User talk:Julemyer

Welcome!
Hello, Julemyer, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:46, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username): Julemyer Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Julemyer/sandbox Lead

Guiding questions:

I Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?: The Lead has been updated to reflect the new content. Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?: The lead includes an introductory sentence that describes the article's topic clearly. Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?: The Lead includes a brief description of the article's major sections but she should work on adding more. Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? The lead has information and outlined what she will add later on into the article. Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?: The Lead is concise.

Lead evaluation Content

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic?: The content added is relevant to the topic. Is the content added up-to-date?: The group debuted in 2018 and the content starts there. I know you just started and you are going to add more. Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?: The content you wrote belongs there and I would not consider that it is missing because you are working on adding more. Content evaluation Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral?: Yes, the content added is neutral. Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?: All the information you added does not appear heavily bias towards a particular position. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?: As of now, there aren't viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented. Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?: The content added is general and it doesn't attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another. Tone and balance evaluation Sources and References

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?: The new content is backed up by a reliable secondary source. Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?: Yes the source you have is thorough. Are the sources current?: Yes the source is current. The article was written in 2018 and they debuted in 2018. Check a few links. Do they work?: Yes the link works and it opened to the article perfectly. Sources and references evaluation Organization

Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?: The content is clear and very easy to read. Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?: The content does not have any grammatical or spelling errors. Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?: The content is a rough outline but you have sections. Organization evaluation Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media (You do not have a picture so I will skip this section)

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?: Are images well-captioned? Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? Images and media evaluation For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?: Right now you have 1 source but I know you will add more. How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?: Yes the article follows the pattern of other similar articles. Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?: The article does not link to other articles. New Article Evaluation Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?: Since you are starting a complete new page, the overall quality is great. What are the strengths of the content added?: I think the content added is a strength because before you did this, they did not have a page. How can the content added be improved?: We just started but adding more information would improve it. Overall evaluation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lianayui1030 (talk • contribs) 17:42, 6 March 2020 (UTC)