User talk:Julia W/Archive 2

Returning the favor
or at least trying to. For this ;-)  So Why  14:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * C'est parfait! Merci beaucoup, monsieur!  I didn't want to ask, so I'm grateful that you saw, :-)  You got it just right.  And you can't float center?  How very silly, lol! :D  I was trying various things in a "logical" way without knowing what I was doing.  I tried columns, too, but they turned out too narrow.  Vielen dank, SoWhy, I appreciate it! Oh, and you're welcome for the little template thing, I just stalk your talk page ;)   Maedin \talk 17:35, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * In future, don't hesitate, just ask. Don't worry, I'll tell you when I am getting bored of you (I doubt I will^^).


 * You have to understand how CSS is structured. It's for structuring text around pictures, not aligning pictures. And text, in HTML, can only float around the picture on the left or the right side. I.e. if you create a  -container, you are telling the text "I am left, you float around me". "Center" would "confuse" the text because it would have to float at both ways. HTML is not planned to do that.
 * The solution I used works differently. The first container, the one on the left floats. The second one is positioned relative to it (using position: relative) and at a distance of "left: XX". You can use "position: absolute" (like I do on my userpage) to assign every container a fixed distance from the borders of the page (using the left:, right:, top: and bottom: attributes), maybe that looks better. You can try and play with it a bit. I'd suggest a reference page like this one for that. If you need any help or fail with what you want to do, feel free to tell me what you wanted to do and I will try to help you.


 * And: I don't mind stalkers, especially young, female, witty, nice ones (I'd add beautiful but I haven't seen a picture of you and I don't want to lie ;-) But I think it's probably true as well). So keep stalking :-D  So Why  19:15, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Poor text, I was confusing it :-( Thank you for such a great (and fun!) explanation.  Now I get it.  When I have more time I'll try to use top: to get the things I want in a line at the top of the page.  For some reason they are each spread out on a different line (the rollback, account creator, and dyk).  I tried to copy some code from another userpage that had them all lined up, but it still didn't work as I thought it should, so I've left it for now.  I'll examine the link you gave and see what I can do!


 * But since you said don't hesitate . . . perhaps you can help me get that barnstar away from the borders of the containers? It has

(which sounds like it should work!), and I tried adding lots of lines, but that had no effect, lol. I just don't want it touching the line. Girls are so picky, :-)


 * As to your final comments, it sounds as though you are somewhat deluded! Here is a link which will clear things up in at least one regard, :-)  I'll keep stalking you anyway, of course, I have a thing for young, male, multilingual, funny Germans.   Maedin \talk 21:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I fixed it for you, accountcreator has a "both" switch for that (you need to become an admin soon, then you need only one flag ;-) and I used a table for the arranging). Also the space between the stuff and the barnstar. If clear does not work, use - instead, like I did here. Don't worry about being picky - I do have a girlfriend so I know how you girls are ;-)


 * Deluded? Me? Just because I'm a socialist...no wait, you mean for praising you? Ah well, I ain't. And for what I can see from the pictures, I was correct about the good-looking part as well. But you got to admit that one cannot make a decision based on half a face of someone taken in the morning or after a long day. So I'll say a.) I think I was correct and b.) as far as I can tell from what little one can see on those pictures. ;-) Have a nice evening  So Why  22:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


 * PS: I did another bit of rearranging, I think I got it the way you intended it to look like now.  So Why  22:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Yay, you got them all lined up! Thank you! About the boxes though. . . maybe it's just my monitor, but it doesn't look right to me! You know how there was a large gap between the first container and the second, and a much smaller gap between the second and the third? Which was making it look uneven? Ideally, I want the gaps to be the same size, but without distorting the containers. So right now, the middle container is too long and narrow. That's what happened when I was trying to use columns. I also made the first one too small (because I didn't like the big graphics), so I've padded it out a bit (and made it transparent at the subpage).

I feel a little guilty for putting energy into it, actually. Too picky, for sure! Thank you soooo much for your help; wish I were half as clever, :-) You've been really really nice, I appreciate it!   Maedin \talk 08:49, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, I think I got it! Whoo-hoo!  :-)))))   Maedin \talk 09:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, now they are fixed on the left if one has a widescreen like I do. But that's the same for my userpage, so I wouldn't worry. Nice job with it :-)
 * And don't feel guilty, you don't want to know how much energy I put into my userpage and then Amalthea had to fix it for me. So we all need someone who is more knowledgeable than we are to fix the blunders we make. But that is why this is a wiki and why it works. I am glad I could be of assistance, I really am. Helping people (especially young, nice, good-looking girls ;-)) always makes me feel warm and fuzzy inside :-D  So Why  10:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Why thank you :)
Coming from someone I once described on IRC as 'greased lightening' on the ACC tool, that means a lot. That was a very nice and unexpected thing to find on my userpage. You've certainly done your fair share of work this last month, ~140 accounts in 28 days. I think you're doing an excellent job as well. I'll have to find something nice to give you in return when you hit 500 accounts (about a week away at your current rate). Congratulations on your DYKs as well, great work. Paxse (talk) 11:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * My original message at Paxse's talk


