itself needs to asert notability, and that doesn't. which it can't as it's not released yet. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 01:33, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

List of Guns from James Bond: Nightfire
I've reverted it to its blank state and added the db-author tag. I think a lot of newbies thinking that deleting the page gets rid of it. Easier than leaving the prod in place. Thanks! gb (t, c) 18:45, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

deletion of joe mclaughlin
why did you delete my page? i work for the same publication, and in southampton he is well known, and if you would have given me time, i could easily have updated the page to include the extra information that was apparently missing —Preceding unsigned comment added by MrTTT (talk • contribs) 19:17, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Keys/Kiess and Gurabu/Grubb
The main Gash subbing/translating site, anime-destiny, and all other groups related to it refer to them as the former. There aren't any English versions of their names, so your argument is null and void.Buh6173 (talk) 21:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

All right...though that still doesn't mean it needs to be romanized as Kiess. Each one has equal right, so you can't bitch and moan when I change it.

Muzza
I found some stuff on the page for the Muzza Canal, in Italy, which I've deleted now.

You admonished the author on 22 Sept 2006 for re-creating deleted articles, but there’s also a link there to an existing article that post-dates it.

I was curious; can you shed any light on this? Do you know why was it deleted in the first place? (The current article seems OK’ish).

It doesn't matter if not, it isn't desperately important.

Xyl 54 (talk) 11:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Marking patrolled pages
I notice that you recently proposed an article for speedy deletion. It will help if you also mark the article as patrolled so that other editors do not waste their time checking the same article. Thanks, WWGB (talk) 07:39, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Marvel vs. Capcom (series)
Good job! *high five* --- Silent RAGE!  10:26, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Orochimaru
Ok, understood. Thanks for explaining me.Tintor2 (talk) 22:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

A quick note
Hey JuJube, thanks for helping revert the vandalism on East718's page, it is appreciated. However, edit summaries like the one you left aren't really constructive. Would you mind trying a little harder to stay civil? Thank you. GlassCobra 07:26, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...
Thanks for the note on my talk page - it is appreciated. That article has been the source of no end of displeasure for me over the past few months. I've no particular interest in the subject, but ended up there because of an editor (User:EverybodyHatesChris) who was evading an indefinite block with a series of sockpuppets. Sadly, I suspect that this string of rapidly changing IPs is the same editor, based on the editing patterns, the abusive language directed towards me, and the way he responded to your comment. Please let me know if you have any problems with him, as he has a tendency to stalk people who "offend" him. (I've been attacked through a false "Ckatz" page on Yahoo... and he really cut loose in a similar fashion against an editor on Wiktionary who cleaned up his vandalism of my page there.) Cheers. --Ckatz chat spy  23:50, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Judge Judy
The page blankings do not appear to be vandalism at all, rather this is a content dispute, and while the IP address repeatedly attempts to explain the reasoning behind their edits, you are using the rollback function to revert what appears to be a good faith edit. The article has been fully protected. Please take it to the talk page and hammer out a consensus with the IP user in question. I will be asking them to do the same --Jayron32. talk . contribs 17:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * If you could provide evidence as such, I would consider blocking the IP addresses in question and removing article protection. There is nothing in the edits themselves that shows obvious bad faith in themselves, but if you have proof that this is a blocked user evading their block, please provide difs so that I may act appropriately.  --Jayron32. talk . contribs  17:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

UAA
Another comment here would be appreciated. - Revolving Bugbear  18:13, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD
You really do need to explain what this "Keep per ArbCom" vote means. Because at the moment it is a perfect example of why the ArbCom injunction is wrong. Black Kite 19:50, 16 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi - I'm not having a go at you, it's not a problem if you want to vote Keep; it's just a problem if your vote seems to indicate that the ArbCom injunction suggests that others should do so too. I think this is the problematic point - I have reworded the FICTWARN template so that it is clearer too.  Hope this helps, Black Kite 20:10, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Yu-Gi-Oh! Trading Card Game Controversy
How in the hell was the removal of the decidedly uncontroversial and pointless "Most Commonly-Used Types of Card Formations" (which just explains that people have different tastes in deck strategies and is in no way a controversy in the game) with an explanation of the split between OCG and TCG and Konami's recent and very well known AND controversial attempts to steer the game towards a beatdown/destruction only meta, and their practice of creating then dropping new, and ignoring old deck types, biased? Have you even played the game, or talked with any actual duelists? It's not biased, it's fact, and as a duelist, I'm insulted that you think that the fact that "this duelist likes the Crystal Beasts, while this other one likes Volcanic Burn" is more of a legitimate "controversy" in the game than the OCG vs. TCG fan (and now distributor) war, and Konami's practices with new decktypes and the ban list. 66.233.188.231 (talk) 20:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


 * It may have been "neutral", but it is not controversial in the least, and it has the same amount of "research" as you claim my articles had. Again, what the hell is so controversial about one duelist liking one deck, and someone else liking another? Aside from the flame wars I keep on encountering whenever someone mentions the Elemental Heroes in a YGO forum, I see absolutely no arguments or controversy over the fact that different people like dueling with different decks, at all.

