User talk:Jujutacular/Archive 6

DYK for Seaweed farming
Materialscientist (talk) 08:02, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

List of Phi Kappa Psi brothers FLC
Hello, Featured list candidates/List of Phi Kappa Psi brothers/archive1 was listed 20 days ago, and is now also listed as one of the "nominations urgently needing reviews." So far four reviewers have weighed in. All objections have been met. There are two votes of support, and none opposed. As per The Rambling Man, "typically, although not prescriptively, Dabomb or I will look for around four votes of support." He also suggested that I contact "regular reviewers" such as yourself to see if you would be willing to comment. I'm happy to address constructive criticism. Hopefully upon resolving critiques, if you believe that the list is worthy, you will also grant support. Thanks, NYCRuss   ☎  17:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll take a look at it.  Jujutacular  T · C 17:03, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! NYCRuss   ☎  18:16, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Seaweed farming
Thank you for writing the article on seaweed farming. It certainly enhanced the picture's EV.  Mae din\ talk 18:12, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * My pleasure :) I was a bit surprised there wasn't one already.  Jujutacular  T · C 21:40, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I wonder if you would consider adding a few words to The Bushranger's talk page regarding the WP:SNOW closure of his nomination? Makeemlighter has before left a message letting new contributors know about these kinds of closures, just as a courtesy.  There's a sort of template you can nick from Makeemlighter here: .  Just a thought!  Good luck with your exams, :)   Mae din\ talk 07:04, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Great idea, just did it. Thanks for the note :) Perhaps we should write something about doing that into the closing procedure. I'll bring it up after exams! /Returns to studying...  Jujutacular  T · C 07:21, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Garden of Earthly Delights
Hi, I wonder why your slight crop doubled the image size? Regards Hekerui (talk) 20:20, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Ugh, I botched that didn't I. Unfortunately I'm not able to fix it right now - I've reverted back. Feel free to fix it if you'd like.  Jujutacular  T · C 20:29, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

WP:GO
Please note that the instructions for archiving the page weekly are written into the page; please do not add additions to the next week unless you archive the page. Thanks! Sandy Georgia (Talk) 11:02, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I only recently started closing featuring picture nominations, and so didn't realize what now seems blatantly obvious... :) Thanks for the note, I'll make sure to archive in the future.  Jujutacular  T · C 13:04, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Not to worry-- no one else helps, so I occasionally let my thoughts be known :) Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 13:12, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

List of Washington & Jefferson College buildings
I'd love to hear your thoughts at Peer review/List of Washington & Jefferson College buildings/archive1.--GrapedApe (talk) 05:24, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Great timing! I just finished some other work, so I'll take a look.  Jujutacular  T · C 05:25, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the feedback! I've nominated the article for FLC: Featured list candidates/List of Washington & Jefferson College buildings/archive1. I'd appreciate your feedback there, too--GrapedApe (talk) 06:18, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Looking great! Good work. I have commented at the nomination.  Jujutacular  T · C 07:23, 25 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I made some changes to this article since you supported it. here.  Just wanted you to have a chance to voice your opinion on any of the changes. Cheers!--GrapedApe (talk) 21:45, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note! All the changes look good to me.  Jujutacular  T · C 07:12, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Sound promotion
Thanks for that! Staxringold talkcontribs 18:53, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem at all :)  Jujutacular  T · C 19:37, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Account Creation Interface
I have requested an account on the ACC account creation interface.  Jujutacular  T · C 19:50, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request so welcome to the team. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide thoroughly to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on IRC where a bot informs us when new account requests come in and to get any advice on requests as well as the mailing list. Please note that we have implemented a policy of zero tolerance on mishandled requests, and that failure to assess correctly will result in suspension.


 * Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day (a day being from 0:00 UTC to 23:59 UTC), although you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked "Account Creator Needed". However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at WP:PERM.


