User talk:Judygreenberg

Hello everybody. I specialize in linguistics and history, and I hope to contribute in these areas. Judygreenberg (talk) 02:56, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

re Lepcis Magna
Hello Judygreenberg. Thanks for the Arabic name fix on this article. Appreciated! Herostratus (talk) 20:52, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Asmara
In regards to your changes to Asmara http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Asmara&diff=prev&oldid=395852102

1. This is not a 'Native script variant name,' as you have previously stated, as Tigrigna does not use the letter ሥ, but it uses ስ regularly. In Eritrea this is always the standard even for direct Ge'ez loan-words which used the former spelling.

2. In all native use, Asmara is spelled ኣስመራ, your citation is not an example of native use.

3. Your citation directly denies any claims of it's accuracy. "The information regarding ኣሥመራ in Eritrea on this page is published from the data supplied by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, a member of the Intelligence community of the United States of America, and a Department of Defense (DoD) Combat Support Agency. No claims are made regarding the accuracy of ኣሥመራ information contained here."

4. You have not even answered my question on the relevance of this link http://www.geographic.org/geographic_names/name.php?uni=-879451&fid=1676&c=eritrea (the geographic coordinates of a random church). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mesfin (talk • contribs) 14:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

5. I would also like to add that the letter ሥ is kept only in Ethiopia, where it (in addition to ስ) is still used in Amharic; also that "Ye’Inglīz Bēte Kristīyan" is clearly Amharic too. This provides additional evidence of it's irrelevance, as Amharic is a foreign language in Eritrea. Mesfin (talk) 14:35, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

The variant names from the US National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency are built into the global positioning system (GPS), which is currently used by developers of GPS military and consumer applications. Please do not remove them. Judygreenberg (talk) 03:44, 22 November 2010 (UTC).

Yes, indeed ኣሥመራ is a foreign word in that sense, but so is the English word "Asmara". Yet, Ethiopian or not, it is part of the database used by the global GPS system, and so it can be useful to, say, someone traveling to Asmara from Ethiopia, when the local GPS application uses that alphabet. The word "Amharic" does NOT mean irrelevant, no matter how irrelevant it may seem to you. Please do not allow personal feelings of nationalism to color your decisions regarding your decisions as to what is useful to others. (Judygreenberg (talk) 06:30, 25 November 2010 (UTC))

The relevance of the link is that it is a reference showing the source of the information. The information on that page comes from the US National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. See http://geonames.nga.mil/ggmagaz/. That cannot be the reference link, because it is a search engine which does not produce a separate page for the name requested, whereas the geographic.org pages are separate for each name. You can verify the accuracy of the information in geographic.org, by entering the name ASMARA in the NGIA search engine. The results are consistent with the name variant entries that I added to the Asmara article.(Judygreenberg (talk) 06:41, 25 November 2010 (UTC))


 * See Asmara talk Mesfin (talk) 11:56, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Occupations of physicians and surgeons
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Occupations of physicians and surgeons, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://occupationalinfo.org/defset1_6643.html, https://www.aamc.org/download/151890/data/table39usscherasspecialtybysex2010bb.pdf. As a copyright violation, Occupations of physicians and surgeons appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Occupations of physicians and surgeons has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Occupations of physicians and surgeons and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Occupations of physicians and surgeons with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Occupations of physicians and surgeons.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Lagrange613 17:13, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

The Dictionary of Occupational Titles is in the Public Domain
Regarding the contents of the Dictionary of Occupational Titles, copied from occupationalinfo.org, please note the notice posted on the main page of that website:

"This is the complete Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT) revised fourth edition, as supplied electronically by the US Dept. of Labor.." and:

Judygreenberg (talk) 09:52, 2 January 2012 (UTC)