User talk:JuicefineAM

February 2016
Your recent editing history at Bowdoin College shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.You cannot just escape sanctions by creating a new account, as you appear to have done. —C.Fred (talk) 01:40, 29 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Also, in this edit, you state that File:Bowdoin-quad.jpg is used on the Bowdoin website. In your upload summary for the file, you claim it as your own work. May we assume, then, that you are an employee or contractor of Bowdoin College or otherwise have a conflict of interest with it? —C.Fred (talk) 01:55, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

@C.Fred No, I am not an employee of the College. What do you mean by breaking sanctions? Look at the talk page of Bowdoin College. It is being vandalized by users when the original version of the page, which had existed for 5+ years, was completely valid.


 * But the aerial photo is your own work? You've asserted that it is. When did you take it, how, from what platform, with what camera...? —C.Fred (talk) 03:11, 29 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I took it 7-8 years ago on my Nikon D300.


 * As for avoiding sanctions, I mean that your account showed up very shortly after was warned for edit warring. —C.Fred (talk) 03:13, 29 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Edit warring? I looked through the history of that page, it seems like other users like Lacmaboingo (who have been banned) had destroyed the page. Meanwhile I have offered up my own work, and the page has been continually removed. What reasons can this before? —JuicefineAM


 * Your edits were not a clear revert of vandalism (which, as we noted, has a very specific meaning on Wikipedia) or any other exception to the three revert rule. Thus, you (the person, regardless of which account you use) may not revert the article more than three times in 24 hours. Instead, what the page has is a content dispute. Since multiple editors appear to support the change, you need to discuss the matter on the talk page to work toward finding a consensus version of the page. —C.Fred (talk) 03:42, 29 February 2016 (UTC)