Also, how in the hell did my articles "smack of bias"? The OCG vs. TCG war has been known and debated for years by fans of the game, and UDE themselves have admitted that the recent changes they made to the TCG was to distance it from the OCG. And again, anyone with eyes that plays the game can see what Konami is doing to the game, recently, and there has been MANY complaints from the fans about it. I'm sorry, but I don't see how my articles are "original research" or "biased", especially when I wrote them to be as UNbiased as possible. 66.233.188.231 (talk) 21:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

A515 road (Northern Ireland)
Hi. I saw you just added a cleanup tag and i was wondering how much more can the article be cleaned up? Eddie6705 (talk) 20:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I 'll have go at that. Eddie6705 (talk) 20:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Daecaunt
Your PROD was removed by the author - you may need to take this to AfD - Fritzpoll (talk) 23:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

William Giles
I agree that the article should be deleted. Since someone removed the prod though, it has to go through the full AFD process. Would you mind doing it? I'm a little busy at the moment.  TJ   Spyke   09:12, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Advice
Hay i knwo oyu had got ygo gx locked down to non users, can you tell me how i can get a page lcoked down completely i have someoen who keeps putting false information on a page without evening wanting ot provide a source so i liek to get the page locked —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewcrawford (talk • contribs) 18:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Ezra Jampole
I was just coming back from a Google search to put an afd tag on the article and found you had beaten me to it. I couldn't find anything notable about him, either. :)  Corvus cornix  talk  23:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Sock puppets of banned user
See WP:SSP/Miamiboyzinhere regarding a user you've likely warned today for disruptive edits under an IP address. &#151;Whoville (talk) 00:24, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

db-spam -> db-advert
I've replied to your comment on my talk page. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 10:49, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

List of characters in The Simpsons by MBTI type AFD
Best AfD comment, ever. :D SGGH speak! 21:24, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

List of Major Characters in Yu-Gi-Oh! GX
I'm sorry, I have to decline your offer to help build the page, as I feel that making the list page was a bad idea as it will encourage other users to drastically shorten the former articles, making wikipedia less authoritative (besides on the issue of the source, I always get my info from Janime, and I am aware that many others do as well, but I'm not sure that's authoritative enough to list...). However, I am willing to help make the page if I can be sure that this is not true... Yalens talk 16:35, February 2008 —Preceding comment was added at 21:38, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Gone HH
He's a sock all right, but I don't think he's the previous sockpuppet of BA4. I'm fairly sure where he came from, but I don't want to feed the trolls. Snowfire51 (talk) 06:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Art in Ruins
Hi JuJube. In your AfD nomination, you mentioned this article had been speedied before. Do you have a reference for that? I didn't see it in the deletion log, so perhaps it was under a different name.

Art in Ruins is mentioned very briefly in a normal-looking WP article at Stewart Home. I wouldn't mind if an AiR article survived that was of at least that caliber, but what is being proposed doesn't sound acceptable. EdJohnston (talk) 21:11, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * See the rewritten version of the article, which in my view is a lot better. I'm switching to Keep. See what you think. EdJohnston (talk) 03:22, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

GRRRR!
A good chunk of our data comes from sites like the oracle. Our articles will be back down to the trash they were with out them. I'm going to find a loop hole in the polcy. Lego3400: The Sage of Time (talk) 21:03, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Dj raiden and Diego Grez
Please stop it, Some users says I'm a vandal and I am Diego Grez, and I uploaded videos related to Diego Grez to YouTube. That's not really. verify. Jespinos only making this for blocking me. Please stop, i'm not Diego Grez. -- MisterWiki   do ya want to speak me?, come there!  - 21:05, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Are not their interest, im not promoting everyone. Im only contributing wikipedia and i am not Diego Grez because he is a vandal, i not.  MisterWiki   do ya want to speak me?, come there!  - 21:29, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Please excuse me, i don't speak so expert the english. -- MisterWiki   do ya want to speak me?, come there!  - 21:48, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

