User talk:Juke Adams

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Juke Adams, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Existence of God does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! VandTrack (talk) 05:20, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

About your POV pushing
I'm very sorry that you consider Neutral Point of View irrational. But as stated in the notice above, Neutral Point of View is one of Wikipedia's core policies. So, even if you think it is irrational, at Wikipedia we have to maintain a neutral point of view when writing articles. Unfortunately, your edits constitute a pushing of your point of view, which also violates Wikipedia's policy about original research. I will not discuss the irrationality or rationality of the policies of Wikipedia, so I will limit myself to revert what possible blatant POV pushing you may commit. Thank you --VandTrack (talk) 05:28, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, I will not discuss any further. You have clearly stated in my talk page that you are here to "break the rules". So there is no point to discuss with a blatant vandal. Thanks --VandTrack (talk) 05:34, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * If you want to dialogue, you need to start by reading and understanding the three core policies of Wikipedia, which are: Neutral Point of View, Verifiability and No Original Research. All wikipedians should follow those three rules. You have explicitly showed your disregard for at least one of them, and have expressed your intention to breach other rules. Breaching of these policies constitute Vandalism in Wikipedia. --VandTrack (talk) 05:45, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Afterlife appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. VandTrack (talk) 05:22, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Religious fanaticism. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. This user has expressed his intentions to keep breaching wikipedia rules VandTrack (talk) 05:36, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Existence of God, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. :| TelCo NaSp  Ve :|  05:39, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It’s simple. If you think God doesn’t exist, why do you care? You don’t realize what happens when you call fellow atheists fools, do you? :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  05:47, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * First, read the policy on WP:TRUTH. There’s nothing about Wikipedia that’s true. Second, if you decide to continue in your disruptive manner, I'll tell you that you need to read the policy on WP:BLOCK. :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  05:50, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Netalarm talk 05:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

I have replied to you on my talk page. Netalarm talk 05:58, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing and personal attacks, as well as POV pushing and many other attributes of editing which indicate that you are not here to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 06:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)