User talk:Judicatus/Archives/2008/April

WP:AIV report
Hello there! I'm just here about your recent AIV report. I removed it, as the user was only warned once and only edited twice; please do not declare editors as vandals so quickly. It is much safer to give a user more warnings (preferably four, at least three), because that allows for more room for them to desist or stop of their own accord. After all, we're not looking to block everyone; blocks should be handed out only if they're really necessary. Cheers, Master of Puppets   Call me MoP! ☺  00:10, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

???
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Constable&diff=next&oldid=187596483 Was that vandalism I did? Or were you just trying to revert the other guy and reverted me by mistake?] -- Alisyn talk 01:03, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * No worries ^_^. Just wondering. I was confused too. -- Alisyn talk 01:06, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

..
Hey, what's up with editing "wanna be" to "want to-be" on the discussion page? Wasn't a spelling error if I intended to spell it that way. ;-)--Tainted Drifter (talk) 06:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

It's cool, man.--Tainted Drifter (talk) 22:47, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

April 2008
Thank you for making a report on Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you! Toddst1 (talk) 00:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

I fixed a userbox on your page
...with AWB and it also made some other changes, replacing every instance of & # 8226 ; with •. Cosmetically, it looks the same, but I just thought I should let you know in case there was a reason for the #8226 business. Cheers, xenocidic (talk) 02:08, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

curious...
why did you subst all your userboxen? xenocidic (talk) 16:54, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Hrm... gotcha. was just wondering. Thanks for the response. xenocidic (talk) 18:10, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and thanks for reading =) Happy editing, xenocidic (talk) 18:32, 24 April 2008 (UTC)