User talk:Julia.j@sympatico.ca

Hello, Julia, please take the time to read WP:NOT. Yanksox (talk) 16:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Hello Yanksox: I have read WP:NOT and i dispute the allegation that the entry in any way meets any of the NOTs that are listed. If it does, then so too do many other entries including the entry for Mego Corporation. And i woudl respectfully request that you only delete Mego Inc's entry if you delete the Mego Corporation entry as well. Mego Inc has suffered from confusion with Mego Corporation SPECIFICALLY because of WIKIPEDIA. therefore, in order for Wikipedia to be anything other than a source of confusion, you must delete both or leave both. Not one or the other. Thanks.

Please also take the time to read WP:INN, it applys in this case. Yanksox (talk) 16:20, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Dear Yanksox: I have read WP:INN. It is, at the end of the day, up to you regarding whether the non inclusion of mego inc renders the utility of wikipedia better. I think that it does not. And i further think that when Mego launches in the next three months (with significant pre launch buzz) the fact that mego inc's entry was "speedily deleted" will not be a positive reflection on the overall utility of wikipedia.

So what do you suggest? I presume that your goal / interest is in ensuring that Wikipedia continues to operate as an importand source of general knowledge. Given that mego is a patent pending utility that other companies (the names of which i cannot dislcose but all of whom have large entries on wikipedia) are currently trying to buy, i would have a hard time believing that you coudl unilaterally decide (1) that it is an unimportant company and (2) that you should not delete mego corporation at the very least if you choose not to delete mego inc. Your users are being mislead.

Mego Inc.
As it stands today, Mego Inc. is not notable, and it doesn't help that you, a co-founder, wrote the article. Wait for this much-hyped launch and then we'll see. Andre (talk) 16:46, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

AfD Nomination Mego Inc
I've nominated the article Mego Inc for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Mego Inc satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Mego Inc. Don't forget to add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Mego Inc during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. -- Vary | Talk 16:52, 17 June 2006 (UTC)