COPYVIO- Sailors
I've noted that only several editors were responsible. To blame the entire Project would be overstepping. If you could help, I'm going through some of the Sailor articles and removing violations. Youtube vidoes and unofficial Music-download sites are used as citations, how these were overlooked is beyond me especially for GA articles. Fox816 (talk) 22:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Go over the Project's list of references if you get a chance. The sites by Michelle Bacon provide unofficial downloading for the anime music. References should be removed pertaining to them as well. Fox816 (talk) 22:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Hawaiian Wikipedia
You removed a speedy tag from this article, with an edit summary: "rm invalid speedy, this is not a biography of a living person". The wording of the tag (my emphasis) is: "This page may meet Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion. The reason given is: It is an article about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content that does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject. (CSD A7)". You are not an admin. Your knowledge of CSD A7 as evidenced in your edit is not good. You should not have deleted the tag, but left it for an admin to do. --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Hawaiian Wikipedia
Why Tagishsimon nominated for deletion the article Hawaiian Wikipedia?, can you help me. -- MisterWiki   do ya want to speak me?, come there!  - 01:19, 28 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I'll answer MW on his talk page. --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:20, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your FightersGeneration point
The issue with Frankie (the site's webmaster) seems mainly to lie on the fact he steals rips from other people without their consent, and the biography info on his site is pulled out of his butt half the time. Despite that though listing the actual sources of artwork vs his site might prove to cause a few complications. Awhile back I was trying to put up some artwork for Rock Volnutt in the page's character box. User:A Man In Black stepped in and gave grief, and then when the artwork was cited as being from a capcom artbook, proceeded to claim that fair use was invalid, and you can guess the rest. So as lousy as the site is, sticking with it as the source might prove the least mess.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 00:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

User:DardGarnd
User:Danny Daniel is banned, but SSP is where one would go to determine whether or not User:DardGarnd is the same person. It doesn't seem all that obvious to me. Regardless, he wasn't editing when he was added to AIV, so that isn't where the report belongs. Evil saltine (talk) 22:51, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I wasn't aware that there were any other socks. - Evil saltine (talk) 22:56, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * After looking at User:DardGarnd's deleted contributions I have blocked him. I apologize for not realizing the problem before. Thank you. - Evil saltine (talk) 23:06, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for making me smile...
I liked the beginning of your comment at this AfD very much. Cheers for making a relatively boring evening slightly different! &mdash;αlεx•mullεr 00:45, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Yu-Gi-Oh! GX media and release information
Thanks for the notice. I see that he didn't give any reasons for reverting the move. As such, I've moved the page back and gave an explanation of the move on the talk page. I've also null edited the redirects to prevent an edit war and to encourage a discussion. --Farix (Talk) 02:42, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Rush
That edit may have been pure stupidity but it sure was hilarious!  Blizzard Beast  ''$ODIN' 03:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Intensity
Do you think this might have been a little harsh? It wasn't exactly a helpful edit, but it was their first edit ever, and it definitely wasn't a deliberate attempt to screw up the wiki. Maybe start with something milder? --Masamage ♫ 22:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * It happens; dumb stuff in large quantities from random strangers accounts for the vast majority of edits to Sailor Moon articles, and that gets old faaaast. But all I figured needed doing was throwing some cookies at the same talk page, which I've done, so it looks good enough to me now. :) --Masamage ♫ 22:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Admin locating
I've got a bit of a...dilemma...with an an article I'm working on regarding what sources I can cite for notability: I've got people arguing against sites like Kotaku, Joystiq, Boing Boing Gadgets, and InsertCredit being valid references despite the sites having established rapport with commercial companies and even interviews with head guys (especially joystiq. Hell they interviewed Mario's creator x.x') Anyway the argument is they don't count because "they're blogs."

So I stop bugging you with this long winded post, given you have more familiarity with who's who here, could you point me at any reasonable wp admin I can make my case regarding these references with that you know of? It's really my last resort.

P.S. Get well soon.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 04:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Actually it's not a fighting game in this case, it's this one I've been writing (and reached the point where nothing else but reception can be said): Final Fantasy VII (Famicom).--Kung Fu Man (talk) 04:22, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

FASHION AFD
You were involved in an AFD for Scene (Fashion Trends) and seem familiar with both it and a related AFD. I'm currently commenting on an AFD here and think it might be related to those previous articles. Since I have never seen either of the previous articles can you shed some light on if this is part of some kind of article recreation?--Torchwood Who? (talk) 13:19, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/A hand in the bush
Per your stated intent here, I have closed this debate as Withdrawn. Just an FYI, UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 12:52, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

FF7 Fam Article Redux
Something is honestly stinking to high heaven here and I don't know the proper way to approach dealing with it. 85.17.237.211 *seems* to be ringleading sock puppet IPs over there, because the responses after his keep coming from single purpose IPs, or those that'd been involved in vandalism before. And one account, User:Foxit22, ended up fire-and-forget. Though the irony in the name is pretty present too: "fox it".

Additionally the guy that even started the AFD seems to have been an account in a similar boat: he targetted it, the category, the screenshots, and Kart Fighter all for AFD nomination in one fell swoop. Additionally the history of the FF7 Famicom page will show that, at the time, he vandalized the article before posting the AFD, making a mess of the reference tags.

