User talk:Judyelizabethfye

Welcome!
Hello, Judyelizabethfye, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! TomStar81 (Talk) 14:21, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Judyelizabethfye. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Radiation Research, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Every morning  (there's a halo...)  19:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Radiation Research Society
Hello Judyelizabethfye,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Radiation Research Society for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Slatersteven (talk) 18:24, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Radiation Research Society


A tag has been placed on Radiation Research Society, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:07, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Radiation Research Society
Hello, Judyelizabethfye,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Radiation Research Society should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Radiation Research Society.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Slatersteven (talk) 11:30, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Radiation Research Society


A tag has been placed on Radiation Research Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.radres.org/?page=Governance. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:26, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Copyright and conflict of interest
Thank you for your interest in creating an article for Radiation Research Society on Wikipedia. There are multiple problems with your submission. You cannot post copyrighted material on Wikipedia even if you are the copyright holder, unless special licensing permissions are in place. In short, a copyright owner cannot offer Wikipedia a one-time license for use. Rather, the copyright to the material has to be released – permanently and irrevocably – into the public domain or under a free copyright license that is compatible with Wikipedia's licenses. This is because Wikipedia aims to be freely distributable and copyable by anyone, so all content must be licensed for that purpose. You can learn more about this policy at Copyrights. The second problem is conflict of interest. Writing an article about your own organization or that of a client is strongly discouraged, as it is difficult to maintain the required neutral point of view.

If you'd like to use the copyrighted content in an article, you can follow the instructions at Requesting copyright permission on how to obtain the proper licensing. If you are the copyright holder, refer to Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for how to grant us permission to use your content. Alternatively, you could write a new article that does not closely paraphrase the material available online. See Copying text from other sources for more information. However you would then still have to abide by the conflict of interest guideline. In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

I'm sorry this message could not be more favourable. If you have any questions, you can leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:40, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

talk page advice
You do not need to keep starting up new threads as to why a page should not be deleted. It will be enough to reply to peoples responses to your last thread on that topic.Slatersteven (talk) 16:26, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

My apologies, I am just learning the how to navigate within the Wiki system. Judy
 * For starters, if you've already got a section header reply under the header with parenthesis or with stars (press and hold shift and then press the number 8) to indent, that shows the replies and the replies to the replies and so forth in that manner. It is much easier on admin eyes (and admin sanity) to track discussions in this way because it allows us to follow things with greater ease. Now, on to more pressing matters:
 * Your article's copyvio csd tag has been removed on grounds that the website its borrowing content from has no explicit copyright tag out for the public viewing, which means that speedy deletion for copyright violation is presently unjustifiable. That being said, there is no reason why another, more relevant speedy deletion tag can't be added to the article for administrator consideration.
 * The afd opened for the article is another though, that is beyond my ability to close and the issues there need to be addressed if you want the article to stay - and from where I sit that's gonna be a long shot at best because the article looks like it needs help. A lot of it. If you want the article here you're gonna need to find third party sources and add them to the article, then give use a good rewrite so we can see why the article should be kept.
 * Lastly, if you are in any way, shape, or form associated with this group then you need to cough that up right now - and I do mean right now. Conflict of Interest-based editors are subject to certain restrictions and are required to make a declaration of their conflict on the user pages or talk pages for community consideration, and failure to do so at this point will result in your being blocked/banned down the road. This is your one and only chance to get ahead of it before it comes back to haunt you, so make it count.
 * If you need any help, or if you have any questions/comments/concerns, drop me a line or leave a message at the help desk and someone will get back to you. Although not strictly speaking relevant to your cause you may also wish to look through WikiProject Military history/Academy, there's alot of content in there for first timers who are attempting to navigate the Wiki-waters and by most counts its been helpful. TomStar81 (Talk) 13:22, 16 April 2018 (UTC)