User talk:Juansempere

This is the draft about the introduction that I wrote for the article, explaining the changes.

Multiple sclerosis introduction
Multiple sclerosis (abbreviated MS, also known as disseminated sclerosis) is a chronic, inflammatory disease that affects the neurons of the central nervous system (brain and spinal cord). MS causes gradual destruction of the cover of the neurons, the myelin sheath, and transection of their axons, leaving patches or scars (called scleroses) throughout the brain and spinal cord.

It is thought that MS results from attacks by an individual's immune system on the nervous system and is therefore categorized as an autoimmune disease.

Multiple sclerosis may take several different forms, with new symptoms occurring either in discrete attacks or slowly accruing over time. Between attacks, symptoms may resolve completely, but permanent neurologic problems often persist.

Although much is known about how MS causes damage, its exact cause remains unknown. MS currently does not have a cure, though several treatments are available which may slow the appearance of new symptoms.

Removed
clicking on neuron will appear this: Multiple sclerosis affects neurons the cells of the brain and spinal cord that carry information, create thought and perception, and allow the brain to control the body.

It is moved to epidemiology: MS primarily affects adults, with an age of onset typically between 20 and 40 years, and is more common in women than in men

this is already inside of myelin: Surrounding and protecting some of these neurons is a ..., which helps neurons carry electrical signals. ...

This was movd to symptoms: MS can cause a variety of symptoms, including changes in sensation, visual problems, muscle weakness, depression, difficulties with coordination and speech, severe fatigue, and pain. Although many patients lead full and rewarding lives, MS can cause impaired mobility and disability in more severe cases. This scarring causes symptoms which vary widely depending upon which signals are interrupted.

Changes to multiple sclerosis
I made the changes to multiple sclerosis for a couple of reasons. The history section is last because of the manual of style for medical articles. Obviously it has to be somewhere in the article and the current discussion had led to a consensus that historical aspects of diseases should be at the end. The rationale for this is that most people who read an encyclopedic article about a disease are most interested in the symptoms, etc. of the disease and less interested in the historical aspects. The goal of Wikipedia is to create encyclopedic articles with the most popular and pertinent information early in the article. I think that overall it's a good idea. As for the lead, the ideal lead (WP:LEAD) should summarize the article. The shorter lead did not do that as well, in my mind. Obviously everything is up for discussion! The nice thing about the article is that it has been painstakingly proofread by a large number of editors as it went through the peer review and featured article process. It should be a fairly stable article as far as grammar, word choice, layout, and style is concerned. Changes to the prose other than refinement of the medical data and introduction of new concepts are most likely going to be lateral, at best. Anyway, it's all up for discussion and nothing is hard and fast, obviously! InvictaHOG 11:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I rewrote the sentence - the lead needs to address the different outcomes of the disease and it was simply the wording which was offensive (even if probably overly sensitive). The history section complies, again, with the manual of style. As there are no hard and fast rules, discussion of the contents of the manual of style is encouraged and expected. I would hesitate to change the title in just this article, however. As for the epidemiology and Why MS occurs sections, they do overlap a bit. However, dividing the content does allow for smaller, more easily read sections which are key in featured articles. InvictaHOG 19:19, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Caucasian vs white people
It's not that I prefer the term white people to Caucasian or Caucasoid in medical articles, it's that I prefer any term at all to Caucasian in any article, because it is a disambiguation page and an out of date, inaccurate and USA-centric term for whites. The real meaning of Caucasian is someone who is from the Caucasus region or speaks the Languages of the Caucasus. On Wikipedia this group is called the Caucasian peoples. I have never replaced the term Caucasoid in any Wikipedia article, as far as I recall. Spylab 03:10, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

An Automated Message from HagermanBot
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 22:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Otto Marburg notability
I'm concerned that Otto Marburg may not be a notable person. What are your thoughts? - grubber 20:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Request for edit summary
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Flight dynamics
You now need to finish the job by checking "what links here" to fix all the links to roll, pitch and yaw, which need to point where you moved this content. Dhaluza 19:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

I just wanted to say hello
I saw you are one of the most active people in the MS article, and since I saw your name also in the MS article in spanish I have thought you may be from Spain. I´m spanish and I´m following nearly the english MS page since I work investigating cognitive aspects of MS. Where are you from? What do you work at? --Garrondo 14:11, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Hola. Pues si. Soy de Madrid. Ahora estoy haciendo el doctorado en ingenieria industrial. Mi interés por la EM no es profesional sino porque conozco casos cercanos.

