User talk:Judge Dred Scott

Your contributed article, Freedom, Inc


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Freedom, Inc. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Freedom, Inc.. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Freedom, Inc. - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. MikeWazowski (talk) 06:02, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Freedom, Inc. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MikeWazowski (talk) 06:04, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I have not attacked anyone. Judge Dred Scott (talk) 06:05, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. MikeWazowski (talk) 06:15, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiptoety talk 06:25, 17 February 2012 (UTC)


 * 48 hours is enough time to chill. Judge Dred Scott (talk) 06:26, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia
Hello, and welcome,

I ran across Leon Jordan at the Articles for Deletion debate and immediately recognized that the article should be kept and expanded, not deleted. I have been working on it today, and hope that you approve of my efforts. I noticed that you tried to create Freedom, Inc. and that it was deleted. I see that you got into a tangle with another editor and got blocked for 48 hours.

My welcome to you is sincere, and I think that an article about Freedom, Inc. is appropriate, but it will need to be solidly referenced. I encourage you to avoid any personal attacks or accusations against other editors. Please assume that experienced editors are acting in good faith, unless you have excellent reasons to think otherwise. In particular, attempts to delete incomplete or poorly-referenced articles happen all the time here, on articles on every topic imaginable. This in not a sign of bad faith, but rather an effort to keep junk out of the encyclopedia. I usually work on a new article in a sandbox until it has several good solid references, then I move it to main space. You may find WP:PRIMER to be a good introduction to editing Wikipedia. Please let me know if I can be of assistance.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  23:15, 19 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I just saw your latest efforts at Leon Jordan and went to email you, but see I needn't. My responses three nights ago represented impaired judgment, I accept your explanation that an attempt to delete an article on a noteworthy subject is not necessarily bad faith at all, but a good faith effort to keep Wikipedia sophisticated. I greatly approve of your work on the Leon M. Jordan article (possibly, the name of it should be changed to Leon M. Jordan btw), and plan to reintroduce Freedom Inc. with considerably more information than the rejected version. Judge Dred Scott (talk) 23:44, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

More information needed about File:LucileBlufordPhotos1.jpg
Hello, !

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:LucileBlufordPhotos1.jpg. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 20 February 2012 (UTC)


 * nice way of putting it, for a bot. Judge Dred Scott (talk) 06:26, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

More information needed about File:LucileBlufordPhotos2.jpg
Hello, !

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:LucileBlufordPhotos2.jpg. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:BlufordBust.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BlufordBust.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:35, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Lucile Bluford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Segregation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, back. I'll leave these bot messages because they are polite and assume good faith. Props to their creators. Judge Dred Scott (talk) 13:54, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:LucileBlufordPhotos1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:LucileBlufordPhotos1.jpg, which you've sourced to (poster). I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:LucileBlufordPhotos2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:LucileBlufordPhotos2.jpg, which you've sourced to (posters). I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:56, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

You're invited to Wikipedia Takes St. Louis!


Dust off your Polaroid camera and pack your best lenses. The first-ever Wikipedia Takes St. Louis photo hunt kicks off Sat, Sept. 15, at 12:30pm in downtown St. Louis. Tour the streets of the Rome of the West with other Wikipedians and even learn a little St. Louis history. This event is a fun and collaborative way to enhance St. Louis articles with visual content. Novice photographers welcome! Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 22:20, 1 September 2012 (UTC)