User talk:Julia Ivanova DeGruyterOpen

Welcome!
Hello, Julia Ivanova DeGruyterOpen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle  Faddle  11:08, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: De Gruyter Open (April 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:De Gruyter Open and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:De_Gruyter_Open Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Timtrent&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:De_Gruyter_Open reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle  Faddle  11:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Julia Ivanova DeGruyterOpen! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 10:37, Monday, May 4, 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: De Gruyter Open (May 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Randykitty was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:De Gruyter Open and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:De_Gruyter_Open Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Randykitty&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:De_Gruyter_Open reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Randykitty (talk) 11:02, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Open Chemistry article
I reviewed your newly created article on the journal Open Chemistry. I didn't see any specific needs for improvement, so I did not mark the article with any tags requesting changes. Because this is an online journal, the journal itself and the related article about open access journals seem to me to be sufficient indicators of verifiability.

However, when I noticed your username, I thought I would send you a message about the article. If you are involved with the organization that is the subject of the article, there may be a conflict of interest (CoI). Please read WP:COI, the guidelines about conflicts of interest. If you should find that there is a conflict of interest, take the steps described in that article, or contact me so I can find an editor who can help you.

I didn't place a CoI message on the article because the contents were generally objective and neutral. So, I don't mean to say there is a CoI, but it's an issue I do take seriously and I feel that all reasonable precautions should be taken.

I'd like to hear from you, however you decide. If you wish to contact me, you can leave a message at my talk page, or you can reply to this message and get my attention by including "" in your reply. Thanks. Roches (talk) 11:10, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, and . This article should not have been created at all, as we already have an article on this subject: Central European Journal of Chemistry. It simply got a new name, so the correct thing to do here would have been to move the article to the new name and edit the text to reflect the new situation. I will rdctify this as soon as I have a few minutes time, because for reason of attribution, the article histories will have to be merged. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 12:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I see, sorry if it created any trouble that I reviewed it, since the new article appeared satisfactory and the old article was short. With the change in name, format and publisher it wasn't clear how much there was continuity with the old journal. But I see now that, since the journal changed its name, the old title should redirect to the new title, and renaming the article by moving it is the right thing to do. I'll keep that in mind if I ever encounter anything similar. Roches (talk) 16:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, it's not a biggie, but good to know for the future. Just look at it as for a person: if someone changes names for whatever reason (marriage, sex change - Chelsea Manning is a much-talked about example), we don't create two articles either, but just rename the existing one to the new name. --Randykitty (talk) 17:46, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Draft:De Gruyter Open concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:De Gruyter Open, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:De Gruyter Open


Hello, Julia Ivanova DeGruyterOpen. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "De Gruyter Open".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  samtar { t } 20:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)