Un saludo.

Buenas, ya que eres español paso a escribir en castellano cuando "discuta" contigo cambios, ya que logicamente me cuesta bastante menos. Yo soy psicólogo y trabajo desde hace poco en una investigación sobre deterioro cognitivo en EM. No entiendo porque dices que esos 3 síntomas son la consecuencia del avance de la enfermedad y no de un daño en una localización cerebral concreta: creo que la localización es tan específica como en cualquiera de los otros síntomas y en todo caso su única diferencia es que sus efectos son ´más visibles que otros. Incluso en el mismo artículo habla de donde deben darse las lesiones para que ocurran: En el caso de la neuritis la inflamación debe comprimir el nervio optico, en el caso de la oftalmoplegia en el tronco cerebral y en el caso de la mielitis en la médula..., por lo que no me parece válida tu razón para mantenerlos de manera tan preponderante en el artículo en comparación con el resto de síntomas. Contestame en mi página de discusión o en la del artículo Un saludo--Garrondo 16:18, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Lo cambio yo, de todas formas he pensado que como poco a poco ire añadiendo datos a los símtomas cognitivos y emocionales, y que antes o después llegará un momento que tenga que crear un artículo separado de síntomas lo puedo hacer ahora, y así guardar los datos de esos tres síntomas que sin duda también tienen su importancia..., voy a crear un artículo separado con todo el apartado de síntomas, dejando lo que está en el principal y ya lo iremos remodelando cuando haya más información --Garrondo 09:02, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Bien hecho
La página de pathophsyiology realmente necesitaba un empujón. Una pregunta ¿Era Luccinetti o Luchinetti? Aparece 2 veces el nombre y cada una de las 2 es distinto. Por mi parte estoy creando un template para tratar de poner en contacto las diferentes páginas sobre MS y crear una especie de proyecto sobre MS ya que creo que a día de hoy la página general está francamente bien. Cuando lo tenga hecho te lo enseño. Un saludo--Garrondo 07:21, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

He puesto en la pagina de discusión de multiple sclerosis el template que he creado; a ver que te parece. Un saludo--Garrondo 13:55, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

EAE
No creo que el lugar en el template del EAE sea en borderline forms al ser un modelo animal. Personalmente creo que sería mejor ponerlo en algún tipo de categoría tipo investigación. Te parece?--Garrondo 13:40, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

He leido un par de abstracts sobre lo de Susac y pone que es una angiopatía; es decir por lo que entiendo su origen es vascular, e incluso si existe un componente autoinmune no creo que haya razón suficiente para incluirlo en el template. Yo lo eliminaría. Por otro lado pone en el artículo que hay 200 casos en todo el mundo; y en pubmed solo aparecían 50 artículos sobre el tema... o sea que no creo tampoco que sea suficientemente relevante para incluirlo. Voy a revertir los cambios del template, cambiar el apartado de patofisiología y ponerlo como investigación en esclerosis múltiple poniendo el EAE y la patofisiología dentro. --Garrondo 14:58, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Schilder
No se como se fusionan páginas así que me harías un favor si lo haces tu. De todas formas creo que no hay nada aprovechable en la otra página: prácticamente no dice nada y lo que dice no aparece con citas; y dice que se parece a otras enfermedades también rarísimas sin decir porqué. No se cual de los dos nombres será más correcto. --Garrondo 16:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

De hecho estaba releyendo ese artículo y es malísimo; pero la verdad es que el nombre es mejor que el mío: creo que lo mejor sería fundirlos ambos poniendo el texto que escribí yo en la página que han encontrado. --Garrondo 16:14, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Citaciones
Te mando una herramienta que suelo usar a menudo: si metes la referencia de pubmed te crea el template de cita de wikipedia; y solo hace falta poner el ref al principio y final. Además así tendríamos todas las citas en el mismo formato. Es online en esta dirección

