User talk:Juhachi/Archive 6

to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:31, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Koi to Senkyo to Chocolate
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:02, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Today Is A Beautiful Day
Hello! Your submission of Today Is A Beautiful Day at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Lionratz (talk) 04:29, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I am really sorry for my error. I just took a swift look at the history and made a hasty decision based on that. Really, I don;t know why I keep on making this mistake. I will re-look at the nomination again later. Many apologies.--Lionratz (talk) 04:44, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * By the way, I was not the one who reviewed Koi to Senkyo to Chocolate, so please do not put the blame on me. Thanks.--Lionratz (talk) 04:53, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

=December=

DYK for Today Is A Beautiful Day
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Last Exile Sequel article was created without dicussion.
Previously, the article to the anime Last Exile and it's sequel, Last Exile: Fam, The Sliver Wing were both located at the same page. But User Squirrellyboy created and redirected the Last Exile: Fam, The Sliver Wing section to it's own article without notice or discussing in the Last Exile Talk page. Should this kind of action be allowed without everyone's approval? And is it necessary to create another article for the Last Exile sequel when both shows share the same plot, settings and characters? I hope you can look into this this.

PS: I tried contacting Squirrellyboy about this matter but there has been no response.--FonFon Alseif (talk) 10:31, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Little Busters
I didn't upload any file or copied any text etc, why was the edit regarding the translation patch removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonynonymousity (talk • contribs) 10:45, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nanoha A's logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Nanoha A's logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 10:49, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

DASHBot
Out of purest curiosity, seeing as you have been a victim of DASHBot too, by what criteria does it drop a graphic from one page but not another? Though as near as I can tell, the criteria for posting the scanned cover art of Toradora is the same for Golden Time. The only difference I can see is that it appears the image posted on the Toradora page was imported from another web site, whereas the image posted on the Golden Time page was self-scanned. Same size, same (degraded) quality, so theoretically the same "fair use" qualification, right? Or wrong? FWIW, the "Golden Time" page is not in the main wiki. I discovered several weeks after the fact that a friend and ally had recreated the page in his user space, unbeknownst to me. I found it in Google, and have since kept it up to date. I wasn't going to restore the page until you guys told me it was OK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rpapo (talk • contribs) 23:23, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * You can't have fair-use images in userspace. A bot searches for these and removes them.--  十  八  23:37, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the quick response. It seems strange to me that they would be more stringent about user space than about public space, but they set the rules...  --Rpapo (talk) 23:48, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Altima (band)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Altima (band), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://rateyourmusic.com/list/TheScientist/rym_ultimate_box_set__trance.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:38, 27 December 2011 (UTC)