User talk:JuJube/Archive May 2007

ygo-tas
Omg so thats just it. I don't break any rules but your just going to deleat it. There's nothing bad. I talk about the infringement and i cited all my stuff. Why is it nonsense? I thought this was where people could put information about things that they don't do and others find interesting. If your a fan why don't you just make one? I don't care if its mine it just seems like the series and its background story is an interesting topic in today's world? w/e I tried Reku68 05:16, 21 April 2007 (UTC)reku68

Rand Kannenberg
Hello. We made significant changes. Do they help? Please let us know. Thank you.Cjas 05:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)cjas

so unfair
Of course there is going to be no way to find a reliable unbiased source on a youtube movie. That doesn't even make sense. The only way that would happen is if someone mae an online bibliography about the guy who probably wants to keep to himself. So really nothing that is fanmade or just made privatly can be created on wikipedia? Y does it really matter if yu-gi-oh is posted. No one believed that wikipedia is a crediable source and nothing you ever do will change that. Unless you take away everything it is. But as of now wiki cannot be used for any projects in school or used as reliable fact in any professional setting. If what people say about the series is true that why deleat it. All i said was whay he did, who his userprofile was, and some links that talked about some of the issues being discussed. The article wasn't biased one way or the other and nothing was said against youtube. Do i have to create 5 differrent sites about this guy's life before i can do this site and if so, list things i should ask him. Reku68 05:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)reku68

re:Josh ball
Sorry about that, you're probably right about the speedy. At the moment of the edit conflict, I replaced your tag, thinking at a glance it was an identical prod tag, just without the justifications I had carefully selected ;) Ødipussic 09:14, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for telling me that... Now that I know this, I won't ask again. Thanks again.Lightning Sword 00:20, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thank you for the revert on the Michael Clarkson article and the warning to Vanderklei. I was just about to go over there and leave him a nasty message, but I am glad I did not have to. I am just about out of patience. With all the changes he's made to the article, the copy-vio still stands---the text is copied verbatim, however he formats it. Anyway, thanks, as always, for your time and efforts. ---Charles 22:35, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Ni (attack) AfD
Hey there, I agree with you that it's a stupid article, but since it doesn't fit the criteria for "nonsence" and the original creator put the "hang on" tag there several times, I thought it should be moved to AfD. Even if this does mean it will be there for a little bit longer There is no deadline I suppose... :-) Witty lama 00:55, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

NPA
Sorry, I overwrote your comment on Tonyppe's talk page by mistake, I hope you don't mind. – Riana ऋ 02:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
For reporting the Traceguy vandal yo AIAV, I was just about to. Cheers, Dfrg.msc 03:08, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of World Islamic Mission
Dear juju, though u deleted my Page i am again creating with Sources. i committed mistake to delete that Thing. Hope u will coperate. Shabiha 10:07, 24 April 2007 (UTC)shabiha

Thanks!
Hi - just stopped by to say thanks for protecting my user page from the recent vandalism, much appreciated! --Parzival418 23:59, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

JUJUBE, why do you think my proposed entry on "Aja'ib al-makhluqat" is good for deletion? Please reply to me. I see you are a Baha'i, so am I. - NECADEMIC

fixing vandalism on Hrithik Roshan
Hi- You tried to undo the vandalism on Hrithik Roshan, but I think it's more extensive than you realized:

For instance: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hrithik_Roshan&diff=126111297&oldid=124665987

has some vandalism around line 24. I'm not familiar enough with this topic to fix.

Sockettome 10:52, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

User:068152
I'm sorry, I taught him to RC patrol and forgot to explain what vandalism really is. He will jump the gun. --Pupster21 Talk To Me 20:49, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

The admin notice board section
I am sorry to say this, but I took the comment you made about me and him being "suspicious" as an insult. I am a kid who just wants to make Wikipedia a better place. --Pupster21 Talk To Me 23:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Pushpa and Shobha
I didn't do Shobha. ;) I suppose Pushpa should be speedied as empty (sigh). NawlinWiki 18:16, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Bryan Haile---deletion review, yes or no?
I received a message from Bhaile08 asking for my comment on a deletion review for his article. However, I can find no such deletion review. Are you aware of his having requested one? I see no chance of it resulting in anything since the article was an autobio, and he is completely nonnotable. I do not care one way or the other, but if there is a deletion review, I'd like to add my two cents worth. ---Charles 04:01, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Well, he's welcome to blow all the smoke he likes. I have washed my hands of him. Thanks for your reply. ---Charles 04:08, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

It is not incorrect information!!!!!
Your message: Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. JuJube 01:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Far Cry is Rush's new single!

The information is CORRECT, so therefore its considered vandalism for you taking it away. Leave my shit alone.