 * Please keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse will result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome! ---- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 19:53, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks!  Jujutacular  T · C 19:57, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Turku Castle
Hi, The nomination you closed should not have been promoted. It had only 3.5 supports. --Muhammad (talk) 10:12, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Undone, thanks for the note.  Jujutacular  T · C 17:33, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Danmono
I've reviewed the Danmono submission at T:TDYK, but I'm uncertain about the sourcing. Could you respond to my concerns? Nyttend (talk) 12:50, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Responded there.  Jujutacular  T · C 17:34, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the work! I've approved everything.  I simply misunderstood your method of citation; I thought that the sources in question were used for everything from "The titles of the pieces" to '"Aki kaze no kyoku" (秋風の曲?)' in this version of the page.  Now I understand why you had information in this segment of the page that I couldn't find on any of those pages...Nyttend (talk) 17:37, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you!  Jujutacular  T · C 17:41, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a liar
I see you removed the " " from the museum article in Paris. I request that you put it back.

The museum is being stingy with the details. The truth is that they are closed because of the theft. Technical reasons is an excuse and a vague explanation. That would be like saying the President of Nigeria, His Excellency Mr. Yar'Adua, will not be attending the dinner due to medical reasons. Yes, medical reasons, he's dead.

So you wrote "removed quotes around "technical reasons". As it is, makes it look like we are questioning the validity of the closure". Yes, we are. To be the most neutral we can write that the "museum is closed citing 'technical reasons' ". Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 21:09, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Perfect alternative, thank you. I have made the change.  Jujutacular  T · C 21:17, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Featured_picture_candidates
I replied to your question at the discussion linked above. And no worries about Turku Castle, I'm sure everyone appreciates your help with running FPC.

Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 14:55, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note!  Jujutacular  T · C 05:57, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Danmono
The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Gary Sinise on stage
Am I suppose to notify the closing admin on an unsuccessful FPC of a VPC nomination.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:03, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Not that I know of, but thanks.  Jujutacular  T · C 06:19, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Replied to FPC review thread
Regards, Papa Lima Whiskey  (talk) 17:41, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Doug Turner
Your closing statement says "No arguments to delete besides nominator". Technically true, but I argued for a redirection which is, in essence, a "delete". --Mkativerata (talk) 05:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Since it is Articles for Deletion, I would say that any vote besides delete constitutes keeping the article (whether it acts as a redirect or not) since it doesn't involve the technical act of deleting the article. Discussion about whether to merge/redirect/etc can continue on the article's talk page.  Jujutacular  T · C 05:51, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * "Redirect" is an extremely common outcome of AfD debates, especially for political candidates where the relevant guideline says "redirect as a general rule". Redirecting is the same as deleting: the whole content of the article goes. It's just replaced by a redirect instead of a redlink. Often when debates are closed as "redirect" the article gets deleted and replaced with a redirect. AfD debates are to be judged on substance, not whether people put a bold "keep" or "delete" in front of their !votes. Clearly the substance of my !vote was to delete the article and replace it with a search aid. I've never seen an administrator close a debate in this way.--Mkativerata (talk) 05:57, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I've seen it quite a bit, but very well. Undone.  Jujutacular  T · C 06:02, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much for your consideration. --Mkativerata (talk) 06:03, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for making your case courteously :) Happy editing.  Jujutacular  T · C 06:06, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 May newsletter
We are half way through round 3, with a little under a month to go. The current overall leader is, who has 570 points. He leads pool C. Pools A, B and D are led by, and  respectively. Anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Two of last year's final 8, and, have dropped out of the competition, saying they would rather their place went to someone who will have more time on their hands than them next round. On a related note, a special thank you goes to for his help behind the scenes once again. There is currently a problem with the poster, perhaps caused by the new skin- take a look at this discussion and see if you can help. The competition has continued to tick over well with minimal need for judge intervention, so thank you to everyone making that possible. Good luck to all! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 20:50, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Non-admin closure
Articles_for_deletion/Aboobacker_Ahmad. See examples to avoid NAC.  Enigma msg  13:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm going to assume you're referrring to it being non-unanimous. However, the only delete !vote besides the nominator was an indefinitely blocked sockpuppet, and used the argument "just not notable". I consider that close non-controversial. If you still believe that the closure was inappropriate, feel free to undo it and relist the discussion. Thanks.  Jujutacular  T · C 00:23, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, I didn't realize that. You're right. Sorry,  Enigma msg  05:37, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem at all. Thank you for pointing out the perceived error. One of the worst things I see around enwiki is people letting bad behaviors go out of fear of controversy. We should all be ready to discuss calmly our actions and the actions of others. Happy editing!  Jujutacular  T · C 11:30, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