I don't know fully what's going on here, but I do know someone is really damn determined to nix that article and they're not playing by the rulebook. Any advice on who to talk to?--Kung Fu Man (talk) 04:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

User talk:141.156.248.139
Don't feed the trolls. :)  Corvus cornix  talk  22:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I know what you mean. Corvus cornix talk  22:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

fansites do not constitute a reliable source
fansites do not constitute a reliable source I agree, that's so true, but what about the manga you download from the fansites? is that a reliable source? and yeah sorry about the 3 reverts >_< i have been all drugged up today to flu tablets, i dont think i will edit till i stop using them-- The Last Uchiha  10:01, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Civility
Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors and remember to be civil, even when others aren't. Stifle (talk) (trivial vote) 12:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism warnings
Hi there. Please avoid insulting the vandals and instead use more innocuous warnings. Consider user talk templates. Cheers. :) -- slakr \ talk / 12:25, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Just a head's up
Since nobody objected, went ahead and combined the Templates "SNK character" and "Capcom fighting character" into "SNK-Capcom character", given the large amount of shared infobetween the two anyway. Probably more useful for any future info/changes you do to the pages, though the old ones redirect to it just fine (all of them o.O Man there was a lot...)--Kung Fu Man (talk) 01:04, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

IP jumper
Good thought; I went ahead and semiprotected all those articles for one week. Hopefully that'll be long enough to instill hopelessness and boredom. :P --Masamage ♫ 04:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Cage/Street fighting
Try not to be such a dick next time, Nathan Gill is a cage fighter, and I've heard that there is a correlation between Nathan Gill and Gill, since both are fighters and have the same name. Don't always assume that you know everything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.143.59.192 (talk) 00:13, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Keep on eye on...
I know you are keeping up with serial sockpuppeteer and hoax article writer Asad Aleem. I think I have just discovered a new user to be one of his puppets...User:Mark Linton. Their edit patterns are very similar: creating tag team articles, PPV articles, and a load of articles in userspace. Also, he recently re-emerged after I indefinitely blocked User:Jeff Money. I can't prove it for now, but since you have an evidence page, I thought you might like to add the name and keep an eye on his edits. If he slips up and reveals himself, I can block him. Thanks. Nikki 311  20:21, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Banditkeith.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Banditkeith.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 19:21, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Banditkeith.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Banditkeith.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:21, 20 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 19:21, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Fake helpme
Well report him to the administrators ad get blocked for trying to get people in trouble. I couldn't see any bad comment anyway. But I will report both of u if I discover u both are messing me up!!! and I wo't be wasting anyones time.  Chubbennaitor   (leave me a message!)  08:18, 21 March 2008 (UTC) irresponsible behaviour needs some punishment and it doesn't matter what u what but if he is messing up people then he needs to be punished. That is the way. He messed up my time. Which s annoying.  Chubbennaitor   (leave me a message!)  08:22, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Please dont
I don't think it helps. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 08:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

edit war
sorry about the thing in Orochimaro, but anyway n_n nice to meet you-- The Last Uchiha  11:27, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * lol, thanks for the advice.-- The Last Uchiha  14:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Cookie


The Last Uchiha has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Alejandro san martin‎
Hey JuJube, can you take a look at this article and try to help me make sense out of what's happening? I left a nice note on the user's talk page but I'm a little confused about what the editor is doing and saw you just tagged a test page he/she made.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 08:57, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * No big deal, I just don't like biting the newbies, but sometimes I think people should do a little reading on the technical process before they jump in to article creation. I also feel bad that you see a lot of users making vanity or tribute articles that could just as easily exist in their own namespace as a part of a userpage if they really feel the need. Maybe there should be an easy to find "Idiots Guide to Article Creation" somewhere.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 09:04, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedying hoaxes
The G3 vandalism speedy criteria now includes blatant hoaxes. Quite a welcome change. DarkAudit (talk) 14:36, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

The Smashing Pumpkins
See LIVE (Band) for an example, and hence my disagreement. So I decided to look for a few more examples, and found "Nine Inch Nails is", and the best, "Infected Mushroom is", soon followed by "...huge role that pioneers Infected Mushroom...". If all of these are simply incorrect, then I guess it's a good thing we've bumped into one another, for further corrections elsewhere to be made. If not, then something is amiss... -Drakan80 (Talk) : 10:52 p.m., March 25, 2008
 * The argument is tired, old and played out. JuJube (talk) 02:20, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Stifle (talk) 11:43, 26 March 2008 (UTC) Never mind, it was nonsense vandalism. Stifle (talk) 11:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Reverting vandalism doesn't violate the 3RR rule. This is obvious vandalism. JuJube (talk) 14:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Which would be why I made this edit... Stifle (talk) 17:10, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Sloppiness on Dhalsim?
Is it just me or is this section messy? Please reply on your talk page. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 04:03, 28 March 2008 (UTC) The user posted this on my talk page but I have removed it. If it is an unofficial live-action movie there would be an article on it, like there is for the unofficial Dragon Ball live-action. The user is probably advertising some illegal foreign movie. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Someone has added information on "Future Cops" without formatting it properly. Since it's not an official movie, and China is notorious for this kind of bootleg stuff, it should probably be removed. JuJube (talk) 04:27, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

