User talk:Judithcomm

Hi Judith,

Thanks. We did a fair bit of research on it, over two months in Mallorca.

Yes, I can do that. I certainly have pictures of Cala Blanca, ('Ladder Bay'), which I don't think is on the Commons, and I have pictures of Cala d'en Monjo, (of the ruin/foundations of 'Daphne's Hotel' that is), also not on the Commons. I have the Raixa, Cala de Deiá, Sa Dragonera, and Sant Elm, but they seem to be pretty well covered already. Nevertheless, I'll sort them out, and put them all on, no problem.

OK, so now for the interesting part. The picture in the link is looking E.N.E., up the north side of the Formentor Peninsula, towards the lighthouse. This exact location is first used in the montage of scenes setting up the location of each character just prior to the murder, (approx. 48mins). The lighthouse can be seen in the distance. The film seems to suggest that it is above 'Ladder Bay', (Cala Blanca), (Poirot suggests that Daphne must have passed Ladder Bay on her walk to the lighthouse), however Cala Blanca is actually 50 miles away, about the longest possible distance between two points in Mallorca. The same shot is used again, about 30mins later as Poirot begins his walk around the island, timing himself between the various locations linked to the murder. A walk that in reality, would have been around 75 miles long, taking in Formentor, Cala Blanca, and Raixa. The beach used for the 'Gull Cove Scene', (where Christine Redfern is creating an alibi for herself with the young Linda Marshall), is Cala en Feliu, also on the Formentor Peninsula. It is on the other side of the small peninsula, (the south side), only a couple of kilometers away from the linked photo. I was aware of the scene and its location, but I didn't know that there was a photo of it on the Commons.

Hope this helps.
 * Hi, how nice to hear from you. I found another spot in the film, where Poirot steps very close to the edge to look down into the water, like Christine would have done to be able to see Linda. I recognised the small island, but cannot establish exactly where Poirot was standing; it's on a different angle than the photographer. It's on Formentor as well: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Es_Colomer-14877892455.jpg --Judithcomm (talk) 09:19, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks
Many thanks for all the work you've been doing recently on Jekyll/Lutyens images, including for Munstead Wood. I just created a new article, Folly Farm, Sulhamstead, using some of your recently uploaded pics. I'd been hoping for a while that pics for that house would turn up! -- Aegoceras (talk) 18:05, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for leaving me this note. Are you expecially interested in the work of Jekyll and Lutyens? My interest here is film locations. Both houses have been used in the tv series "Rosemary & Thyme" and I was annoyed to find that no media were available. And now there are. Do you happen to know more about the Cenotaph of Sigismunda? I would like to know if this cat is sleeping on it. About this cat I'm certain, because Jekyll herself says so in her book. --Judithcomm (talk) 12:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, I've been creating a number of articles on Lutyens houses, including Munstead Wood - I couldn't believe no-one else had! Currently I don't know more about the Cenotaph of Sigismunda than I put in the article, I'm afraid. The chapter in Jekyll's book that contains the cat photo doesn't describe it so I suppose its unprovable, until another photo turns up showing exactly the same seat and is captioned as being the cenotaph... -- Aegoceras (talk) 18:00, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Bazaar of Isfahan into Grand Bazaar, Isfahan. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:32, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Judithcomm, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Dhunge Dhara have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:16, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pratap Malla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kal Bhairab ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Pratap_Malla check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Pratap_Malla?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! Nice to hear from you --Judithcomm (talk) 13:30, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Judithcomm

Thank you for creating Nagbahal Hiti.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:32, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks! --Judithcomm (talk) 23:42, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)