User talk:Julia Neumann

cognitive entities
"Some remarks on an experiment suggesting quantum-like behavior of cognitive entities and formulation of an abstract quantum mechanical formalism to describe cognitive entity and its dynamics" <-- Do you have a copy of this? --JWSchmidt 05:33, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Please provide an edit summary to each of your edits. Otherwise your edits, especially deletions, will be considered vandalism and reverted. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 21:18, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jan C. A. Boeyens
I have nominated Jan C. A. Boeyens, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Jan C. A. Boeyens. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. User A1 (talk) 11:57, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Contributions
Hello, Concerning your recent edits: Inline citations are standard practice for reference works, and should be used in preference to sections such as "further reading" or "bibliography" sections. For more information please view the WP:CITE guideline. User A1 (talk) 12:01, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Memory understood as an equlibrium Bose gas
I assume your reversion in Bose–Einstein condensation: a network theory approach was to restore the memory section. There were a number of corrections made, that were lost in your reversion, so I have restored these corrections and added the memory section. PAR (talk) 14:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Julia Neumann! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Jan C. A. Boeyens -

Volkmar Weiss
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Volkmar Weiss. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  16:48, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heritability of IQ, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WISC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, corrected.--Julia Neumann (talk) 16:00, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

WP:OR and WP:SYNTH at Nations and intelligence quotient
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Generalrelative (talk) 20:13, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

WP:SPAM for Volkmar Weiss
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. You recent contribution history seems to be entirely devoted to adding references to and discussion of the work of Volkmar Weiss. Please be aware that WP:SPA editing is considered a sign of WP:NOTHERE. Generalrelative (talk) 21:21, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Volkmar Weiss for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Volkmar Weiss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Volkmar Weiss until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Generalrelative (talk) 22:57, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

November 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Intelligence quotient. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Sundayclose (talk) 14:25, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

October 2023
Hello, Julia Neumann. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to sources you may be affiliated with.

Editing in this way is a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM); the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

If you wish to continue contributing, please first consider citing other reliable secondary sources such as review articles that were written by other researchers in your field and that are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite sources for which you may have a conflict of interest, please start a new section on the article's talk page and add Edit COI to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

MrOllie (talk) 13:00, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)