 * Well, it's been good working with you, and you certainly deserve a little something for your achievement, :-) And, I started at ACC only 2 weeks after you and it was nice having someone else "newish" and active around, who was also on IRC.  Thank you for your kind words; I only have one DYK so far, but I hope to work on more once I'm finally done torturing myself at List of female tennis players!  Anyway, I'm glad you appreciate the barnster, :-)  Maedin \talk 13:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm going mad at DYK at the moment - I'm trying to expand one article per day and get it on the front page. The pace is killing me! Cheers, Paxse (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your help
Firstly thanks so much for your nice welcome message and for your help with creating subpages! It is easy and works perfectly. Your userpage is beautiful!!! Wow! All these userboxes, tables, colours, links, pages. I am jealous, I wish I could improve my userpages a little too. Just for my interest, why don't you create tabs? If I understand correctly this can be done (maybe I'm talking rubbish...)

Besides, there are so many things I'd like to learn/edit on wikipedia. It is all so confusing for me. Anyway today I made a small "contribution" to, of all people: Tony Blair!

If you have some good tips for me please leave a message on my user page. Thanks a mill. --Josh Is Dead (talk) 23:19, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * BTW and sorry for the intrusion: the space between the left-hand side (what I believe you call) container on your user page and the middle container is larger than the space between the middle one and the right-hand side one (wow, there is simple sentence).--Josh Is Dead (talk) 23:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * My response at Josh Is Dead's talk

The Divine Service Foundation
Hello, I would like someone to help me understand why this was deleted from my contribution. The Divine Service Foundation is a listed and charted charity in Pennsylvania, United States. I do not consider this as a service asking for money nor did it say that in the contribution begging or asking for money or any thing, but only stating what it was and how it came about. Whom had the right to delete this? Maybe you can help me out here ok? Floyd


 * Hi Floyd! I'm glad you were nicer to me than you were to Jimfbleak, :-)  I wish I could help, but I am not an administrator, which means, unfortunately, that I don't have access to deleted content.  I can't see the article in your contributions, nor can I see the deleted article.  I won't be able to look at it and perhaps point out what parts of it might have been advertising.  I see that you haven't had a response yet from Jimfbleak with his reasons for deleting it, and it may be that he just hasn't got around to it yet.  On the other hand, you didn't exactly ask him for an explanation, just made a few unhelpful comments!


 * Perhaps I can suggest you contact SoWhy; he's a very helpful administrator who will probably be willing to look at the deleted article and explain what about it was advertising. Wikipedia has very strict rules because we strive to be neutral, which you have to admit is a good thing for an encyclopaedia, :-)


 * One last thing: whenever you post on a user's talk page (like mine, or SoWhy's) or on an article's discussion page, please remember to type ~ at the end of your comment. It will "sign" your post, and it will make it much easier for people to identify you and correspond with you.


 * Good luck!  Mae din \talk 07:40, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Sloth
Sorry, it was a mistake, that page is vandalized so often that one gets confused, when restoring vandalism. That page should be protected.

Warrington (talk) 08:50, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * My response at Warrington's talk

RFA
Dear Julie, slightly belated post holiday thanks for your support in both my RFAs, the second of which was successful, The full Oscar acceptance speech version of my Thankspam is here, its best viewed by reading out loud in the style of Ms Winslett :-)  Were Spiel  Chequers  00:46, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Good choice, I really like Kate Winslet! Thank you for the message and you're welcome; I'm pleased to see that you made it! :-)   Mae din \talk 07:43, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Curious
What brought you to the UK? Surely with the pound as devalued and useless as it currently is, it isn't particularly inviting at the moment. :-) And call me a wikistalker, but I saw your LJ (hey you did link it to your userpage!), and I'm confused: Are you or are you not a Leo? Not that I believe in any of that stuff. It just sounded intriguing that your pages contradicted each other. Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 10:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I did something intriguing? Blimey, how did I manage that?!  I didn't mean to be confusing.  I was born late July so that "astrologically" makes me a Leo, but I never seem to fit those "profiles" that you read on dodgy astrology websites.  I don't set much store by any of it, anyway, but I mention my zodiac sign because some people use it as a way to "identify" people.  Which is also why I sometimes feel the need to point out that it doesn't fit me very well.  I know, I could just not mention it altogether, right?


