User talk:Juju122

July 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Michael C. Hall has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Michael C. Hall was changed by Juju122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960784 on 2014-07-16T06:55:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:55, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Monte Smith. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 06:56, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adam Goldberg, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Adam Goldberg was changed by Juju122 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918359 on 2014-07-16T07:16:06+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:16, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adam Goldberg.  L smll  07:23, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:16, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Monte smith


A tag has been placed on Draft:Monte smith, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mosfetfaser (talk) 18:14, 16 July 2014 (UTC)