User talk:Jujutacular/Archive 16

File:Cuenca Cigars Outside Patio.jpg
Hey there! I'm working on verifying permission for use of the above noted file. To expedite the process, I am requesting restoration of the file. I appreciate your help. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me. Best regards, Cindy  ( talk ) 10:05, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅. Please let me know if permission cannot be verified, and I will delete the file again. Jujutacular (talk) 12:26, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FPlowres
Template:FPlowres has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Armbrust The Homunculus 21:11, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Commented there. Jujutacular (talk) 04:42, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

User:Jujutacular/closeFPC.js
I found a way to automate the FP count, which should make it a bit less prone to wander from true. This does break the current script, though, so I removed the now-unnecessary section. Could you please update from User:Adam_Cuerden/closeFPC.js? Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:35, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅! Thank you for the notification. Jujutacular (talk) 18:32, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * No worries! Thank you for being so quick! =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:18, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The edit summary contains the now redundant "Increment count" part. Could you remove it? Armbrust The Homunculus 15:29, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Done. Thank you, good catch. Jujutacular (talk) 15:41, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Mistinguett in 1912.jpg
Hello Jujutacular, long time no speak. Hope your OK and still on here. I see that you are an administrator and wonder if I could ask you some advice. The above file is currently proving a real headache at my latest FAC as it will not display the cropped version which I uploaded onto enWiki today. Basically, and to cut a long story short, I uploaded an image to Commons as I thought it would be PD. A rather invaluable reviewer who knows his stuff when it comes to images, has dropped in at the peer review and has advised me to move the image from Commons to EnWiki as the PD claim is questionable, but certainly old enough to consider so. My (our) problem is that no matter how many times we upload it, the cropped version will not stay up and it reverts to the image which was uploaded previously that shows where it was originally taken from. Obviously with an impending FAC, the cropped version would be a whole lot more preferable. Do you have any advice? Also, will the previous several thousand attempts to upload need to be trimmed down by an administrator? Best as always! --  Cassianto Talk   17:42, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey there! The cropped version appears to be showing up fine to me. It should just be showing her face, with the text below cropped off, correct? This sounds like an issue with your browser's cache, try following the instructions at WP:BYPASS. Jujutacular (talk) 18:12, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes that's correct. Wonderful thanks. I use Safari and this guide has been very helpful. All the best! --   Cassianto Talk   18:33, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Glad to help! I also cleaned up the revision history. Jujutacular (talk) 18:41, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * You're most kind. Does the cropped version now show as the most recent? --   Cassianto Talk   18:54, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, I deleted all but the most recent (cropped) upload. Jujutacular (talk) 19:12, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Looks all good. Thanks for your much valued help! --   Cassianto Talk   04:39, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Un-delete request
Hi there. On the 5th September, you deleted File:Internazionale.svg, because it was an unused non-free file. However, it was only unused because someone wrongly uploaded a free version and used that in the original file's place. When the 'free' file was inevitably for being non-free, the page became logo-less. Could you un-delete File:Internazionale.svg if at all possible? Cheers, Malpass93! (what I've been up to/drop me a ___) 19:51, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Done. Sorry for the wait, I've been traveling! Jujutacular (talk) 04:32, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Not a problem, Wikipedia has no deadline and all that! We've all (well, bots aside) got lives to live, so don't sweat it. Thanks! Malpass93! (what I've been up to/drop me a ___) 12:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Lieutenant FW Harvey DCM.jpg
Happy Wednesday! It is Wednesday, isn't it? Oy vey and ugh. Well, I'm working on verifying authorization for use of the above noted image. Could you help a chick out and restore the file to help expedite the process? Yes, forever grateful. My solemn vow. Cindy ( talk ) 21:06, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Happy Wednesday indeed! The image is now undeleted :) Jujutacular (talk) 21:21, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Books and Bytes Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013 by , Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved... New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted. New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis?? New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration Read the full newsletter ''Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:38, 27 October 2013 (UTC)''

File:John Gaps, 2013.jpg
Hey there! I'm working on verifying authorization for the file linked above. Hoping you can restore the file in order to expedite the process. I appreciate your help. If you have questions, please feel free to drop me a line. Best regards, Cindy  ( talk ) 17:38, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey Cindy! File restored :) Jujutacular (talk) 03:05, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Fictional beings and reference failure
Hi, I'm afraid your edit summary for restoring the page doesn't help me, could you tell me the exact reason? The way I see it, WP:R#DELETE 8 clearly applies here. All 26 Google hits are either spam or derived from Wikipedia, and Scholar comes up dry. Regards, Paradoctor (talk) 00:59, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey there! Specifically, WP:R #4 states: "You risk breaking incoming or internal links by deleting the redirect." The article was in existence for over 6 years under that name. It's very possible that the article was linked on external websites under that name during that time. Redirects are cheap, so if they are possibly useful, it's good practice to simply leave them be unless they are in some way harming the encyclopedia. Jujutacular (talk) 01:10, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm skeptical, especially after seeing the OpenSiteExplorer results. The internal links have been taken care of. If that doesn't convince you, I'll interpret this as WP:R#KEEP 5. ;) Happy editing, Paradoctor (talk) 01:55, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * That works for me! Cheers. Jujutacular (talk) 13:27, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