 * As for the UK—well, I've been here for a while now. Six and a half years ago the pound was doing great!  And getting better, too.  All was looking rosy at the time.  Although comparitive economy certainly isn't the reason that I moved.  I wanted to be in a better position to travel, particularly within Europe, and I've always been a bit of an anglophile.  There are other reasons, too, some of them too personal to publicly proclaim, :-)  The grand ideas about travelling have had to take a good kick from reality due to money constraints, but I still have hope!  I guess from the absence of question on the subject that you have worked out my original citizenship.  I try to avoid giving that away, so I've slipped somewhere.  We'll keep quiet, shall we?


 * It's obvious that you've been around a fair bit; your list of countries is impressive. I'm extremely envious!  Any particular reason you're settling in London at the moment?  We've already established that the pound isn't making it look very attractive, :-)   Mae din \talk 14:28, 10 March 2009 (UTC)


 * "Blimey"? Either they still say that down in the West Country, or you're trying far too hard to fit in. :-D Just kidding. I have to say, I can't imagine that too many of the sort of people that contribute to Wikipedia actually use astrology to identify you... I'd like to think we have more sense than that! Six years now? Well you have me well and truly beat. I moved to London just over 3 years ago. Among many reasons, some of them were also of the personal variety. Similar reasons are keeping me here now, although not the same reasons that brought me here in the first place, if that makes any sense. Probably not. Intentionally cryptic! But yeah, the UK really is a bit of a travel hub and a great place to launch into trips to the Mainland, although you've probably found, like me, that it doesn't always work out that way, and you tend to fall into the rat race wherever you live! Money constraints is a big one. London is just so damn expensive, and I'm actually an IT contractor, which is the last thing you want to be doing in this economic climate, but for reasons even more complicated and personal, I can't take on a full time job - just contractual (no, I'm not an illegal!) Yeah, I think I've got your nationality figured out. Thats okay, I won't hold it against you. One of the original reasons for moving here was also of that nationality. ;-) So why London? Well, I guess you covered a lot of the reasons. London is the place to be, and certainly where all of the best jobs are (were). I'm certainly not London's greatest fan. Cost of living is really high (certainly compared to where *cough* you and I are from) and it really feels like a bit of a concrete jungle sometimes. Not many birds, trees, etc. It isn't all bad though, but I do think that one day in the near future I will want to go back home. If you've never been to Australia, you should sometime. :-) At times it can feel a bit devoid of history and culture, but on a day-to-day basis, it is a great country to live in. And as for my list of countries, it has barely been updated since I got here! I'm hoping to add to it with a big trip if/when I head home, but I will need to save considerably more before I could justify that! The stock market has ground into a pulp what life-savings I had put away. :-( Talk about bad timing... Oh well, we're still young and we have our health, right? Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 22:22, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Seriously, "blimey" is used down here a lot! It's quite surprising what you can pick up if you actually want to; I've assimilated into the South West so well, mostly without even realising it or trying to.  My British accent is pretty well-developed, also, I just lose it whenever I go back home for a visit, ;-)  I wouldn't mind living in London instead of in farmer country down here, but 3 years or so would probably be my limit, before I had to find a new city or get myself off to the country.  I've been to London quite a few times "on the cheap", as I catch a bus early in the morning and spend the day wandering.  I'd actually have seen more of London, too, if it weren't for those damn museums.  I love museums, but they eat up time!  I never can resist a good museum.


 * At least contractual work gives you flexibility; easy to miss the regular payslips, admittedly, but flexibility is nice, too, :-) IT contracting doesn't sound like such a bad thing with recession present, but as I don't really know what IT contractors do, my opinion isn't worth much.  I've only ever worked where the IT is on-site and full-time.  I'll avoid saying anything further on the subject lest I proceed to air my ignorance.