Fotolia
Hi. I was researching this company's notability when it was speedily deleted. I notice that you re-tagged it.. I think there's more than enough out there to rule out speedy deletion -- take a look at the notes I left at Talk:Fotolia. Also, I note that the article's creator, E20Ci is an established editor. --A. B. (talk) 13:17, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

You know...
Anything is possible... – Riana ऋ 13:26, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Mizuo Peck
It's a little surprising that you warned User talk:Purplepedigreepup to stop creating the article for Mizuo Peck considering she is a well-known actress with over 37,000 Google hits for her name in quotes. This is a good example of deletionist tendencies gone awry. Sometimes I think you guys just don't do your research, and you hurt Wikipedia in the process. --David Shankbone 14:30, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Articles for Deletion
Hello! If I find one that I agree should be deleted, I promise that I will vote as such, but if I have a reason to keep, why not share it? Should I comment that you mostly vote to delete articles based on your recent history as evidence of something? If you notice, most of my edits are grammatical in nature, correcting typos and such. I do NOT just go to article for deletion discussions and run down the lists or something. I also should note that I'm currently using a university IP and so not all of the edits in the IPs history will be mine. If you would like, I'll voluntarily hold off from articles for deletion, but if you disagree with my side of things, then shouldn't we just discuss where we disagree? Take care, one of the many users of --164.107.223.217 00:31, 30 April 2007 (UTC) P.S. That's quite unfair to "report me" without discussing your concerns further. Please show some courtesy in that regard. Thanks! --164.107.223.217 00:33, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Please don't slant wikipedia. bahaism not 2nd most idespread religion in the world
with all respect to your beliefs, bahaism is not 2nd most idespread religion in the world it may be the "true" religion but its members are too few for its views to dominate other parts of wikipedia if we put bahai's view we'll have to include hundreds of other sects, religions, with same or higher member ship numbers please dont push your POV onto wikipedia, it just ruins the good work of other people on wikipdia.Esmehwp 01:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you 4 not pushing POV.

also the key word in your reference of 15 years ago is "independent" this is a subjective judgment, and if it were taken out we look fairly at it, bahaism compared to all other religious movements "dependant" or "independant" bahaism would be very very very far down the list there are popua new guinean sects with more followers than bahaism. Also please note i'm not an advocate of anyother religion and am not pushing for anything I just want fairness.

Esmehwp 01:52, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank You As Well
Thanks for the help with user 72.223.117.236. D-Hell-pers 07:07, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Removing others' AFD arguments
Please do not remove others' arguments from AfD discussions, as you did at Articles for deletion/Oi-ist. As blatantly unconstructive as a comment may seem, it is still highly frowned upon to edit others' comments in talk pages and discussions. You are free to reply to the comment with your own criticism instead. Thanks! Krimpet (talk) 07:33, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

That troll we've recently met
If you catch him again, just leave me a note on my Talk page and I'll look into it. I'm about to hit the hay, so while I've got a lot of his activities on my watchlist, things may change overnight. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 09:59, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Bahá'í Faith
I'm not sure if this concerns you, but given your recent interactions with an editor, I thought you may wish to know this editor has nominated the article for Featured article review. LuciferMorgan 10:33, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Apologies
My deepest apologies then. Damn, even a 99% efficiency at reverting vandalism gets you if you revert a 100 edits a day. Ah well... I only have the best intentions. Cheers. -- xompanthy 11:56, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Delete?
I saw that you put a vandalism tag on the Hart wrestling family page and put it up for Speedy Delete. Since nothing on the page actually has been vandalised or in any way slanderous or negative I cannot understand why you would put that tag on the page? Everything on the page in the current version is common knowledge if you are a wrestling fan and it's watched by several WP:PW contributors to keep vandalism away from it. MPJ-DK 12:45, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

WP:AIV Request
Thank you for making a report on Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) (Talk) 02:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC) Google doesn't mean anything i swear Kindchild22 01:13, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Alas...
I haven't actually been able to keep up with Homestar runner cartoons for months, too much other stuff to do, i'm afraid I don't know what that phrase is from, unless that's from the very first Homestarmy related episode, but its been so long, I might not be remembering it clearly. Homestarmy 03:18, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

NorthAmvandal
Can anything be done about this guy? I've seen a similar contribs list over and over on the Rush page, always the same thing. Does anyone know who this guy is, why he's doing this, and is there any way to block him? As you well know, reverting his actions is irritating, since he almost always goes TO 3, not past. ThuranX 05:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Thought You Would Get A "Kick" Out of This
So i followed WoodWinder into Admin Metros' discussion page, and tried to explain to WoodWinder why he/she is wrong and needs to pay attention. As seen on his/her discussion page, WoodWinder does not understand the difference between marked and actual deletion, so I wrote this metaphoric situation.