I put proper links to IMDB on all the pages, which is a reference. It is not a "Bootleg". You may not know the film Future Cops, but it actually is a big movie in China, directed by Jing Wong who directed many Jacky Chan movies, and stars and All-Star cast of some of the most famous Chinese actors including Andy Lau, Simon Yam, Aaron Kwok, and Jacky Cheung. Perhaps you should research a film before you decide it is unofficial, or not a real film. I am requesting that all the edits for Future cops be put back, and if they need touch ups, feel free to do so or let me know what would make the info better. TheWrench (talk) 05:12, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Then do like JuJube told you on your talk page, create the article. Then we'll see if it passes WP:NN criteria. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 05:37, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Future Cops
I am changing info of Future Cops on Street Fighter Characters back. There are similar mentions of characters appearing outside of Capcom official films and products, and if you are going to remove valid information about one, you will need to remove them all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheWrench (talk • contribs) 14:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Future Cops Likeness
The likenesses of the characters appear in the film, and there are mentions of likeness or name appearances in many of the street fighter character bios. It is valid info, though the names are changed, they ARE the characters. You can check the Chun Li, Ryu, E Honda, Zangief, Fei Long, Hugo, and possibly others. If your opinion is that Future Cops, though obviously street fighter, can not be mentioned due to being non Capcom, then you can not mention who the characters are "possibly" based on, other films or games non-canon that their likeness or name may have appeared in, or any other non-directly street fighter mention on any character's wiki bio. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheWrench (talk • contribs) 15:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

if not the place
If not the place, please transcribe it to the right place. Do not try to hide it and be the judge and executioner yourself. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harry59b (talk • contribs) 12:22, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Future Cops
Have you seen this badly written article? Now I'm thinking it's just kind of joke, see the cast. How is Goku in this movie? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it probably is a hoax. What do you have in mind? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:58, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Perhaps the use of expert-subject would be necessary on the page? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:06, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The movie really does exist and it really does rip-off/reference Street Fighter. It's certainly not worthy of inclusion in the SF character articles, but I think the article on Future Cops should stay. It does need to be rewritten and sourced though. BTW, watch the trailer, it's pretty hilarious.--Atlan (talk) 06:33, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

gayelle
hey at least Gayelle (lesbian) had sources and links.NewAtThis (talk) 04:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Max
I'm not him, honestly. (I was wondering what he meant too ... LOL ... ) Antandrus (talk) 04:45, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Wrote And Recorded This In Less Than Five Hours
Just letting you know that some info has been added to the article, so you might want to reconsider your opinion in the AfD discussion. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 02:27, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that
Yeah, I was wondering what was going on, since you reverted the article to its state before January 5, 2007. How does that happen? Anyway... the templates weren't meant to be insulting to your work as a whole and were meant to object to that particular edit only. I simply didn't (and don't) understand how such a huge change to an article can be done accidentally. Perhaps you're using an editing program that I'm not aware of in which that mistake is easily made?

Also, thanks for pointing me to WP:DTTR; I was not aware of it. Esn (talk) 17:59, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, I missed your Feb 24 message on the talk page about that hoax addition... sorry, it's largely my fault for not weeding that one out. Many of the "upcoming films" on the list are easily verified by putting their name into a google search, but I'm nevertheless trying to slowly add sources for all upcoming films which don't have their own article. Esn (talk) 18:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Hope You Don't Mind
Hope you don't mind that I sprotected your talk page for a short while. Cheers,¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 05:02, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Regret if you were offended
Hey, I'm really sorry if you were offended by my statement regarding Deletion of my article[], although I still firmly stand for what I said. I didn't mean any personal insult and didn't have any idea that people would go on commenting on it. No hard feelings, eh?--Sainik1 (talk) 20:59, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
That rewording helped a lot --Numyht (talk) 13:15, 18 April 2008 (UTC) <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Numyht (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

In my understanding, the divertion of FLIGHT INSPECTION to FLIGHT TEST is a mistake.

If you read carefully, all FLIGHT TEST explanations are talking about special flights where aircratf parameters or design are tested, so plains are the objects under test, whereas FLIGHT INSPECTION is a different world (believe me), and part of it are flights where the object under test are the radio navigation aids.

This is the reason why I respectfully ask you for reconsidering this change, leaving FLIGHT INSPECTION page in a separate and independent entry, the way it was designed.

As you can easily verify, I'm just a rooky in WP, it's my first contribution, and I don't know how to do this yet.

Thank you in advance.

Artcort.fis

You reverted vandalism on my user page!
And for that I thank you! -Captin Shmit (talk) 07:25, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Article: Jesse Andersen
well, i know what actually happened. you reverted back to a english version. after your version went through, mine also went through afterwards... which means that at the the time i wanted to restore a english version i didn't see your revert.

so, my apologizes :-) SomeUsr | Talk Contribs 09:10, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Pluto/Neptune
I figured he did that because Category:Pluto in fiction exists, but Category:Neptune in fiction doesn't. (Which is rather too bad.) --Masamage ♫ 04:09, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

db-foreign
Thank you for helping with patrolling Wikipedia. Please do not place this tag on pages before checking that they actually exist on other Wikipedias. If a page is in a foreign language and does NOT exist in another wikipedia, please use the tag Notenglish and follow the instructions on the tag, i.e., add ~ to the bottom of [ this section of Pages needing translation into English].