 * I've never been to Australia, but I would like to go. It's not very high on my list for exactly the reason you mentioned: history and culture.  Which is why the US isn't on my list.  There's too much of what I want on my doorstep with the entire European continent, and that's my first goal.  Australia's nature is still a big attraction for me, though, which is why I have to get there some day, :-)


 * I hope you do get to return (and take a big trip at the same time); maybe it will come sooner than you think. In the meantime, though, you're absolutely correct, we have our youth and health and, despite non-travelling frustrations and non-existant money, things are alright, :-)   Mae din \talk 10:54, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I do find the museums interesting, but it is a shame that they don't incorporate more information with the artifacts they show. I find the best way to approach museums is to learn a lot about what you're about to see, so you can then appreciate it when you see it in the flesh, so to speak. I always wander around and look at all these ancient and interesting things, but find that there is virtually no explanation for what it is I'm looking at, and I tend to zone out a bit. That's why I love Wikipedia. Sure, we're missing quality images for much of what is out there in the museums (I should really get out there with a camera one day to document it all better!), but at least you can learn more than you would from a blind trip to a museum. The British Museum is so full of ancient history, and yet falls so short of my expectations because of that lack of text to accompany it all. The Science Museum and Natural History Museum are better though, I must admit. :-)
 * I think my favourite geeky pastime in London is photographing the architecture and I guess it shows in my Wiki photos. One thing I have noticed is that it tends to stunt my photographic creativity a bit though, since the ideal encyclopaedic view of a building is geometically straight on ;-). I tend not to be that good at portraiture (I am proud of that photo of the Kayan girl in Thailand though) so I stick to photos where I don't have to interact with people too much. I prefer fly-on-the-wall photography! That photo that you took of the young buddhist boy is nice, too.
 * Well, I wouldn't say that contract work is the best way to ride through the recession, since there is a good chance that you could be out of work for long periods of time. Sure, there is a chance of redundancy if you work full time, but the vast majority of people will make it through unscathed. In fact, if you're in a stable full time job, you're more likely to actually benefit from the recession, as interests rates are unbelievably low, shops are discounting, etc etc. What I do is actually pretty similar to full time on site IT support. The only difference is that companies tend to bring you on for projects, or to replace full time staff that are working on projects etc. So I might work somewhere for 3 months or 6 months or whatever, but there usually comes a time to move on. Other than that, I still sort of actual like a regular employee - it isn't as though I'm working somewhere new every day.
 * Yeah, you're right about Australia and the US. I suppose every country has culture and history, though. Even Australia has a fairly interesting and 'colourful' history, albeit brief. It's just that ancient history and culture tends to be more exotic and interesting. I do love the wide open landscapes of the US and Australia. I've been wanting to visit the south-west of the US again for a long time. I love the landscapes of Utah and of course there are plenty of other beautiful National Parks out there that I've never been to, as well. I see that you like hiking too? I do like the landscapes of Britain, but I can't help but be slightly underwhelmed by them compared to the ones I've seen elsewhere, and they are rarely truly wild and unspoilt. ;-) Then again, I'm stuck here in London so what would I know? ;-) Technically I'm not actually in London (although I used to live there). I'm on the London commuter-belt side of Kent, which is fairly uninspiring anyway. So where in Europe have you managed to get to so far? Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 13:26, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, just realised you had a special page dedicated to where you'd been. ;-) Although it seems strangely incomplete.. This mysterious origin of yours doesn't appear in the countries you've lived in....! . Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 14:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Request
I have userfied it User:Maedin/Emily Eavis. Before restoring it to mainspace, please provide sources. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:01, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thank you kindly, Maedin, for taking the time to welcome me to Wikipedia!

Actually, I've been an unregistered user for several years, so I know a little bit already. But I thought I'd finally settle in with a name, and, hopefully, develop a good reputation as an editor! Wish me luck. --Ben Culture (talk) 22:21, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
For the lovely rap (or is it wrap? I've always wondered) on my RfA and for your !vote of confidence. Let me know if there is anything adminny that needs doing or if you need a hand with anything else. I checked out your photos btw, you have a great eye for composition - very nice indeed. Now go and illustrate some articles with your shots! Cheers, Paxse (talk) 14:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

FPC Nom
Please re!vote on this nom. It was relisted and your previous vote no longer counts. Thanks. ~  ωαdεstεr 16  «talkstalk» 05:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Please stop with the templating!
You are deleting Interwiki links to articles on French Wikipedia for tennis players that have no biography on English Wikipedia. This is a VERY bad thing to do! Tennis expert (talk) 21:21, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

What happened to the entry for Dorothy Shepherd-Barron? Tennis expert (talk) 21:23, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I moved Dorothy Shepherd-Barron down to S, that's all. It seemed more appropriate there, as the surname is double-barrelled.  Also, we don't make a practise of linking to French Wikipedia in other articles or lists, why here?  I don't see that they add much in the way of value; a majority of readers will not be able to read French and the links are misleading.  Also, red links do have a purpose, too.  I understand that the French Wikipedia has, in places, more extensive tennis coverage than we do, but I don't think we should encourage linking to it.  Do you have a precedent for this as a standard practise?  The sortname template is a more tailored, suitable way to achieve the alphabetising in a sortable wikitable, and I don't see that the French Wikipedia should prevent us from using it.   Mae din \talk 21:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Then I'm going to revert your templating. The French linking is very important and specifically authorized by Wikipedia policy.  See this.  And we do Interwiki links all the time concerning tennis articles, i.e., it's routine.  Tennis expert (talk) 22:20, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I have worked out how to use the templates and preseve the inline interwiki linking. I assume, therefore, that you have no objection and I will resume the activity.   Mae din \talk 06:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