1918 Navy Enlistment Poster
No problem, thanks. Nautica Shad es  00:48, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Review of closure process 2 results
Hi, because you contributed to FPC's recent review, I'm letting you know that the results of the poll have been posted. We appreciate your contributions to the first stage and hope you take part in this next step, here, to move towards implementing several changes to the process. Regards,  Mae din\ talk 18:38, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I have begun discussing... :)  Jujutacular  T · C 21:19, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for adding the Bare URL template to Deaths in 2010. I did not know such a template existed! It should keep many of the ongoing comments in check. Best wishes, WWGB (talk) 08:31, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually I created it just a bit ago! Figured it would help others not waste as much time as I did :)  Jujutacular  T · C 08:35, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!
Jujutacular - Thank for your participation and support in my RfA.

I can honestly say that your comments and your trust in me are greatly appreciated.

Please let me know if you ever have any suggestions for me as an editor, or comments based on my admin actions.

Thank you! 7 23:32, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

FLC review urgent
Hi! Since you are familiar with reviewing Lists of National Treasures of Japan, I thought you could help out with the following... List of National Treasures of Japan (archaeological materials) is presently a featured list candidate and marked as Nominations urgently needing reviews which means that it is in danger of failing the nomination due to a lack of reviews. I'd be happy, if you could have a look at the list and leave comments, questions or suggestions at the nomination page. The criteria to be checked against are found here. Thanks. bamse (talk) 14:24, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll take a look at it today.  Jujutacular  T · C 15:07, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Much appreciated. bamse (talk) 15:23, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Sul Ross statue
My opinion is only my own, and in any case there's nothing wrong with including the picture in the article. But I'd predict that the following objections would be raised against the argument that the photo has EV for the subject of the statue: - Only a small minority of the area of the photograph is devoted to the statue at all. - A statue, while it has artistic merit, is not the most encyclopedic way of depicting what someone looks like. A photograph, or barring that a portrait, is generally better. The only featured picture of a statue that comes to my mind is this one (nommed by me, although I didn't take the photo), where the EV mostly comes from depicting a detail of the Brandenberg Gate. If there were an article about this statue, then this photo could have good EV. Another thing-- are you sure that the statue itself is not covered by copyright? Can't always take that for granted: Spikebrennan (talk) 02:46, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Replied at talk page.  Jujutacular  T · C 03:18, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Whither Illinois?
Sources I just figured that I'd let you know that http://allgoodnaysayers.net/ might shut down soon. Between wget now and Internet Archive later, you could probably get any info you want, and you might be done editing the article on Illinois, but if you're still interested in working on this one, it's worth checking out their sources now. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:39, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Addendum Please respond on my talk if you have anything to say. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:39, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Ernest Hemingway image replacement
It seems that you neglected to replace the image in the Hemingway bio. Am I mistaken?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:49, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
 * It had already been replaced: .  Jujutacular  T · C 13:51, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Houston skyline
Hi! In regards to the pic, try sending a message at User talk:Djarizpe13 - He may not respond there, but the photo credits are to "Daniel Arizpe" so if you find an e-mail address it would be helpful to contact him.

In regards to the possible location, Sabine Park's view is here - It seems likely that this was taken around the park, as the Continental Center I is to the far right both in the Google Maps view and in the Arizpe pic. WhisperToMe (talk) 03:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Lady Windermere's Fan: Thanks
Thanks for doing the stuff to get the production on the featured sounds section. FergusRossFerrier (talk) 00:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem at all, thank you for producing such a wonderful play and releasing it under a free license.  Jujutacular  T · C 02:52, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Presidents of Washington & Jefferson College/archive1
I nominated a list for FLC: Featured list candidates/List of Presidents of Washington & Jefferson College/archive1, if you care to review it. Thanks!--GrapedApe (talk) 17:58, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll take a look.  Jujutacular  T · C 18:11, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