Narutards
You created this redirect about 2 years ago. Could you explain it? It seems like it's disparaging. --UsaSatsui (talk) 01:30, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * The redirect could be recreated - AsianWeek uses "Narutard" in here WhisperToMe (talk) 10:54, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Karma 6
Did you try to delete Karma 6 because it is a Rock Band? Why don't you delete Bon Jovi page first?. --Vande75 (talk) 06:02, 27 April 2008 (ET)

Rufus comment on SFIV
Why did you revert my edit on SFIV? --uKER (talk) 17:16, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Chapters in the English version of DN
I *think* in the English version they are called Chapters... while they are pages in the Japanese version. I'll be able to check some days later, but for now it may be best to stick with chapters. WhisperToMe (talk) 09:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

User:Kinghobbit
Hi JuJube. I'm sorry, I've declined a block at the moment. However I have issed a final warning to this editor. The attacks are unacceptable, but let us see if we can retain a potentialy good editor who has just had a rough start. If there is a single further incident I will block. I hope you find this okay. Pedro : Chat  09:38, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:BaberGravidon.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BaberGravidon.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --13:52, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Dhalsim
We never quite finished this discussion. Should this data be re-inserted in the character's page or should we just remove this reference from the others? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 20:48, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Suggest we go through TheWrench's edits and sort things out? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
 * JuJube, are we using common names for all of the Street Fighter characters? If so, I can understand Ken Masters targeting Ken (Street Fighter) but why is M. Bison used over Bison (Street Fighter)? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah. But what about the animated media? Don't they just call him Bison? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:48, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

.................
Whatever! Get off my jock. - 9:23 T/5/15/2008 - PR —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pekin Republican (talk • contribs) 01:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Big TV
You said SPAM, removed? Removed what? I never posted anything? Big TV is not SPAM, when TATA Sky and Dish TV have a an article, why can't Big TV have one? --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC) So I'll remove the rediret, and put a link to Big TV! in it. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:11, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Why I'm being considered a sockpuppet?
Hey! man, who the hell is this Asadaleem12@hotmail.com. I don't know this user and I don't want to but by the way, why have you made me a sockpuppet of this user. I never made false articles which should make me a sockpuppet or I never described this user on Wikipedia (because I don't know him), that you are making me a sockpuppet. If you've any excuse about considering me a sockpuppet, so tell me on my talkpage.--Mark Linton (talk) 13:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Sluggy Freelance
I've made a new section on the talk page about the parodies mention. My ideal goal is to figure out what is an acceptable method of mentioning some of them. --Human.v2.0 (talk) 01:29, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you Sir, much appreciated. .  Esradekan Gibb   "Talk" 23:44, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Bragosherry.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Bragosherry.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 13:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

michael
please I have read your comments and I disagree with you. i cannot understand why someone calls me a trouble maker, there have been some very kind poeple here on wikipedia and sope people who just seem to not have time for me or reject me. thankfully they have chose not to block me, which would be unfair! please do not call me a troublemake this is an unfair alegation SDLexington (talk) 10:28, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

M. Bison and other Street Fighter-related articles
This is a reply to the previous message you sent me before. I've sent it to you here, since you're most likely to ignore my reply there.

First of all. Are you sure yourself Tiamat's FAQ is accurate all the times? You cite it like a Pope who thinks the Bible is the infallible word of God. Do you have all the guides he cites and know Japanese yourself? I've read Tiamat's FAQ myself and it seems to be very poorly sourced in my opinion as much as much I hate to say it. The statement you've sent to me from his FAQ ("Capcom has officially stated that Street Fighter Zero 2 and Zero 3 is the current bridge between SF1 and 2") doesn't state his specific source. When did Capcom ever published such a statement? Was it in All About Capcom Fighting Games? Or in one of the many Street Fighter Zero mooks? From what I gather from most Japanese Street Fighter fansites (like Red Cyclone), they seem to state that Zero 1 and Zero 2 are simply different versions of the same events, just like how 2nd Impact is an expansion of the original SF3 and Super SF2 is an expansion of the original SF2.

Secondly, Tiamat seems to take a lot of things from the games at face value. For example, he states in the Cody section that Cody never fought Rolento and skipped to the Bayside Area in Final Fight. He seems to have gotten this idea from a line in Alpha Cody's dialogue with Rolento in Final Fight One (the GBA port). That may seem to be the case when the line is taken at face value, but if you look it at another way, it's simply the writers poking fun at the old SNES port, which didn't have that level.

And finally, Wikipedia isn't a fansite to post biographies of fictional characters, regardless of whether they're canon or not. The site is supposed to look at the development of fictional characters from the non-fictional perspective and that includes mentioning any retcons and overrides made by the writers no matter what. You don't see the Superman article concentrating only on the Modern Age version of the character. I suggest to read WP:WAF to know how articles about fictional elements should handled.

