User talk:Julia985

November 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Josh Franceschi, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Josh Franceschi was changed by Julia985 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951675 on 2011-11-27T18:20:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:20, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Dan Flint for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dan Flint is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dan Flint until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mato (talk) 18:28, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

You Me At Six Articles
Dear Julia - I've noticed that you are creating individual articles for the members of You Me At Six. It is unlikely that the individual members of this band meet Wikipedia's Notability Guidelines to have individual articles, as they are only notable for being members of You Me At Six. The articles you have created will be discussed for deletion by members of the Wikipedia community, but to save your time and effort, I feel I should advise you that your articles will likely be simply redirected to the You Me At Six article. Feel free to contact me if you have any queries. Regards. Mato (talk) 18:36, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Dan Flint, you may be blocked from editing. MikeWazowski (talk) 23:25, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

What did you think about the deletion notice you received?
Hi Julia985,

In November you received a message about either "Nomination for deletion" or "Proposed deletion" of an article you created. I'd like to ask you a few quick questions: You can feel free to answer on my talk page or send me your response by email (mpinchuk@undefinedwikimedia.org). (I won't quote you or link your answers to your username if you don't feel comfortable with that.) Your feedback is incredibly useful for improving the content of deletion notifications, so please take a minute to think about and answer these questions. Thank you! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:10, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Was the message helpful? Were the instructions clear and easy to follow?
 * 2) If not, how do you think the message could be improved?
 * 3) What do you think about the deletion process in general? Do you understand how to contest a deletion?

I had to say something: per your edit on the Godd Crazy HIMYM episode page, Wikia is NEVER a reputable source of information for anything, any wiki on there is not worth the bandwidth to read. 150.203.222.77 (talk) 06:58, 27 April 2012 (UTC)