http://diberri.dyndns.org/wikipedia/templates/

--Garrondo 07:19, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Relación con leukodistrofias
He estado mirando la relacion que aparecía en el artículo sobre la enfermedad de Schilder y las otras enfermedades que aparecían. Lo común a todas ellas es que todas son leukodistrofias. En las leucodistrofías no se desarrolla adecuadamente la mielina; por lo que tienen algunas características en común con la EM. Sin embargo esto no aparece en forma de brotes ni placas y la gran mayoría son hereditarias. Sin embargo la posible relación de la enfermedad de Schilder con las leukodistrofias se acaba ahí. En pubmed apenas aparecen 10 artículos si pones leukodistrophy and schilder o Krabbe y leukodistrophy; la mayoría en revistas muy poco importantes y sin aparecer schilder en ninguno de los abstracts. También he buscado la relación en google y creo que el que hizo el artículo lo copio todo de este link: y por eso no aparecía ninguna cita. En los dos artículos de la revista de neurología ([www.neurologia.es]; gratuita) que hablan de la enfermedad tampoco la relacionan en ningún momento con las leukodistrofias. Aunque lo he arreglado un poco explicando que son las leukodistrofias creo que lo más acertado sería eliminar el parrafo del todo.

--Garrondo 14:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Yo también he pensado que probablemente tuviese que ver con eso. A que cambios te refieres en la página de EM? Hazlos y les echamos un ojo. Por cierto; quería comentarte que yo trabajo en un centro con acceso a la mayor parte de las revistas cientíticas del mundo, y que no me cuesta nada entrar. Si en algún momento necesitas acceso a algún artículo (de EM u otros temas) pidemelo y te lo mandaré por mail. Mi objetivo a partir de ahora creo que va a ser centrarme en el artículo de síntomas; voy a intentar hacer un apartado de cada uno de los síntomas; al estilo de los 5 que ya están... pero me va a llevar bastante tiempo porque lo voy a hacer poco a poco... así que cualquier ayuda será bienvenida.

Un saludo --Garrondo 10:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

enfermedades relacionadas
Hoy le he preguntado a mi jefe (neurólogo) sobre la pregunta que me hicieste de si se consideraban una o distintas enfermedades. Me ha dicho que a día de hoy no hay datos suficientes para decidirlo; que en todo caso son enfermedades de un mismo grupo, pero que no se puede saber si son distintas enfermedades o solo variantes. Un saludo. --Garrondo 12:51, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Si realmente es lo más usado cambialo, pero estaría bien cambiarlo también en el texto de la página de EM y en la página de borderline forms incluyendo alguna cita de algún sitio. Si puedes ponme alguno de los números pubmed de los artículos en lo que lo has leido.Yo por mi parte sigo con mi proyecto de la página de síntomas de la EM... y tengo para una buena temporada. En este momento estoy haciendo el apartados sobre dolor y tengo también en mente hacer otro sobre fatiga. Un saludo. --Garrondo 14:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Que tal todo?-Therapies for multiple sclerosis-
Que tal todo? Como ves este agosto he venido con fuerzas de vacaciones y le he dado un buen repaso al artículo de terapias. Espero que te guste. Supongo que te habrás enterado, pero solo era para que supieses que he pedido que se someta tanto a "scientic peer review" como a "peer review". Cualquier comentario que puedas hacer será bienvenido ya que mi intención es que cuando terminen las revisiones poder presentarlo a la categoría de good-article. Un saludo. --Garrondo 10:04, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Therapies for multiple sclerosis
He nominado este artículo a Featured article después de trabajar un montón en él... Necesitaré votos de gente que se lo lea entero... así que la verdad estaría muy agradecido si fueses uno de ellos. Un saludo Garrondo 14:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Entra a la página de discusión del artículo y pincha en leave comments. Sí realmente crees que cumple los criterios de featured article debes poner support y comentar porque, y luego firmar. También puedes oponerte si crees que aun le falta algo para cumplir los criterios. Si quieres entra a Featured article candidates y allí te dice exactamente cómo hacerlo. Un saludo --Garrondo 14:34, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Euler2.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Euler2.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Boston Life Sciences
A tag has been placed on Boston Life Sciences requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mblumber (talk) 13:05, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Online first
I'm really not sure if it is a good idea to refer to papers that have not yet been published in print. When you added PMID 18535026 to multiple sclerosis I had to manually update the citation template. Papers that have not appeared in print do not yet get the scrutiny (e.g. rapid responses) that printed papers get. Do you think we could remove your addition until the paper is printed? JFW | T@lk  10:21, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes. I am not familiar with the scrutiny process. Remove it if you consider that it is not trustworthy.
 * It is trustworthy. It has passed the referees reviews and it will finally be printed exactly as it appears in the web. I do not see why should it be deleted.--Garrondo (talk) 10:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Easy Java Simulations
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Easy Java Simulations, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. EyeSerene talk 17:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of RPMforge
I have nominated RPMforge, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/RPMforge. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Oscarthecat (talk) 10:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Aircraft principal axes
Hi Juansempere! I notice you have made some substantial changes to Aircraft principal axes. I have no objection to your changes, but I notice you have not made any comment about your changes, or your plan for future changes, on the Talk:Aircraft principal axes page. There are multiple Wikipedia users who are interested in this subject and they would be very interested to understand your objectives and your plans.