My suggestion is to ditch the whole "Fictional character biography" and simply focus on the character 's development from Street Fighter II to Alpha and 'IV and cover his other appearances separately. Jonny2x4 (talk) 03:47, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

All good things
Nice to see Jonny2x4's demeanor is still somewhat for the birds from the above text. Sadly what he's saying up there seems to represent in part what the current trend is leaning towards. You saw the Alex redirect, cleaned up the directory template and redirected the slam masters solo articles to the parent game. I think at this point the only thing that'll keep the rest up is watching them, trying to improve them and it would seem even replace Tiamat's guide as needed. We can still cite the books overall anyway.

I'm really just disliking where this is all heading. People are putting too much emphasis on third-party notability and using sites like IGN as some sort of litmus test if an article should exist. Might as well tell people "It must be mentioned this much by bigwigs to pass" when they make an article: it'd save headaches later @_@.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 03:52, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

PS, I probably said it before anyway, but get well soon.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 03:53, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Re:L (Death Note)

 * Stop adding "fictional capoiera practitioners", that's utterly unsubstantiated. JuJube (talk) 21:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The same goes for most of the section. The 'References' simply re-direct to Wikipedia's page on Viz Media (being the distributer of DN 13). Most of it comes from How to Read, and no source other. If that's to be allowed, then why not this fact?


 * If you'll look over DN 13, you'll see that it clearly states that he's a master of the Brazilian martial art of Capoiera. It was even alluded to that he learned the concept from Naomi Misora in Another Note when she told him of the style's benifit.


 * To the point, he is a practitioner of capoiera and a master at that. WickedKnightAlbel (talk) 09:05, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Clay was climbing on the pole
so if you won't let me have this wikipedia page, could you just send me a picture or screenshot or something of it? I need it! thanks. JrpibbJrpibb (talk) 04:05, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

User talk:66.110.252.48
Try not use edit summaries like the one you used there. This is more humorous vandalism than anything else and while the warning is appropriate insulting vandals is more likely than anything else to make them continue vandalizing. JoshuaZ (talk) 03:13, 7 June 2008 (UTC) With all due respect, Mr. Zelinsky, this has gone on for MONTHS. We were innundated with "in America!" for months before "Steve" and "Canada" came about. It's getting a bit tiring by now, the humor beaten out ever since Marik's second council convened. hbdragon88 (talk) 23:59, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I have tried very hard to get the TAS fans to realize that the Wikipedia thing was a joke and that they shouldn't pursue doing it seriously. For my trouble, I was told that it's good that people are still trying to "ruin" Wikipedia and that I should remove the stump from my ass.  I hope you can forgive me for being supremely annoyed with them. JuJube (talk) 03:16, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

User:N78
You seem to be familiar with the Asadaleem12 case, the user seems to have returned as N78. This came up in a mfd. I also have doubts on, the link is an image that used. Cena rium (talk)  14:44, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

could you please do me a favor?
Hello,

I am a master student at the Institute of Technology Management, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan. Currently I am wrapping up my master thesis titled “Can Wikipedia be used for knowledge service?” In order to validate the knowledge evolution maps of identified users in Wikipedia, I need your help. I have generated a knowledge evolution map to denote your knowledge activities in Wikipedia according to your inputs including the creation and modification of contents in Wikipedia, and I need you to validate whether the generated knowledge evolution map matches the knowledge that you perceive you own it. Could you please do me a favor?


 * 1) 	I will send you a URL link to a webpage on which your knowledge evolution map displays. Please assign the topic (concept) in the map to a certain cluster on the map according to the relationship between the topic and clusters in your cognition, or you can assign it to ‘none of above’ if there is no suitable cluster.
 * 2) 	I will also send a questionnaire to you. The questions are related to my research topic, and I need your viewpoints about these questions.

The deadline of my thesis defense is set by the end of June, 2008. There is no much time left for me to wrap up the thesis. If you can help me, please reply this message. I will send you the URL link of the first part once I receive your response. The completion of my thesis heavily relies much on your generous help.

Sincerely

J n W talk 13:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Keep an eye out
I just killed Yu-gi-oh the Abridged Series, which was started a day ago on 24 June. I killed it 25 hours after it was done, but only because i was tipped off over at Talk:Keith Howard. If it's not too much trouble, could you bookmark a Google search for YGO:TAS and alert me when the crap keeps coming up? Thanks. hbdragon88 (talk) 06:21, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy keeps and Daffy Duck episodes
Hello, speedy keep does not apply. Could you please provide a rationale that addresses the concerns of notability and verifiability? Cheers, Dloh  cierekim  02:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC) Ack! Just looking for the strongest reasons I can get. LOL Cheers,  Dloh  cierekim  02:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Ken Masters
The page was unexpectedly moved to this title. Wasn't there consensus on using Ken (Street Fighter)? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:DISCUSSCRUFT
I wrote a new essay with the shortcut WP:DISCUSSCRUFT. This is an essay that is supposed to explain the word "cruft" in neutral terms and promote intelligent discussion about the cruft problem on wikipedia. I know there are already many essays about cruft on wikipedia. But I hope you might be able to give it a read. Perhaps it can be copy-edited or improved in some way. I hope you find it useful. Thank you! Problemchildlsd (talk) 21:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Happy Independence Day!
As you are a nice Wikipedian, I just wanted to wish you a happy Independence Day! And if you are not an American, then have a happy day and a wonderful weekend anyway! :) Your friend and colleague, -- Happy Independence Day!   Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 00:37, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Knight In Tarnished Armor?

