User talk:Julia olszewski/sandbox

General info Reviewing: Julia olszewski Link to draft you're reviewing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JuliaOlszewsk19/sandbox

I'm honestly not sure to which section the article is supposed to add to, but I'm assuming it's being added as a separate section regarding the incorporation of astrology in an art and architectural context. It's wonderfully written and the only suggestion I would have is to keep going and to add more examples! If you can, also add the dates, origin, material, and artist to the picture tags below the image. :) Maybe explain further what a Ikhwān is.

Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? - Yes. Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? - Yes, the article starts clearly and transitions smoothly. Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? - Yes. Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? - No. Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Lead evaluation Content

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic? - Yes. Is the content added up-to-date? - Yes, considering the sources are. Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? - I don't believe there is "missing" content, just content that has not been added yet, since this is the first draft.

Content evaluation Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral? - Yes, it's neutral. Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? - No. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? - No. Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? - No. Just facts and statements about architectural and ceramic design. Tone and balance evaluation Sources and References

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? - Yes. Almost every line has a citation. Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? - Yes, but always room to add more. Are the sources current? - Yes. Check a few links. Do they work? - Yes. All work. Sources and references evaluation Organization

Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? - Yes, very clear. Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? - Not to my knowledge. Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? - Still preliminary, so unsure, but yes for now. Organization evaluation Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? - Yes. The Qusayr' Amra Dome Fresco and the Zodiac Ewer. Are images well-captioned? - They could benefit from descriptions and dates, such as time period, medium, location, etc. Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? - Yes. Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? - They fit with the layout of the article and the items that are being discussed are visually presented in tandem. Images and media evaluation For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above. - I know this is not a new article

Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? - Yes. 5 reliable sources. How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? - The list is a good length if the user is planning to add to it with the second draft. I would suggest 5 more resources to make it a full-length article. Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? - Due to the article being in its preliminary stages, it does lack section headings Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? New Article Evaluation Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? - Definitely, considering art and architecture were not mentioned before, surprisingly, as they are a large part of the culture. What are the strengths of the content added? - More informational coverage of all aspects of Islamic astrology and its prevalence in the culture. How can the content added be improved? - Just keep adding examples! Overall evaluation