I have started a new section on the Talk:Aircraft principal axes page, and invited you to let us know about your plans for this article. Best regards, Dolphin51 (talk) 06:26, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Yaw, Pitch, Roll
Hello,

I strongly oppose the change in axes you made in the article to match the picture : the overwhelming convention is x facing forward: just follow the first reference of the article on googlebooks. Moreover, as it is, the article is inconsistent, as the matrices haven't changed.

I suggest you edit the picture replacing the green "Y" by the old green "X", and just draw a wider arc for $$\psi$$ (which goes from the x axis, ie just add a little 90 degree arc in the x-y plane) if you want to minimize the changes to be done to the picture.

Thank you. 70.81.15.136 (talk) 08:55, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The problem doing that is that I get then a left-handed system, again against the text.


 * Woa, that was fast :) I don't think so, unless I'm missing something, it's ok now, psi is just 90 degrees wider that's all. Unless you're talking about the 2 negative angles, which is not a problem.  One thing that might be helpful to add in the image caption though is something like "Note that theta is negative on the picture". Maybe for the roll too in the current picture.  Or make the roll positive and show the belly of the plane. I actually was about to do that, hence me finally registering to wiki, to upload a picture, if you want to use it, you can check it out here: http://ifile.it/wa2kr0z  Aoikibo (talk) 11:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Regarding image:plane.svg The NED frame is OK. The airplane frame is also OK. But the sign of Psi seems incorrect. Roll, Pitch and Yaw are all positive angles. 192.54.144.229 (talk) 14:11, 8 October 2010 (UTC)


 * OK. I will try to fix it as soon as I have time. Thanks.

Kak on Heliocentrism
I've reverted the edit you recently made to heliocentrism. It isn't because the change you made didn't make sense; it's because the sentence involved was presenting Kak's claim and should reflect his view. --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 02:43, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

MS
Ni idea; pero el tema es que hace 1 año tuve un cambio de trabajo. Sigo en el mismo centro de investigación pero ahora me dedico a neuroimagen funcional con pacientes con parkinson y alzheimer; así que estoy bastante desconectado. Un saludo. --Garrondo (talk) 15:46, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Hola. No estoy muy de acuerdo con tu adición al artículo principal. En este momento en Wikipedia priman las revisiones a los artículos primarios, y la referencia que usas es de los segundos. Sabes si existen revisiones que propongan como hipótesis causal "Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency"? Por otro lado incluso si los hubiese me da la sensación (pero se me puede convencer), que van a ser pocas y que en general es una visión muy minoritaria, mientras que las demás expuestas han sido estudiadas una y otra vez. Creo que estaba mejor en el artículo secundario. Ya me dirás que opinas. Un saludo.--Garrondo (talk) 07:43, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Hola otra vez, Garrondo. No sólo ha sido propuesto como hipótesis sino que ya hay resultados positivos de ensayos clínicos confirmando la causalidad. Por ejemplo . Desde luego es un ensayo clínico pequeño, pero a la vista de estos resultados, se puede decir que, de todas las hipótesis que aparecen en esa sección del artículo, ésta es la que está mejor fundada. Si borramos ésta hipótesis, deberíamos borrar todas las demás para ser coherentes en el nivel de exigencia.--Juansempere (talk) 08:59, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Ok. En ese caso tenemos que buscar mejores referencias que muestren que existe cierto consenso sobre esta hipótesis.
 * Voy a pasar a discutir esto en la página de comentarios del artículo y en inglés para que otros puedan dar su opinión. En resumen me sigue pareciendo una hipótesis interesante pero que por ahora es específica a un solo grupo de investigación, no ha sido revisada en fuentes terciarias, y por tanto a día de hoy parece minoritaria (ya veremos en el futuro).--Garrondo (talk) 13:13, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Vale. Es verdad que tiene más sentido discutirlo allí.--Juansempere (talk) 06:53, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Ayer no tuve tiempo. Si puedo escribiré hoy mis pensamientos.Un saludo.--Garrondo (talk) 07:51, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Acabo de sacar el tema en la página del artículo. A partir de ahora comentaré solo ahí y en inglés. Un saludo.--Garrondo (talk) 13:24, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Poser criteria
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Poser criteria, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mult-sclerosis.org/Posercriteria.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:12, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi Coren. Both MS encyclopaedia and me copied the text from a medical article. Anyway, as far as I know that information is copirighted by the autor of the article and could also be copied under fair use from the given external link. Regards.


