User talk:Jul234/sandbox

Evaluate a source
Did you accidentally submit a request to create a new WP article? You're not in trouble, but don't do that again. Perhaps the problem was that the hyperlink you placed in your sandbox don't actually link to the existing article. You should fix that.

"Human enhancement" would be a good article to work on. Contrary to what you say, it has lots of sources and isn't that short. It is, however, poorly written. There are lists that should be replaced or supplemented with text written in clear, coherent sentences. The lead contains a long quotation and should be completely rewritten. There's a lot to work on here.

"Cyborg data mining" is also promising. Revising the language would definitely be beneficial. Also, providing relevant hyperlinks to it from other related article would be an interesting challenge.

I wouldn't recommend working on "Super-humanism." It's most likely (and justifiably) going to be merged with "Superhuman".

Go ahead and pick the article you want to work on.Josef Horáček (talk) 20:30, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Ethics of human enhancement
It looks like you found a good source and started adding content from it. Please take care to summarize the source using your own language. You don't want to plagiarize the source, and you want to keep quotations to a minimum. Josef Horáček (talk) 17:29, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Some good edits so far to improve the neutral point of view. Also, your source is great. Be sure to format the citation properly. Is there any relevant information in the source you could also add to the article? Josef Horáček (talk) 19:16, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has notified me that you may have committed plagiarism. Did you post some text directly from your source into the WP article? As I have said in my comment on April 6 (see above), you must summarize the information using your own language. Josef Horáček (talk) 17:28, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Final Assessment
I hope your experience with Wikipedia has been useful. Thank you for persevering and for engaging with the Wikipedia community in a productive and respectful way. Hopefully you ended up with a deeper understanding of what is and isn't allowed on Wikipedia. Josef Horáček (talk) 20:11, 6 May 2019 (UTC)