You realize, don't you, that the template you're adding is so incredibly complicated that almost no one is going to be able to edit the page properly? Tennis expert (talk) 07:39, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, it does seem a little more complicated than it did at first, admittedly! But that aspect wasn't a concern in this discussion, and results tables are more likely to be edited by multiple, various editors (who might struggle with it), than the list itself.  Anyway, if mistakes are made, they can be fixed with no problem.  It's a valid argument that using sortable wikitables is complicated enough already, and that doesn't stop us from using them, and using them to good effect.   Mae din \talk 07:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Sortable Wikitables don't actually need the template, regardless of what another editor may have said. We function just fine in all tennis articles without it.  And I am convinced that the List of female tennis players is going to turn into one humongous mess very soon because no one will understand the template.  Will you still be around to clean-up the article?  Tennis expert (talk) 10:35, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I will, indeed!  Mae din \talk 10:39, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Are you going to finish what you started? This is a case of where the article is worse off with incomplete templating than with no templating at all. Tennis expert (talk) 11:10, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the push, I've been meaning to get around to it! I'll work on it today and this weekend.   Mae din \talk 11:26, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thank you so much for creating my talk page. :) Lyrical Israfel (talk) 16:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

WTA Tour
I'd like your opinion: is it appropriate to call an article on the 1971 Virginia Slims Circuit WTA Tour 1971? Regardless of sponsor, the other yearly articles are called WTA Tour YYYY, but I am not sure whether we would say that the 1971 tour can be considered part of WTA Tour history. Your thoughts? Ordinary Person (talk) 03:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your response.Ordinary Person (talk) 07:13, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Imitation
Hehe, indeed. :) – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 18:43, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Happy 's Day!
For a userbox you can put on your userpage, please see User:Dylan620/Today/Happy Me Day!.
 * My response at Dylan620's talk
 * De nada. :) Not too sunny here, though; I think it might be raining soon. :( --  Dylan 620  Efforts · Toolbox 11:58, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
For this. I don't know where the hell my mind was to not have noticed it was already closed. - ℅ &#10032; ALLST☆R &#10032; echo 09:25, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, no problem! Just happened to see it pop up on my watchlist, :-)  By the way, I like your signature!   Mae din \talk 10:20, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

You too!
Chenzw, Staffwaterboy and I were all on the hit list - I think it's rather cool. About bloody time someone welcomed me too, 3.5 years is a hell of a long time to wait for a welcome template :) Cheers, Paxse (talk) 13:20, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, I did have a welcome after I'd been here for a couple of weeks, but I was pleased to get this one anyway, just because I get so excited when I see the "you have new messages" bar. I even drag the excitement out by not looking right away, :-)  3.5 years is a long time to wait . . . my theory is you've been doing all those DYKs to try and earn a welcome template!  (Just kidding!)   Mae din \talk 15:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Damn! She's rumbled my cunning plan. You're right, I am a complete welcome template hussy. Paxse (talk) 03:23, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Questions about Using Talk Pages
Maedin:

A few days ago I logged in to Wikipedia for the first time, and it seems that you were my welcoming committee. When I tried to ask a few questions, however, I was routed to the user talk page of Roux. Is that because people take turns fielding questions from new logins, and I got caught on the cusp of a shift change?

Yesterday I did my first edits on a page about "Ohlone" Indians, and it raised some questions. I wanted to join the dialogue with the on-going editors of that page, but I cannot find a nice box like the one I am writing in now (after clicking "talk to me" along the left side of your "my talk" page). How, or where, do I click in order to join a developing conversation or to document the reasoning behind a particular edit that I might make? Do I use the 'edit' function to change my 'user talk' page, or that of one of the editors of the article of concern, to an environment in which I can write messages?

Second, there seem to be two ways to build notes and refer them to references. One uses an 'up carrot' that I do not understand. Where do I go for 'notes' building help? (I come from the WISIWIG word processing world, all this markup is really difficult for me; perhaps I am being lazy in not clicking on every one of the myriad forks that lead to canned 'help'.)

