User talk:Julia james

i have a british press association signed contract, lets be honest here, it is transphobic what you people are doing to me, as i say in my facebook even if i put us in guiness world records book you would still find a reason to disallow me, total transphobia, don't piss in my face tell me its raining

you are transphobic....it is the british press association did the article.....you are very transphobic and they did come to us and research us, we dealt with 4 diff editors...you are on my personal facebook page forever and on my couples page here https://www.facebook.com/wftmc/ ,never want to be included in your wiki ever, you are VERY TRANSPHOBIC..your just like a stupid white racist, to dumb and scared look inside yourself...lie yo yourself buddy, not to me...

are you reallt trying to tell me the british press associatuion the equivelant of the cbc news is not an official news organization wince it wa sonly established in 1870 sumthing....And i tazke high offence at your assinine attempt to say i went to them you you worthless human being...they came to me.....im gonn aadd you to my facebook forever copying y=this article and posting it forever show what you are...
 * Firstly, if there's one thing I'm very definitely not, it's transphobic. Not once in this entire affair have I ever attacked your gender identity — and if you knew anything whatsoever about my edit history you would know that I'm usually the first person to step in to defend transgender people on here when they're facing attacks that actually have anything to do with their gender identity. This is not about your gender at all, and I never said it was: it's about your editing behaviour, and nothing else.
 * Secondly, the sources you showed were not "the British Press Association": they were two clickbait sites and a Fleet Street tabloid and your own social media, none of which are acceptable reliable sources for Wikipedia content. Again, this is not about your gender identity at all, it is about the fact that the sources were and are not reliable news sites.
 * Thirdly, again, we have conflict of interest rules that impose limits on people (regardless of gender identity) adding information about themselves on here. We're an encyclopedia, not a free venue for people to publicize themselves, so writing about yourself in a Wikipedia article is a thing we do not allow.
 * We don't owe you free rein to just do anything you want on here. You have to follow our rules, and the same rules apply regardless of anybody's gender identity. Again, it's not because you're transgender: it's because you're trying to use sources that aren't acceptable as support for your inclusion here, and because even if the correct quality sources do start writing about you in the future it's still not your prerogative to add yourself to Wikipedia articles. That's it, that's all. Nothing to do with your gender identity whatsoever — regardless of whether they're male, female, non-binary, cisgender, transgender, gay, straight, lesbian, bisexual or asexual, everybody still has to follow the same rules about (a) the required quality of sources it takes to support Wikipedia content, and (b) not writing about yourself in a Wikipedia article. Bearcat (talk) 15:03, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks for trying Bearcat.
 * Julia james, you were previously given a welcome with lots of links on it. An important one was Introduction. Before continuing to write offensively, please take some time to examine it and learn a bit more about how to get things added to Wikipedia. --Fæ (talk) 15:33, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

WP:NOTHERE, WP:NPA
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your . Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNo itsJamie Talk