He's Just Not That Into You (film)
Thanks for your help with the page move. Now I'm taking a look at pages that link to the book and film, and some cleaning up needs to be done. The part I need help with is this link, because it too involves an existing redirect:


 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/He%27s_Just_Not_That_into_You

I think I can handle the rest, including this one:


 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:He%27s_Just_Not_That_into_You_cover.jpg

Thanks. -- Brangifer (talk) 07:45, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Done! Thanks for following up. Jujutacular (talk) 13:28, 14 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks! -- Brangifer (talk) 01:04, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Audios
Hello. Can you provide a little help in cutting the last second from "Last Rites-Loved to Death demo sample.ogg" and re-naming "Megadeth - Sweating Bullets sample.ogg" to "Sweating Bullets" since there are no songs or files under that name?--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I am unable at the moment, you should try using Audacity. Also, a name change isn't really necessary as it's a file and not an article. Jujutacular (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Deal with the Devil (Pop Evil song)
Why was Deal with the Devil (2013 Pop Evil song) moved to Deal with the Devil (Pop Evil song) instead of Deal with the Devil (song). Is there another notable song named "Deal with the Devil"? --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:56, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
 * It is used to differentiate between other artists with the same song title listed at Deal with the Devil (disambiguation), not necessarily that have an article already. The Lizzy Borden song could likely have an article written about it. I did this based on Article titles, also the request was made by User:In ictu oculi. Jujutacular (talk) 23:55, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, thanks, this was in response to my earlier bodge, which User Jax correctly picked up. Thank you both. The article is now at the right place. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:57, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
JMHamo (talk) 01:16, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Appy Pie Inc Deletion
This article "Appy Pie Inc" was a brand new article that I created and I understand that my previous article "Appy Pie" was using press releases as sources and using some promotional terms but this was corrected in my latest article "Appy Pie Inc" as all the references that I used are notable sources also, If you refer to the below link http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=Q0FQLzIwMTMvMTIvMDIjQXIwMjUwMg then you will see Worlds largest selling english daily The Times of India covered Abhinav Girdhar's wedding and categorically mentions the fact that he is Founder of Appy Pie Inc, which I think is a very notable source, this along with other sources that I have previously added will make this article as a permanent fixture, Please advise me on next steps to un-delete this article. • Cxs107 (talk) 17:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi there! As you know, the article was previously deleted via discussion, and confirmed at deletion review. I would suggest developing the article as a draft at Articles for Creation. Jujutacular (talk) 18:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I have already done that please see the sources of this page "12 in total" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Appy_Pie all the sources are highly reputable and there is no reason I can think of this page to be deleted, also I want the article Name as Appy Pie Inc and not just Appy Pie, how should I go about this? • Cxs107 (talk) 19:20, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I have moved your draft to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Appy Pie Inc, per your request. The AFC queue is somewhat backlogged, so it will be some time before it is reviewed. Jujutacular (talk) 23:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Many Thanks • Cxs107 (talk) 00:49, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Jim Lawrence (ice hockey)
I do not know why I missed this earlier, but I have just come across this AfD concerning Jim Lawrence (ice hockey). I fail to understand how you came to your conclusion that there was a consensus to delete when ivotes were split 4-5 on whether to keep or delete. As required by WP:NSPORTS, the article did provide reliable sources showing that the subject met the sport specific criteria of WP:NHOCKEY, and all four of the “keep” votes argued that the subject did, indeed, meet the sport specific criteria.

Per WP:DELAFD, the deletion of a page based on a deletion discussion should only be done when there is consensus to do so. Therefore, since it can not be reasonably concluded that there was a consensus for deletion, the page should properly be kept. I ask you to review your closing of this AfD, and to restore the article given there was no consensus for deletion. Dolovis (talk) 22:27, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 * As you seem to know, AFD operates on the basis of consensus, not just vote counting. My reading of the discussion is that those in favor of keeping did not adequately show that the subject meets WP:NHOCKEY. That is, why the Eredivisie is a "top professional league". Even disregarding this, no arguments were made that the subject is the topic of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, which is the basis for all of our notability guidelines. You are of course welcome to open a deletion review. Jujutacular (talk) 00:11, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 15:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Thau protests
In regards to BRD kindly move it back to the original pending a move discussion as that is the proper avenue. Maybe its dissolved but election is called, so no ambiguity in crisis there .(Lihaas (talk) 10:02, 10 December 2013 (UTC)).
 * Done! Cheers. Jujutacular (talk) 22:18, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Brickbat Revue
There was no debate. The page was marked for deletion. There was zero activity. There was written support. Then a very random deletion at the very end the day it was deleted. Almost as if people were waiting for the person who made the page to forget about it.