Third and last, I gave myself the username "Middle Fork" but now see that the community uses single-word usernames (I probably read why somewhere, but I am not absorbing everything). Does really matter, and if so, can I change Middle Fork to Middlefork now?

Hope I see an answer on my user talk page. Thanks for your help, in advance. Middle Fork (talk) 16:37, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Middle Fork
 * I meant to point this out to you earlier - that funky welcome template you have turned on in your ACC prefs, links to Roux's page. Many of them have this problem actually. That's why I use the vanilla option! Cheers, Paxse (talk) 03:54, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

I read your note
I saw the note that you received my request for help. I look forward to hearing from you. (I would have written this on my own talk page, but that is one of the things that I have not figure out how to do. Middle Fork (talk) 20:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Middle Fork

Thanks and Respects
Hi, Maedin. Thanks for the clear and detailed answers to my newbie questions. I made responses with inset :: over at my talk page, along with a new question about a shorthand you used, for when you have the time. Again, thanks. I so respect you and all the Wikipedia workers. Middle Fork (talk) 22:01, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Learning by Emulation
I am looking at your user page, clicking "edit" so I can see the markup for how you broke your page up into sections. (Duh, its just like any other article.) I got the notice you could be "watching" the intrusion, so thought I would explain.

BTW, I hope you are reading "Wikipedia Revolution." It occurred to me that any newcomer would get alot out of it, to understand the history and development of the etiquitte (or however you spell that word). I ran into some resistance to some removals I made, some really weak references, in one otherwise-good article. So I stayed friendly, shared my ideas directly with the person, Goldenrowley, including my reading of the Wiki directions for quality references, and obtained Goldenrowley's agreement. Now I think we will develop a good relationship, important because he has worked for 3 years on many articles I care about.

Peace, Middle Fork (talk) 17:31, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Happy One Thousand Day!
Congratulations. You have created OVER 1000 accounts on Wikipedia. You are either the a leading light in the ACC team or a terminally ambitious sock master... Either way, well done. :) Cheers, Paxse (talk) 03:58, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * My response at Paxse's talk

FPC discussion
Hi Maedin,

I think it is necessary to publicize the FPC discussion, as most people don't know it is taking place. Not only in the FPC and related pages (VPC, etc.) but also in more central places. We can't fail this oportunity of improving things just for lack of participation. But you know much more than me how to do it properly. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:04, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi Joaquim, sorry it took me so long to work on this. You can see here for the rather rough results of my attempt, :-)   Mae din \talk 14:30, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Fir's talkpage
I highly doubt it was an edit conflict since no one has edited Fir's talk page for over 3 hours nor a software glitch. To me seemed to be trying to stir trouble with Fir. I know when Wikipedia is having issues and it wasn't at the time you posted. Bidgee (talk) 17:14, 23 May 2009 (UTC) I would not be intentionally disruptive, and I have no reason to be. Perhaps I edited an out of date version of the page accidentally. I hadn't noticed that the comment was left some time ago, though, I apologise. I had realised after I saved that the comment was missing and was re-instating it, but you beat me to it.  Mae din \talk 17:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The (apparent) accusation is unfair and unfounded. Maedin has already said it was not intentional -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:17, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I know how Wikipedia's software works and it's not possible to be it. If they had of come out and said they accidentally removed the comment then fine but blaming Wikipedia is like blaming God for the Global Cash Crisis. Bidgee (talk) 17:23, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * But I didn't realise I had accidentally removed the comment, did I? All I could see is that the comment had been deleted in the same diff that my comment was added, and I had no idea how.  If I thought it had been my error, I'd have said so at the time.  See below—it probably was my error.  I'm happy to admit mistakes.  You don't know me, but you could assume good faith!  Thanks, :-)   Mae din \talk 17:28, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I accept that reasoning. I have edited before when an vandal edit was removed but I edited back in when I was going though the diff's but clicked the wrong edit but I never blamed the software since I knew that it was human error rather then a system error. Bidgee (talk) 17:29, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for accepting.  Mae din \talk 17:32, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