WPA FPC nom
I see you found a WPA FPC nominee from the 1930s. I am wondering if you know how to find any Grant Park Concerts posters by the WPA from the 1930s.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:09, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Found that poster in the WPA collection of the Library of Congress. Searching for the concert:  unfortunately didn't return any results. "Grant Park" gets some hits:, but none seemingly related to the concerts. Sorry, tough luck. If you do ever get your hands on some originals I'd love to do a restoration.  Jujutacular  T · C 15:39, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * By the way, I was thinking of doing a restoration for a "Century of Progress" exposition poster next - which I believe are in the public domain because they were printed without a copyright notice (before 1978). Which one would you prefer?, , ? (I can get them all in high resolution if you want to decide then).  Jujutacular  T · C 15:45, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I can not actually see them in the thumb version to make a choice. Are you able to teach about restoration of such files?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:50, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I could - you are using GIMP, correct? I tried it once with GIMP and honestly found it much more difficult honestly (I usually use Photoshop). However, those posters look to be pretty good condition so maybe it wouldn't be too bad.  Jujutacular  T · C 15:53, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Durova's blog: is a great resource for learning restoration techniques. The "cauldron" on the left margin has a list of subjects covered.  Jujutacular  T · C 16:13, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I use GIMP, hugin, and paint to do my photo editing. I also have Corel Paint Shop Pro, but have never used it as well as all the utilities that come with Canon cameras.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:18, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * GIMP is probably your best bet then. LoC website seems to be down right now, but I'll get those in full resolution sometime tonight and let you know.  Jujutacular  T · C 16:33, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * O.K. suppose I read something like this. I still don't know how to fix a blown sky.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:43, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * A blown sky? Not sure what you mean.  Jujutacular  T · C 20:45, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Scratch those Century of Progress posters - they are printed with copyright notice... sad day.  Jujutacular  T · C 21:16, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Sorry. Was trying to fix something, but seem to have buggered it up in a new way in the process. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:35, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * But I started it...sorry!!  Mae din\ talk 17:56, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem - looks to be all taken care of now :)  Jujutacular  T · C 17:58, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Mike Godwin
I'm sorry, but that's just ridiculous. Even if that's the rules as written (which, officially, it isn't- "For promotion, if an image is listed here for about seven days with four or more reviewers in support (excluding the nominator(s)) and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list."- it clearly had that) this should have been closed as a promote. J Milburn (talk) 11:48, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * A minimum of 5 full supports has been the standard of practice for a while (1 2 3). Bring it up on WT:FPC if you still disagree - I would welcome the scrutiny. I've been wrong before :)  Jujutacular  T · C 14:11, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, raised there. J Milburn (talk) 16:23, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: Grammy Award for Best Female Rock Vocal Performance
Since you commented on and supported the promotion of Grammy Award for Best Male Rock Vocal Performance, I thought you might also like to comment on a similar list for Best Female Rock Vocal Performance. If you are not interested, no problem! Thanks! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:11, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yea, I'll take a look at it.  Jujutacular  T · C 21:15, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I hope I have addressed your concerns. (And while I confused myself when trying to provide an explanation for the wikilinks, I hope you now understand). -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:23, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

I wanted to let you know that I went ahead and nominated the list Grammy Award for Best Metal Performance for FL status. If you are interested, feel free to take a look at the list and offer any comments or concerns that you feel need to be addressed. Best wishes! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:44, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I'll probably review it this weekend sometime.  Jujutacular  T · C 16:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:W.E.F. Britten - Alfred, Lord Tennyson - Lady of Shalott.jpg
I removed the smudge you annotated at Commons. Feel free to remove the annotation if you're satisfied, as it's probably not very useful now. Cheers. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 17:43, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks good, thanks.  Jujutacular  T · C 17:56, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Meta 4
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 12:02, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 June newsletter
We're half way through 2010, and the end of the WikiCup is in sight! Round 3 is over, and we're down to our final 16. Our pool winners were (A),  (B, and the round's overall leader),  (C)  and  (D, joint), but, with the scores reset, everything is to play for in our last pooled round. The pools will be up before midnight tonight, and have been selected randomly by J Milburn. This will be the toughest round yet, and so, as ever, anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Though unaffiliated with the WikiCup, July sees the third Great Wikipedia Dramaout- a project with not dissimilar goals to the WikiCup. Everyone is welcome to take part and do their bit to contribute to the encyclopedia itself.

If you're interested in the scores for the last round of the Cup, please take a look at WikiCup/History/2010/Round 3 and WikiCup/History/2010/Full/Round 3. Our thanks go to for compiling these. As was predicted, Group C ended up the "Group of Death", with 670 points required for second place, and, therefore, automatic promotion. This round will probably be even tougher- again, the top two from each of the two groups will make it through, while the twelve remaining participants will compete for four wildcard places- good luck everyone! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17