User talk:Julian Crant/sandbox

I don't think that the opening section of the North-South divide requires a lot of work. I think the opening sentence I provided is a bit more specific. The section needs a citation for one section for which I have yet to find an adequate source. That particular sentence is also phrased as a generalization. Beyond this, at least one of the quotations used should be rephrased.

Indie Dixon's Peer Review
Article seems well developed for the most part and I appreciate that. It informs me as the reader with just the right amount of information about the North-South divide and I really like that you included the graphs on the right to physically show how the north and south are divided physically and by GDP etc. I think, if possible, you should expand more on the History and Brandt Line since the sections are a bit underdeveloped; Theories explaining divide should be one of the main topics you expand on. Also, you did a great job with the ‘Defining Development’ so that topic does not need any more work done to it in my opinion. There are a few lines in your introduction, Brandt Line and Digital and technological divide that need to be cited so you do not become subject to plagiarism. A correction need to be done on the article concerning the countries that are labelled as North and South as it seem not all of them are accurately correct. Your sentences are punctuated well for the most part and sentences seem articulated well so to my opinion there aren’t any obvious grammatical issues, but your capitalization of North and South need to be more consistent. Lastly, to double check on the references for some reason all of them were not working when I tried using them. Overall though, I enjoyed your article. Good stuff. Griffyn1987 (talk) 18:38, 12 March 2019 (UTC)