That does not seem very sportsmanlike to me.

If the decision was to delete until Brickbat Revue got off line support of it being archived in places of note then some time should have been given or that should have been said initially.

There was an entire month to make those comments and no one made any. It is almost as if they "debate" was fake and the decision was already made. That's fine, but why call it a debate if there didn't really seem to be any chance of it being a winnable debate if the person doesn't have online archival evidence.

I feel the page should be put back online with a set time for proof to be provided of its legitimacy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1635schl (talk • contribs) 20:34, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello there! My reading of the discussion at Articles for deletion/Brickbat Revue was that there were no policy-based arguments made in favor of keeping the article. Please take a look at the guideline at Notability. Specifically, a topic is considered notable if it has "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Each comment on the AFD page in favor of keeping the article had a reply that cited this guideline, but no response was ever made. The AFD was open for about 20 days, a standard AFD is only open for 7 days, so I believe that there was plenty of time to reach consensus. I don't see any reason to think that any of the editors had ulterior motives regarding the discussion. In fact, the other editors seem quite open to being convinced that the topic is notable if evidence is presented, as am I. Jujutacular (talk) 23:57, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

POTD notification


Hi Jujutacular,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Humble Tower.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 14, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2014-01-14. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:08, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Looks great! Thank you. Jujutacular (talk) 20:39, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

The Suspect (2013 Film)
Dear Administrator Juju

Please advise if I could recover the deleted page as "The Suspect (2013 Film)" now, or any suggestion to have it being created again? The movie was released on December 24, 2013 in Korea and January 10, 2014 in USA. Please. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/10/movies/gong-yoo-stars-in-the-suspect.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&_r=0 c
 * I have restored the article, it looks like there is indeed significant coverage available now. Thank you for following up with me :) Happy editing. Jujutacular (talk) 19:20, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism cleanup
Thanks for the deletions so far. Any chance you might finish the job? Andy Dingley (talk) 00:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I think I got the rest, let me know if you see anything else. Jujutacular (talk) 00:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Sorry to be a bit short, but that hoax appears to have been deleted, with an unprotected page and unblocked user, then reappeared twice already. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:12, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for changing the block settings. I was just about to ask you to do that. Widr (talk) 00:16, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeed. I just wanted to get the block out because it was clearly necessary. I then went back and saw that the account was only vandalism. Cheers. Jujutacular (talk) 00:20, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of John C. Beale
Hello! Your submission of John C. Beale at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! (Clarification: I just think it'd be good to have the hook fact be more explicitly cited in the article—no big thing.) — AJDS talk 16:42, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually, I found his middle name here. StAnselm (talk) 21:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Jujutacular (talk) 18:13, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

DYK for John C. Beale
The DYK project (nominate) 00:01, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Bolschewismus ohne Maske.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bolschewismus ohne Maske.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Unblock request
Amediausa is requesting an unblock for a change of username. Okay if I unblock? All the best,  Mini  apolis  23:08, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay, yes I would be OK with unblocking to allow a change of username. I see they've agreed to follow WP:COI, etc. Cheers. Jujutacular (talk) 19:50, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
 * No apology needed; RL is :-). Thanks and all the best,  Mini  apolis  20:09, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

I'd like your opinion
...before I take THIS live. Thanks,  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 12:48, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Well, it's live: How to be a Redhead.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 19:11, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Hey there MQS! It's looking pretty good to me, I read through and did very minor copyedit. Jujutacular (talk) 04:09, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year

 * Thanks MQS! Happy New Year to you too! Jujutacular (talk) 00:01, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Weston St Johns F.C.
Hi there, a long time ago (13 April 2011) you deleted Weston St Johns F.C. after it was PRODded and the PROD expired. Having just noticed it, I am pretty sure this football club is notable. While it never participated in the FA Cup, it did participate within the top ten levels of the English football league system – this criterion is applied by the football WikiProject to determine club notability. I don't know if it's too long ago to restore it, or what kind of state the article was in, but is there any chance of restoring it so I can improve it and establish notability? Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 16:18, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Hey there! Sorry for the delay in replying. The original article was pretty sparse, and what it did contain was entirely unsourced. So if you do have good information (and enough to establish notability), I would suggest going ahead and creating the article. Jujutacular (talk) 04:04, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem :) Ah right, fair enough, I wondered if there might be any useful links or info there. I'll try to put something together and see how it looks. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 14:10, 31 January 2015 (UTC)