User talk:Julia 2017BookReview

Welcome!
Hello, Julia 2017BookReview, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Romaine (talk) 14:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * PS: The project page can be found at: Benelux Education Program/Maastricht University/FPN Historical Book Review Spring 2017. Romaine (talk) 14:20, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Feedback on your article
Hello Julia 2017BookReview, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. I especially will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay. I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article before our next meeting. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 09:37, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Intro sentence: okay
 * Links: okay
 * Headers: okay. Not needed to capitalise "Reception" as normally this word is in lower case.
 * References: There must be more sources in the article, certainly concerning this heavy topic.
 * Context/timeframe: If nothing (more) can be found about this, it is okay, but if there is more information available
 * How was the book received: good start, but I like to read more about this. "However, Ellis book about sexual inversion was not selled in Britain so it had to be published abroad." -> Why? Please explain that in the article.
 * Hello Julia 2017BookReview, Thank you for improving your article! Last week we specifically asked to make sure you add sources/references to your article, because that is one of the most important parts of a Wikipedia article. We also wanted to make sure the intro sentence/section is ready. Let's see how it is going now.
 * Intro sentence: good
 * Links: Some more links please, like "physician", "writer", and some others.
 * Headers: okay. Still not needed to capitalise "Reception" as normally this word is in lower case... The paragraph "Influence and Reception" is too long and should be split in two parts, starting at "In the scientific community...".
 * References: Sufficient for now in number, but more are welcome. A small detail: add references behind the dot and no space between the dot and the reference. Please add if possible also references in the section "Content" to where certain parts come from in the book, like the chapter or page.
 * Context/timeframe: good
 * How was the book received: good
 * Keep up the good work! Romaine (talk) 01:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello Julia 2017BookReview, I add the image of the book to your sandbox article. Romaine (talk) 05:51, 23 May 2017 (UTC)