User talk:Jucypsycho

Your submission at Articles for creation
Your nomination at Articles for Creation was declined, and Wikipedia& was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to request article creation again once the issues have been addressed. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! &mdash; The Earwig   (talk)  14:26, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Chart2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chart2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 10:00, 10 June 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 10:00, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Cluster chart.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cluster chart.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 10:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 10:01, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
Your nomination at Articles for Creation was declined, and Wikipedia& was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to request article creation again once the issues have been addressed. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Chzz  ► 21:31, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Welcome and introduction
Hi, Jucypsycho. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck!  Chzz  ► 04:21, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Notes and links, per discussion on IRC
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" ! How references work

Simple references
These require two parts;


 * a)

Chzz is 98 years old.

He likes tea.


 * b) A section called "References" with the special code " ";

Named references
Chzz was born in 1837, in Footown.

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

Citation templates
You can put anything you like between, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals.

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.
 * }

 Chzz  ► 04:21, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * No original research
 * Link to the project group: WikiProject_Statistics

Educational data mining
Hi,

as far as I can tell, you put a lot of information onto the cluster analysis page about the use of it in educational research. I recently cleaned up cluster analysis, and since the article is already very long, there is not much room for applications such as in education. I moved the contents over to educational data mining, which seems much more appropriate to me.

However, apparently an editor active there has also major concerns, and in fact dropped the whole section right away. I told him that I don't consider this appropriate behaviour, but that is essentially something you need to sort out there, with the other editors who have an interest in educational data mining. You should try to reach a consensus on what information should be there for an encyclopedic article, and what not. I figure that a key concern - pretty much the same I had for cluster analysis was that it was just way too much content.

So please, have a look at that article, and try to help getting it into a nicer Wikipedia-kind-of-shape. Thank you. --Chire (talk) 21:30, 5 October 2011 (UTC)