User talk:Jughead Joe

Welcome!
Hello, Jughead Joe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page USS Okinawa (LPH-3) have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. BilCat (talk) 05:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Help me!
Hi there, I cleared out your help request because it was blank. If you still need help, feel free to post it again with your question. Thanks! Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  03:36, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Operation Eagle Claw - 1980
I will learn the rules here and closely monitor others input for possible rejection.Jughead Joe (talk) 01:12, 10 May 2017 (UTC) Bilcat can contact me directly at 267-242-7845 cell and help stop impeding historic accounts.Jughead Joe (talk) 01:06, 10 May 2017 (UTC) Why would I need to document it as it already is? I'm simply adding details and participants. I hold the Marine Corps Expeditionary Medal from that Op. Who's this guy Bilcat and was he there? I'm not seeing an easy way to respond to him

Please help me with... Reinstate my previous edits, they were done after fact-checking by me via google. Can someone help me out here, and to also help post photos I took aboard USS Mobile for the period comprising Operation Eagle Claw? I've already done this naming the ships involved. 2nd LT John Wissler was aboard Mobile then and now leads FMFLANT as a Lt General - see his page from MARFORCOM that mentions Eagle Claw and MSSG-31. This is known history - why is anyone seeking citations? Further, do I need additional witnesses to my first hand experience? Mine were short yet eventful and largely backed up by the historical record. Anyhow I do have many photos and wish to share them. Btw I went out with the next 31st MEU with LHA-1 Tarawa and have pics of that also. I understand the LHA class is still alive and well with the enhanced amphibs America and Tripoli. The Pearl Harbor Sub Base chow hall ranked as one of the best, though for different reasons than CINCPACFLT's Camp Smith Dining Hall which was exemplary in every way on the occasions they honored our Kaneohe Bay chow cards on holidays a few times like on Thanksgiving or Easter. I recall there at Camp Smith's dining hall, high up overlooking Pearl Harbor, a lone female MasterGunnerySgt, 3 stripes up and 4 under with bursting bombs between giving us a kind smile and nod. She seemed lonely as were we despite being in paradise.

I'm working on your help request. Here is the talk for Bilcat User talk:BilCat Also, use for Bilcat to come here. Thanks,DoABarrelRoll.dev(Constable of the WikiPolice) 06:53, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

(FromWP:V) In Wikipedia, verifiability means that other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it.[1] However, while verifiability is required for including something, it is not a reason for inclusion.[under discussion] When reliable sources disagree, maintain a neutral point of view and present what the various sources say, giving each side its due weight.

All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed.

Base articles on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Source material must have been published, the definition of which for our purposes is "made available to the public in some form".[6] Unpublished materials are not considered reliable. Use sources that directly support the material presented in an article and are appropriate to the claims made. The appropriateness of any source depends on the context. The best sources have a professional structure in place for checking or analyzing facts, legal issues, evidence, and arguments. The greater the degree of scrutiny given to these issues, the more reliable the source. Be especially careful when sourcing content related to living people or medicine.DoABarrelRoll.dev(Constable of the WikiPolice) 07:08, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Jughead Joe (talk) 05:54, 6 May 2017 (UTC) Jughead Joe (talk) 05:54, 6 May 2017 (UTC)