For you...
Thank you very much, Wadester, that is as much a surprise as it is welcome, :-)  Mae din \talk 07:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep up the good work :) --Muhammad (talk) 11:30, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Can I join the Maedin fan club too? ;-) No seriously, thanks for starting the review. It seems to be resolving many of the issues that had been bubbling under the surface of FPC for a while. It will remain to be seen exactly how they are implemented, but I'm sure that we'll get there. Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 11:57, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Aww, you guys, you made my heart thump, lol! Thanks to all three of you, I really, really appreciate it. ;-)   Mae din \talk 12:28, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Little icons
I think I have finally figured out a safe way to easily add those top icons on your user page using the top icon template. I took the liberty of adapting your icons to that template (and adding the other two DYK credits I found on this talk page). What do you think? :-)  So Why  12:07, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Hurray, you got it to work, thank you! And thank you for adding those two DYKs, I had completely forgotten about them, :-D.  By the way, happy to hear about your holiday/vacation!  I kept an eye on your user talk, but it was quiet and Amalthea got there first, ;-)  Where did you go for your break?   Mae din \talk 12:37, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Anytime. :-) I went to New York, fascinating place indeed :-D  So Why  12:59, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Method of Communicating with Anonymous Contributors
Hi, Maedin. Hope you are well. I have been contributing in minor ways to a number of articles over the last few weeks, and become a key co-contributor with a long time editor in one article. I have a question. Years ago, before I understood the logic and etiquette of Wikipedia, I read an article and anonymously (not be intention) sent a snarky criticism in on its talk page. I got a return email from someone that challenged me (nicely) to make the article better. I did not follow up until I finally read "Wipipedia Revolution" last month. Now, in two places, I have seen anonymous people leave criticisms, along with good suggestions for fixes, on article "discussion" pages. I would like to send them notes, like the one I received, inviting them to make some of the fixes they suggest. But they do not have their own "talk" pages. Is there a way to contact them that you can tell me?Middle Fork (talk) 22:48, 3 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you, Middle fork, I am doing well, :-) I had noticed what excellent contributions you are making—well done!  I am somewhat confused by your comment about having received an email after posting a message as an IP.  When you left the message on the talk page, did you give your real name or your email address?  I can't think of any other way that an editor could have got your email address.  As for your question, you have a couple of options, but you are right in thinking that they are not guaranteed ways of getting your message to the intended recipient.  You can, of course, just respond to them at the article discussion where they left their message.  Unfortunately, this relies on them actually returning to the page and seeing your response.  You may also respond at the IP's talk page; you can direct your message at a specific poster by referring to the post that they made, using a WP:diff.  Although some IPs are shared by hundreds of multiple users, some are not and are more "exclusive", if you like, so you may find that your messages on the IP's talk do not have as wide an audience as you might think, :-)  Sorry to not have any better answers than that—I know it isn't an ideal situation!   Mae din \talk 07:27, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Maedin, thanks for the clear response. That interaction I described was years ago, so I cannot be sure, but I probably did leave my specific email address with my snarky comment. (Although I have been known to be rude, I have never deliberately been rude anonymously.) I think in the future I will just use the "discussion" page of the article in question to invite a critic to contribute.Middle Fork (talk) 16:08, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Featured_picture_candidates/Review_of_closure_process
Trouble is, there are too many options. Really have to narrow it down if you want people to pick decisively. Noodle snacks (talk) 02:36, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I know there are too many options . . . but this is what has been brought up, and how can I decide which ones to throw out? Granted, there are some "fringe" options which few sign up to, but it could be considered "pointed" to "deliberately" not include them.    I just don't know.  Anyway, I finally saved that damn thing at 1:45 in the morning having worked on it for approximately six hours, and considering how much I love my weekend sleeping, that's saying a lot.  If you or any else thinks there is just too much, then please, slim it down.  I would hate to have not achieved something there just because there was too much choice!  If no one does, then perhaps when I actually care again I will try to myself.   Mae din \talk 08:53, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

FYI, I added another link to it from the FPC talk page. I agree with NS, but removing certain options won't help. If they don't get any support now, we'll discount them completely, but for now it would be responsible to leave them all. Diliff  | (Talk)   (Contribs) 11:29, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Abantiades latipennis
Thanks for the heads up. I spotted the file protection a few hours ago actually. I would have done a DYK myself if I didn't have exams nearby. If you are looking for other DYKs then I'm sure a few insects at User:Noodle_snacks/gallery that have potential. Myrmecia esuriens, Eusthenia, and Common Macrotona come to mind. Some of the others there are identified but don't have articles at all. I suspect you'd be pushing it to get above the DYK minimum length for some of those though. I'm not sure what else you are interested in, but on the basis of information available, Echeveria (and sub articles), Succulent plant, Mycena and Leptospermum (and sub articles) all have potential. Elsewhere Mount Field National Park could be expanded greatly, but you'd be pushing a 5x expansion. Noodle snacks (talk) 07:43, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I think I went there a few years ago to drop off my sister and one of our french students for a rafting trip. I've also rafted to huonville from nearby. It is quite close to the Tahune Airwalk, Tasmania. As the land is managed by forestry I am sure access is possible. I'm not sure where an appropriate nearby viewpoint would be though. I don't think it'd be visible at all from Hartz Mountain. I wouldn't consider it particularly notable. As far as being in the news for logging protests, Styx Valley, Upper Forentine Valley, Tarkine, Wielangta forest and Recherche Bay have been some of the most recent locations in the news. I tried to add you to facebook given your userbox. Difficult to search for a pseudonym there though. You could flick me an email link if you like. Noodle snacks (talk) 13:59, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/Review of closure process
I collapsed all of the beginning discussion up to the poll to make it more navigable. Do we want to start collapsing obviously one-way-or-the-other sections (Bot help, for example) and zoom in on the controversial/debated ones? I don't want this to stagnate.  Spencer T♦ Nominate! 00:35, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, could we collapse sections that aren't supported (Like this) to leave the ones with support remaining?  Spencer T♦ Nominate! 00:37, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Just saw the top of your talk - I'd prefer a small note of response on my talk.  Spencer T♦ Nominate! 00:42, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