Please RE-READ your discussion page WoodWinder. JuJube mentions "I only marked it for deletion" several times (you can check the time-stamps). This means "marked", not "deleted". It's like your classmates at school who place a "Kick Me" sign on your back ... they are not the ones that kick you, it's the subsequent students you pass in the hall. The first student "only marks" you to be kicked. D-Hell-pers 06:13, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Shun Goku Satsu
According to the move, Street Fighter Alpha: The Movie, which of course is an official Capcom endorsed film, Ryu does in fact become evil and loses controll, hence making him 'canon'. Since no one even mentioned Evil Ryu's ability to do this. Various people have added that moves on other games reference that they have the ability to do that move, therefore Ryu can do the Shun Goku Satsu. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NINgod (talk • contribs) 18:01, 1 May 2007 (UTC).

This is taken directly from Ryu's page Evil Ryu:

"He was originally introduced in a Street Fighter Zero manga series authored by Masahiko Nakahira and later adapted in the Street Fighter canon by Capcom. He is the version of Ryu should he succumb to Satsui no Hadou, and depicts Ryu's struggle to resist the urge. Gameplay-wise, Evil Ryu has more powerful attacks than the original, strikes faster and possesses some of the attacks of Akuma (such as the Shun Goku Satsu). The only time Evil Ryu actually appears in Street Fighter canon is at the end of the first World Warrior tournament. According to the Street Fighter Alpha series, Sagat, the defending champion, crushed Ryu, and then extended his hand to help Ryu up after thinking that he had won. Ryu was so consumed with the desire to win that he gave into the Satsui no Hadou ("Evil Intent" in the American version) and executed a Metsu Shoryuken, scarring Sagat's chest and his pride."

Plunderathon page
I think I have fixed the notability issue you brought up on the Plunderathon page. There is a lot more to fix, and I will work on it some more once I manage to track down some article dates to cite, and see if I can find an online copy of the police report from last year's event. If you get the chance to look at it again, I would appreciate some more advice on it.--Davethehorrible 20:08, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Apology
I just wanted to apologize personally if I've come off to harshly over on the admin noticeboard. My reaction was, I'll admit, fairly emotional, and I already regret reacting that way.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 22:47, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

re: Markuspassion
I'm not trying to make a duplicate; I'm creating a new page for the Bach passion setting so the original St. Mark Passion page can be a disambiguation page. PatrickWaters 00:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

AIV
It basically means there was no evidence in his contrib log, and no notice on his talk page, so no way for an admin to verify the block. Whoever deleted his contrib would have to make a note in order to have an effect. -- Auto ( talk / contribs ) 02:10, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

The Key of Time
This is a bit of a congratulatory note on your AfD for this article. You can find my reasons for this random note here. ~ G1ggy!  blah, blah, blah 05:54, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

re: SOOper seCRet PaGE
Dumb. Not helpful. Would be vaguely insulting if I could muster up the required emotion. Probably wouldn't survive MfD. – Rianaऋ 06:42, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Sakura Haruno
I'll watch over that for the next few hours, dear Jube - Allie needs to get some sleep ;) Buenas noches!  P h a e d r i e l  - 09:17, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

List of Internet phenomena
No. I see two comments about it, one that states he's notable and should be included, the other saying he isn't and "it has been discussed elsewhere." There was never a discussion, there was never a clear consensus. This isn't the Peppers article, it's an article about Internet Phenomena. The Parsnip! 14:12, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Featured list candidates/List of Kashimashi episodes
Now that the images have been removed (they are gone from all episode lists now), would you mind reassessing your previous comment about it failing a criterian that doesn't apply anymore?-- 十  八  01:23, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Hadouken
Sorry for writing too much rubbish but I think a small amount of what I wrote should maybe be kept, to explain the just "very" basics of it that are missing, like it being a fireball projectile emitted from the hands that moves horizontally across the screen, associated with Ryu & Ken. Also appeared in movies too. I think when aerial Hadouken came into the games after there only being ground based ones to start with is notable difference to game play too. And yes, leave out the rest of the rubbish I wrote. Sorry

I am a bit weary of touching the article now though in case I get blocked or something for supposed vandalism or edit-war, but remember Assume good faith and stuff sorry again for writing rubbish. Carlwev 19:17, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Tatsumaki Senpuu Kyaku
That's fine, but could you tell me where I could find that transltion? Ashura96 19:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the info :) Ashura96 19:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey
Hey, thanks for coming behind me and doing that. I must have forgotten. (new tagging pallette) --Pupster21 Talk To Me 20:14, 3 May 2007 (UTC) Thanks!

