User talk:Juliagurr/sandbox

Maddie's Peer Review
All sources are up to date and relevant to the article. A good amount of detail is provided for the background on the relevance of finding hominin footprints. Overall, the article is neutral, though the wording in the introduction is somewhat confusing, and could be revised to present the findings more clearly. The bipedalism discussion seems out of place as part of the second heading, since it is only discussed in relation to hominins. Sentence separation in "Hominins found near Ileret" is confusing and makes the findings hard to understand. Inclusion of "Interactive Human Timeline" link in two different sections seems over-representative, and not totally relevant. Missing information on Dr. Richmond, not sure if it is unavailable maybe? Also, some syntax issues like successive use of dashes and the spelling out of "Doctor" for Dr. were a little distracting from the article. Graphic is helpful to understand the footprints. Overall, this article is supported by good evidence, strong sources, but just needs some polishing. Great organization, and clear presentation of relevant topics. Glackin 1033 (talk) 17:35, 2 November 2018 (UTC)