User talk:Jukeboksi

Juxo, please add some matter to consumerium. Thanks

Juxo, I did not made that page, I am sure you know that; I merely saved it from ostracism.

The reason why I did so, I explained on the mailing list.

In extract, this is what I wrote

-

I think both consumerium and disinfopedia are very important to be mentionned in meta. Why not limit ourselves to the encyclopedia space ? Easy. These two projects have a pecularity that goes beyond what is encyclopedic. And this pecularity does not belong to the encyclopedic article. They are both a justification and a "faire valoir" (my, what is the english word for this ?) I mean : 1) they strongly rely on the existence of the encyclopedia, since they use it widely as a reference. Without Wikipedia, it is likely these projects would not be viable really. Or much tougher to build. They do not need to include everything themselves, they can use us as a source, and may focus on what is important to them => disinformation and consumerism. They are specialists sources. They directly benefit from Wikipedia growth. 2) at the same time, they augment the quality, the interest, the traffic and the growth of Wikipedia. They directly link to us (not pick up the information to use it freely) hence bringing us new readers and new contributors. As specialists projects, they increase the value of our work. They refer to us. Wikipedia directly benefits from their existence as well. In ecology, that is called a symbiosis :-) I do not have the proper words to explain this perhaps, but this is important. It is important to increase the visibility of such projects. And I cannot figure putting this in the encyclopedia article itself. Now, if I put this, without even an introduction explaining what the project is, or without the external link to the projects (which is the currently banned content), it is just bullshit.

--

Now, I am glad you improved it in a meaningful way. You are probably more useful than I am :-) You gave it the right to exist again :-)

It wasn't really a translation :) I've written an article in Dutch for Indymedia, about Wikipedia. And I also mentioned related projects. After I published it I found the part about Consumerium quite usable for the 'pedia. :) Guaka 20:54, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Pipe Dream
Do you have references for your theory of what a pipe dream is? According to Merriam-Webster, the etymology is much simpler -- "from the fantasies brought about by the smoking of opium"

Thank you - I was just curious, as I was only familiar with the opium based etymology. LarryMac 19:28, 22 August 2005 (UTC) (sorry about not signing my post before, I'm still getting the hang of this)

Consumerium
No hard feelings, I hope :-) At least it notified you that the site was unavailable. Mr. Jones 16:47, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

Consumerium, ideas.
Juxo I need to contact you asap about your project consumerium. I have some ideas and a proposition for you. I have been meaning to create a similar site with the same basis but which would very likely have a much bigger impact on consumerism for reasons I need to explain.

All I ask is that you allow me to email you the ideas. I can greatly benefit from your experience and, for your peace of mind I assure you the idea doesn't violate the GNUFDL.

Just noticed that your article about your wiki has been deleted.
Your article has been deleted on the basis of three votes, and a very low Alexa rating for the site. How many users does it have, BTW? I guess you'll have to move the content to meta. If you ask an admin nicely, they may retrieve the latest version for you. Mr. Jones 19:05, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Paleface (Finnish rap artist)
A tag has been placed on Paleface (Finnish rap artist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Xtzou ( Talk ) 16:40, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Monosodium glutamate, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ''Um... yeah. I'd say "uncited material" except for the fact you were bragging on IRC...'' --ANowlin: talk 02:25, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Defocusation
A tag has been placed on Defocusation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bejinhan  talks   12:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Reverse financial instrument
Do not recreate articles that have been through a valid Articles for deletion, Articles for deletion/Reverse financial instrument, take it to Deletion review. Recreating may lead to your blocking. Also looking at some of your comments I suggest that you read Civility. Thanks. Enter CBW, waits for audience applause, not a sausage. 16:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Powder bathing


The article Powder bathing has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable neologism

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 16:24, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Blocked: Disruptive editing
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for disruptive editing; creating hoax/original research articles despite warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 13:38, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Paleface (Finnish rapper)


The article Paleface (Finnish rapper) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. WWGB (talk) 12:29, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Reverse trading for deletion
The article Reverse trading is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Reverse trading until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 09:08, 20 January 2011 (UTC)


 * You can add the part about finance industry participation in shorting securities they promote to Fraud. 99.39.5.103 (talk) 13:19, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:10, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of National Environmental Directory for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Environmental Directory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/National Environmental Directory until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 20:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of National Environmental Directory for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Environmental Directory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/National Environmental Directory & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 17:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Arvid brandberg
Hello jubo-jubo, could you please translate this into English? You're the only person I know who can speak it...—Eat me, I'm an azuki (talk · contribs · email) 13:13, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of GoMore


A tag has been placed on GoMore, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bazj (talk) 20:37, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Peer-to-peer ridesharing


A tag has been placed on Peer-to-peer ridesharing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ubiquity (talk) 16:07, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of GEPIR


A tag has been placed on GEPIR requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Toddst1 (talk) 20:51, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Cristina Sánchez (molecular biologist)
Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. Jukeboksi, thanks for creating Cristina Sánchez (molecular biologist)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. PLease read WP:NACADEMIC for guidelines on what makes an academic notable enough to be retained on Wikipedia. At present, I am struggling to see how Sanchez meets those criteria. I shall return in a few weeks and check if ou've been able to help on that score.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Nick Moyes (talk) 00:11, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * As someone who works with these subjects, I can say there's certainly questions about Notability and what would only help is if there are significant publications establishing her as a significant figure in the field. Also note that notability cannot be inherited. I'm absolutely available to answer any questions, SwisterTwister   talk  00:15, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Help a new Editor
The Maven Car Sharing Wikipedia article looks out of date. Can you help me update it?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maven_(car_sharing) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DietDrPepper123 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Category:Carpooling services has been nominated for discussion
Category:Carpooling services, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 17:01, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ruthenium-Iridium nanosized coral
Hello, Jukeboksi,

Thank you for creating Ruthenium-Iridium nanosized coral.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"An encyclopedia article should be about the object/ substance that is the topic, not promote the discoverers and their employers. Where published and who should be in the references."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:24, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Powerpaste for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Powerpaste is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Powerpaste until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Chidgk1 (talk) 07:24, 5 March 2024 (UTC)