PS

Re:SKJ Crew
I was not trying to encourage, I guess I wanted to show those two that there's just some stuff that isn't on Wikipedia for a reason, and that how "funny" something is, or that it's on Youtube doesn't mean it should be on Wikipedia (this was the original creator's arguement against my original Speedy Deletion, and his friend came on and attempted to "argue" their point), and maybe that us Wikipedians are a bunch of meanies who won't let people have any fun making articles about Youtube videos ^__^SuperDT 02:23, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Oh bull u said u would help me and that it was popular in sweden Kindchild22 22:08, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Haha, I looked at his talk page, and I did a typo. I meant to say I would not delete the article; I can't stop other "meanie" Wikipedians, however. And I made an honest mistake trying to help that article; I thought there was some sort of claim of notability in there, that claim being the popularity in Sweden. However, a Google search quickly proved me wrong. My bad. SuperDT 23:53, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

I can get sources to it being popular in Sweden! Batistadx 20:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Userpage Vandalism
Thanks for letting me know, I'll keep an eye on him. ^ demon [omg plz] 03:20, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

My thanks
My thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. Sephiroth BCR 03:21, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

For this gem...


... you deserve this! Thanks for the good laugh, dear Jube!  P h a e d r i e l  - 04:03, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: "Forrest Gerst" Article
Just wanted to inform you that I was only trying to write an article in accordance with the Requested articles/Other categorization schemes. Sorry about using your time up and writing it.--Indubiousbattle 15:08, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Ami and boys
Thanks for letting me know. Ami definitely displays attraction to guys on occasion, though, so I think it needs to be mentioned. The Starlights are the prime example. Also, in a more general sense, she talks wistfully about romance in ep. 45. --Masamage ♫ 04:56, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
I would also like to thank you for reverting vandalism on my user page. Senshimaru 16:04, 4 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the smiley! Hope your break is shorter than you planned. Xiner (talk) 00:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Oldest organsim
I just want to tell you that that was sarcasm that I was using when referring to someones comments about my nomination, and I'm sure you realize allegations are a rude form of conduct.And his theory is debunct anyways, read the discussion, of course I wouldn't nominate a page out of personall reasons. Rodrigue 22:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

PBS and Wikipedia, reverting Links
Hi JuJube:

I appreciate all the hard work you do for Wikipedia, but in this case you've acted too quickly. Links I contribute from Public Broadcasting (PBS) affiliate KQED are not spam. Occasionally adding a single link to individual content-appropriate page is only being done to add value to the discussion. They are being added with careful consideration and with "extreme caution" as the guidelines request. For more info on PBS:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBS

KQED is a non-profit, public benefit corporation, and the stories I link to are just as appropriate as links to sources like Scientific American magazine or the Washington Post on those same pages.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KQED

You will note that a user has already reverted your change on the "Mavericks" page, stating that the link was reputable and of high quality. I believe the LIDAR link should be restored, and ask you to do so.

If you feel that a story on video game accessibility is not appropriate for the page "Video Games," then please give me your opinion on where a better link would be.

Wikipedia should welcome PBS as a trusted source, and invite it to add links when the stories inform the whole.

Respectfully,

Craigrosa 16:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

About Q
Oh, OK, thanks. I put it in because the likeness did never escape my sight (even though I wrote the character on the boat looked like Q, not ehat he was indeed). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.9.181.92 (talk) 15:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC).

Maki (Final Fight)
I semi-protected the article... WjBscribe 23:02, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Guile
very valid point

sorry for the problem. SniperSarge 02:43, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Changing your password
Danny can't change your password. If you've set an e-mail address, you can change it yourself and if not, please set an e-mail address in your preferences. After you've done this, you can log out, enter your user name and select e-mail my password. You will then be e-mailed your old password and will be able to change your password. Yonatan talk 03:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Hell
You asked the question, "to believe in Hell, don't you have to believe in a God who will put you there if you do bad?"

The simple response is no. This is not a defining concept of hell. Some religions have a measure of whether an individual should go to hell (such as the Ancient Eqyptian hell - although strangely there are no references to anyone being sent there). Perhaps you are solely thinking of hell in Judeo-Christian terms? Candy 09:14, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Note of thanks
Thank you for removing the threats left on my talk page. Wikipedians like you make this site a nicer place. Thanks! -- Will2710 |Talk! 18:42, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Congrats
Meh! Meh meh meh! Thank you, and thanks for voting for me. ^_^ I noticed that you ran for admin recently, but only after it was over, which was sad, because I totally would have voted for you. Hope I get in on that next time. :) --Masamage ♫ 04:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)