I decided to go on now and do survey conclusions. Feel free to take a look.  Spencer T♦ Nominate! 17:13, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

 * Thank you for the warm welcome on my talk page Maedin. :) --Mart572 (talk) 00:05, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh no...
I actually seriously debated whether or not to correct a simple typo on List of films portraying paedophilia or sexual abuse of minors. But then I thought, "Naw...no one's watching." Whelp...apparently someone is. :) Glad you enjoy the edit summaries -- I'm afraid that I always edit here with the mind of the "class clown" who's trying to make the bullies laugh, so they won't beat him up.  It's gotten me this far...  ColorOfSuffering (talk) 22:37, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Nice person
Hi Julie. I am not so long on Wikipedia, so I don't have so many WikiFriends. I've seen your username at the Account Creation interface. You look like a nice person, care to chat a little? Kind regards,  Lourie Pieterse  12:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I need some help
¡Hola Julie! ¿cómo estás?. I need some help with the name of two towns. There are a town in Spain in the province of Girona that his name is Siurana (ca:Siurana), and another in the province of Tarragona that his name is actually Bellmunt del Priorat and years ago, Bellmunt de Siurana. When I search Siurana in this wiki, appears like a town of the province of Tarragona. I move the name from Siurana to Bellmunt del Priorat, but know it's necessarily move Siurana (Alt Empordà) just to Siurana. Thank you. P.S. Please, answer in my talk page. --Xavigivax (talk) 07:43, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * ¡Gracias guapísima! --Xavigivax (talk) 10:01, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * There are some bugs to fix with these articles. When an admin solve the moving, I will edit the articles. --Xavigivax (talk) 10:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi Julie, I'm so sorry! I was trying to solve this mess and did this copyright violations!. I'm not normally connected at weekends, sorry for the answer delay and thank you for fix the problem. --Xavigivax (talk) 07:52, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Problem with ACC
Hi Julie. When I wanted to create an account this morning I've got this error:
 * Login error
 * Visitors to Wikipedia using your IP address have created 6 accounts in the last 24 hours, which is the maximum allowed in this time period. As a result, visitors using this IP address cannot create any more accounts at the moment. If you would like to request an account be created for you, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account.

I've looked at the manual, but could find anything. What should I do? Kind regards,  Lourie Pieterse  09:10, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi Lourie! There is a permission called "Account creator" which allows you to create unlimited accounts.  Without this permission, the creation of accounts is limited to 6 in a 24 hour period.  Generally on ACC, the account creator permission is not granted to a user until they have reached the limit, and an admin can then review the accounts you've created so far.  I suggest that you contact one of the admins who are active on ACC; try Stwalkerster, Prodego, or OverlordQ, just as a start.  If you want a quicker response, you can try the #en-wikipedia-accounts channel on IRC, where they are generally online.  Hope that helps!   Mae din \talk 09:18, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Ah! I see that Promethean is already taking care of it, ;-)  Mae din \talk 09:19, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Hahahaha yes, I just wanted to tell you... Lourie Pieterse  09:33, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiBirthday
I saw from here that it's been exactly one year since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 18:38, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Awww, thank you, I had no idea! Happy birthday to me,    Mae din \talk 19:18, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Time to action
Enough is enough. I trust you will be able to present an honest and accurate summary of the FPC discussion and propose a new text for the guidelines. Please check here -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:19, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure that I can without asking for further input . . . there are still quite a few points which didn't get enough clear participation. We don't need to go back to the drawing board, but I'm not sure we're ready for conclusions.  Well, I'll look into it, but I won't be able to do anything substantial until Tuesday.   Mae din \talk 06:54, 29 June 2009 (UTC)