 * That would indeed be me. But forgive me, I do not know enough about Wikipedia to get your email address off it.  Mine is j2ehyp at google's email service, if you are so inclined. :)  KiTA (talk) 12:30, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

RE: Street Fighter
Sorry about that, there's been a great deal of rumbling at the video game wikiproject that started with the Sonic articles and kinda spread into here, thankfully to a much lesser degree. So to stave things off a little merged the characters I couldn't find enough for notability on and just focus on the remaining Final Fight character articles for the most part.

I really dislike how notability's tossed around here I must say. It biases things too much in favor of primary characters because of a reliability on reception, which for lesser characters often tends to not exist even if they have plenty of third party coverage. :\

That and I'm still waiting for someone to bother with Poison's GA review, knowing it'll probably land up some left field overlooked reason why it can't pass. Either way, sorry again.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 04:12, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Work yes, but not like it's currently being done. There's too much of a "burn the witch!" attitude going around, and too many people acting like editors sticking with "cruft", when they were treated for years like it was acceptable, are some cancer that must be carved out with intense profanity and whatnot. It's...pretty stupid.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 04:14, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

re:WP:Articles for deletion/Hambycomb
Yo JuJube!

While I will not debate that the youngin' was being more than a little impetuous and such, I think calling him "pathetic" was a little over the line. Its only my two bits of unsolicited advice, but I would think about redacting that comment, because I could see a few editors thinking that your comment violates civility policy. Have a great day, and I do hope you are feeling better! LonelyBeacon (talk) 05:19, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

RE:WP:Articles for deletion/RAVAGE
Peace JuJube! I am not sure if I am doing this right.. but recently I saw that my page is being deleted or in the process of being deleted. I saw this listed

Delete vain vanity in vain. JuJube (talk) 23:47, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

on the following page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/RAVAGE_%28rapper%29

Originally, i saw a page, someone made with a tiny bit of information about me on it, so to keep it accurate, I upgraded the entire page. But I am not sure what's going on, truthfully. Can you explain? maybe email me here info@ravagenrumble.com ? I made an attempt to wikify the article with relevant links but am not sure what to do.

Thank you for your time. peace Ravagenrumble (talk) 12:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Tony Rotherham
I added some references to Tony Rotherham to show notability. You may want to revisit Articles for deletion/Tony Rotherham. --Eastmain (talk) 01:40, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Millennium Items
An article that you have been involved in editing, Millennium Items, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Millennium Items. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ZeroGiga (talk) 04:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Loverly!
Hey, I loved your comments in the AfD discussion for the alleged 2009 film version of "My Fair Lady." Great fun! Ecoleetage (talk) 12:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Titles
I try an remove them if I see them. I know the connections are often obvious, but they do still need a source, because they could still be challenged. Gran2 11:50, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Edit summary
Why not? --Masamage ♫ 04:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Her website didn't say it, but there could be any number of reasons for that--that site was a resume, so it would make sense for it to list only the things she wanted to be known for. I don't think we have any evidence that she didn't play that role. Your points about IMDB are good, but I don't know. Is there a guideline or anything about it? Because it seems weird for us to just pick and choose; it'd be nice if there was a systematic way to go about judging it. -Masamage ♫ 20:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Liu Kang
I know Liu Kang came before Fei Long and I originally put him with Kim Dragon from World Heroes as one of the first Bruce Lee inspired characters as Mortal Kombat like World Heroes was made in 1992, but you removed that as well. So I put him with the others thinking I had made a mistake because you removed him. It's not my fault you got your facts wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.190.192.19 (talk) 15:12, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Re Street Fighter II article edit
Three interesting reads for you: WP:AGF, WP:CIV and WP:BITE. Have a nice day.
 * No hard feelings, I should've read the whole paragraph before editing, anyway. Hope the rephrasing is okay, though. 90.35.45.130 (talk) 13:52, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Smashing Pumpkins
A song appearing in a trailer is not notable, especially since it's not that difficult to get permission to put one in there. Think of all the times you've heard the Rolling Stones in a movie trailer. WesleyDodds (talk) 22:05, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Both films are by Warner Bros., and rights to the song are owned by Warner Bros. Records. Corporate synergy. WesleyDodds (talk) 22:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)