User talk:JulianOCM

December 2020
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Christon Bank does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision diffs
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! DBaK (talk) 17:39, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, I'm Fayenatic london. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Stephen Timms, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!

Please note that only a small part of what you added to the article could be verified from the single citation that you provided in that case. Also, the use of only a primary source failed to show that the incident was sufficiently notable to be added into the biography.– Fayenatic  L ondon 20:45, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * An anon editor, presumably yourself, has re-added the material with more citations – thank you. However, this still fails to demonstrate that the tweet was notable. – Fayenatic  L ondon 10:23, 7 April 2021 (UTC)