User talk:Juicebrighton

Hello, Juicebrighton. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Juice 107.2, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.Charles (talk) 23:18, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Corrections to Juice 107.2
Dear Charles. Thank you for pointing out the correct method for posting amendments, corrections and additions to the Juice 107.2 Wikipedia entry and apologies for inadvertently adding inappropriate subjective comment or hyperbole.

The current entry does however contain a number of material inaccuracies. Juice 107.2 is not available on DAB as stated but the connected station and a completely separate service, Smile Sussex is. A link on the page that mentions Forever Broadcasting erroneously links through UTV Radio. Simon Fanshawe is cited as 'the director of the company' whereas he was was brought in by the founders as a Non Executive Chairman at launch.

There is also additional information about connected parties; 'sister radio stations', 'record labels' current and past personnel including DJs, founders, directors that is not present. Ofcom's 'promise of performance' cites 'A locally oriented contemporary music and information station with features reflecting the culture, particularly the youth culture of the area' rather than 'playing MOR dance music, pop music and commercial classics' - which is inaccurate.

Would it be appropriate to study Wikipedia's guidelines very closely and then attempt to provide an updated entry with suitable accreditation and references to, for example, newspaper and trade journal articles and the Ofcom documentation already referred to?

Thank you

Juicebrighton (talk) 18:17, 2 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi. This account will most likely be deleted because it uses the name of an organisation, which is not permitted. You will need to create a new account with a neutral name. Wikipedia generally requires that all information is referenced to independent secondary sources. We do not want personal information from insiders. We do not care about every presenter and DJ, only who meet Wikipedia's notability standards. We do not need program schedules and stuff that can be found on the stations own website. I suggest you put a note on the article talkpage to explain that you are involved with the station and why the changes are needed before making them. And please avoid hyperbole and puffery.Charles (talk) 18:40, 2 December 2014 (UTC)