User talk:Judyta85

Wikinger
Please don't. Don't create more accounts. Don't try to "clean up" anything. Just leave things alone. Here and elsewhere. Just do absolutely nothing at all on Wikipedia. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:34, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, and it seems you didn't "cease and desist" anyway. You were editing yet another foreign-language wiki just today, creating the same old series of pseudo-articles on mr-wiki. Have you got any idea at all what you were writing there, in Marathi? It appears you again just blindly copied over text, without any consideration of whether the result would be either factually or grammatically correct. What is it saying there, currently, that Latin "t" derives from Sampi? That Latin "m" derives from San? Come on, man, you know that's not true. Look, some other people on this project don't just care about having a big nice series of articles and a big nice ordered list. We care about things that are said in articles being actually true. And you seem to not care about that at all. Please stop making such edits. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:49, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

This account is one of my old sleepers-I wanted to use them constructively, like this one. So what's now? If you are telling me to do absolutely nothing at all on Wikipedia, you are excluding me from it in its entirety. Is there any possibility to officially redirect all unwanted editors like me to Wikinfo to show them some editing alternative to Wikipedia which no longer wants them? I propose make such template:

EXAMPLE BEGIN EXAMPLE END

and post it routinely into userpages of all socks blocked and banned by you such as: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=Future+Perfect+at+Sunrise&page=&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&hide_patrol_log=1&hide_review_log=1

In this way you will drive them all effectively into Wikinfo, and they having this alternative, will rather don't return here. I think that main reason behind returns of all blocked users lies in their unknowledge of wiki alternatives. Do you accept such templating proposal? As of edits in other exotic non-Latin/non-Greek/non-Cyrillic wikis, I did them because I like have things perfected in all places where they are possible, leaving chaotic imperfection to Latin/Greek/Cyrillic wikis, where you firmly WP:OWNs Greek things. Let's exotic solutions will thrive in exotic places, when they can't thrive in common places. Maybe something interesting will result from them in future? As of letter derivation, I treat its area as randomly fluctuating, because the same shape can at once mean various phonemes, see:

note: some glyphs you are still missing from it in Greek_epigraphic_letters note: you already based Greek_epigraphic_letters on it
 * http://www.parthia.com/fonts/letterforms_usage.htm
 * http://poinikastas.csad.ox.ac.uk/browseGlyphs.shtml

so I explore closest possible cognate glyphs in this area, namely between Greek and Latin, which is much better than loose fluctuation mentioned especially in http://www.parthia.com/fonts/letterforms_usage.htm, which can result in extreme cases, where Λ at once means alpha10, gamma08, delta04, Τ at once means tau, sampi03, Μ at once means mu06, san, Ͱ at once means epsilon04, eta07, rho03, tau04, phi06, etc... As you see, allowed fluctuation continuum in "parthia" website covers shape derivation equalizing between tau and sampi, along with mu and san. As you see, I am not putting anything like PURE FICTION here. One of my reasons behind sticking with Unicode in Greek alphabet is abovementioned meaning fluctuation fact from "parthia" website, which is avoided by Unicode. Judyta85 (talk) 17:39, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Formerly unknown to me, WP:OUT template problem was solved at User talk:Chen Wenyuan. Judyta85 (talk) 09:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)