 * Building an entire article on a quote under "Fair Use" is not permitted. See WP:NFC: Brief quotations of copyrighted text may be used to illustrate a point, establish context, or attribute a point of view or idea. Copyrighted text that is used verbatim must be attributed with quotation marks or other standard notation, such as block quotes. Any alterations must be clearly marked, i.e. [brackets] for added text, an ellipsis (...) for removed text, and emphasis noted after the quotation as "(emphasis added)" or "(emphasis in the original)". Extensive quotation of copyrighted text is prohibited. Building the article on quoted material exclusively leaves other editors only two choices: either not to touch the material in any way, or remove it.
 * There is no discernible reason why the article could not be rewritten in original wording (one that would be accessible to the layman, preferably).
 * Also note that even if you believe you may have a fair use case, our contributions aren't weighed by that standard but by our own policies, which have a higher bar for inclusion.
 * The article has been deleted accordingly. Regards, MLauba (talk) 09:29, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * OK. I understand that the problem is the tabular format copied from MS-encyclopedia. Therefore if I write the article myself using directly the medical article as source no copyright problem exist. Please confirm this point and I will write the article again.--Juansempere (talk) 22:06, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Juansempere
Whoops! automation at it least finest! My apologies!Vinithehat (talk) 22:39, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * What was that???
 * Me screwing something up. Sorry! I hope nothing was affected!Vinithehat (talk) 01:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Edits on Rotation (mathematics)
I just reverted your changes on Rotation (mathematics) as they were both factually incorrect. For the first e.g. it's easy to define a rotation with no fixed plane. E.g. the matrix (excuse my layout)

((0,6, 0,8, 0, 0) (-0,8, 0,6, 0, 0) (0, 0, 0.707, -0.707) (0, 0, 0.707, 0.707))

defines one such rotation. This is already described in the article.

On your second edit there are only 6 degrees of freedom of a 4D rotation, provable various ways depending how you describe your rotations. JohnBlackburne (talk) 22:11, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Email
If you go to my user page. On the left user toobox you will see a link that says email this user. Send me your email and I will send you the paper tomorrow. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:03, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

File:SpherePreceding.gif missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:SpherePreceding.gif is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:27, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Eulerframe.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Eulerframe.svg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Object pool1.png
Thank you for uploading File:Object pool1.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:50, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Object pool1.png
Thank you for uploading File:Object pool1.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:36, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Classification rule


The article Classification rule has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A total disaster which confuses hypothesis testing with classification

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JA(000)Davidson (talk) 17:13, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Masitinib


The article Masitinib has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Ob tund Talk 17:53, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Now you have it sourced. If you had take the time to read my comments, you could have found that it was a translation of a german article, which was properly linked. Please read things before writing comments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juansempere (talk • contribs) 18:03, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Masitinib. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ''It seems you have been creating pages which is great, though you don't have any sources. Please begin using sources in your pages, or you will be given a warning.'' Ob tund Talk 17:58, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Now you have it sourced. If you had take the time to read my comments, you could have found that it was a translation of a german article, which was properly linked. Please read things before writing comments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juansempere (talk • contribs) 18:03, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I did see your comments, all I was doing was checking. Ob tund Talk 18:17, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=561413810 your edit] to Demyelinating disease may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:56, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * s disease]] and the similar diseases called idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating diseases

Please use
Secondary sources as refs per WP:MEDRS. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 16:24, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Taking care of the Euler angles article ?
As you know I have spent more than one year in 2011 - 2012 trying to improve that article, with your active supervisory. I have no more time nor the motivation to engage editing wars. I simply suggest you to carefully reread the article as it was in May 2012 and as it is now. Perhaps there are formal ameliorations, but I think the effort we made to clarify the distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic interpretation of the global matrix, has been mostly destroyed or rendered contradictory ( see introduction of the matrix table ...). It is up to you or other motivated editors to act.Chessfan (talk) 17:26, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Linux Unified Kernel


A tag has been placed on Linux Unified Kernel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 08:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Diabetes (disambiguation)
Thank you for your contributions, Juansempere! Your edits to Diabetes (disambiguation) were successful, but have been reverted because the DI about which you wrote is already mentioned on the page, and disambiguation pages never hold "References" sections nor footnotes. Please read WP:DAB for more information. ''Thank you! and Best of everything to you and yours! – Paine'' 23:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
 * OK. Agreed. But both types of diabetes should appear in the introduction. And a note explaining the reason of the polysemy should also appear.
 * The introduction is reserved for the the primary topic, and since DM is far more common than DI, DM is in the intro as that primary topic. Also, since disambiguation pages are not articles and are provided to readers to help them navigate, they are kept as terse and concise as possible.  Again, a read of WP:DAB will lead you to the explanations you seek. – Paine  07:20, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * You are wrong. The introduction is not reserved for the primary topic. Please read again the link you sent me and this:


 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Disambiguation_pages#Introductory_line
 * I agree that disambiguation pages should be kept as terse and concise as possible, but they should not avoid the disambiguation!!! I think that is obvious!!!


 * Just check again the Manual of style: "The term being disambiguated should be in bold (not italics). It should begin a sentence fragment ending with a colon, introducing a bulleted list"


 * And this does not contradict your comments about the primary topic issue.

Reference errors on 21 June
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Neuromyelitis optica page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=668012164 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F668012164%7CNeuromyelitis optica%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for November 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ADEM. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=692596052 your edit] to Nosology may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:54, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * COSTART (Coding Symbols for Thesaurus of Adverse Reaction Terms) or MedDRA Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities  Medical Coding in Clinical Trials, Deven Babre, Perspect Clin Res. 2010 Jan-Mar; 1(1): 29–32.

Disambiguation link notification for January 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pathology of multiple sclerosis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sclerosis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

 * please help translate this message into the local language

Thanks again :) -- Doc James  along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 03:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 8 March
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Pathology of multiple sclerosis page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=709031446 your edit] caused a DOI error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F709031446%7CPathology of multiple sclerosis%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for April 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ADEM. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magnetic resonance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Rotation matrix into Angular displacement. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:37, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Generics
We do not capitalize these. Best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 17:59, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

 * please help translate this message into your local language via meta

Thanks again :-) --  Doc James  along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

DIRECT-MS listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect DIRECT-MS. Since you had some involvement with the DIRECT-MS redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Deli nk (talk) 19:58, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Statistical hypothesis testing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Proving a negative ([//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Statistical_hypothesis_testing check to confirm] | [//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Statistical_hypothesis_testing?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AntiMOG associated encephalomyelitis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBA ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/AntiMOG_associated_encephalomyelitis check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/AntiMOG_associated_encephalomyelitis?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anti-MOG associated encephalomyelitis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NMO ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Anti-MOG_associated_encephalomyelitis check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Anti-MOG_associated_encephalomyelitis?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 23
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * GDP-L-fucose synthase ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/GDP-L-fucose_synthase check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/GDP-L-fucose_synthase?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to HLA
 * Inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Inflammatory_demyelinating_diseases_of_the_central_nervous_system check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Inflammatory_demyelinating_diseases_of_the_central_nervous_system?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to HLA

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited GDP-L-fucose synthase, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HLA ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/GDP-L-fucose_synthase check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/GDP-L-fucose_synthase?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Come join us
A lot of folks who like improving Wikipedia's medicine-related articles hang out at WT:MED. Please feel free to drop by and join the conversation. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:06, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Multiple sclerosis research, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Schilder's disease ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Multiple_sclerosis_research check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Multiple_sclerosis_research?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:26, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anti-AQP4 disease, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Optic-spinal MS ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Anti-AQP4_disease check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Anti-AQP4_disease?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Multiple sclerosis research
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2211034819300380 and other journal articles not released under a compatible license. Here is a link to the bot report. Click on the iThenticate link to view the overlap. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 20:58, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Management of multiple sclerosis Featured article review
I have nominated Management of multiple sclerosis for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  02:59, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)