User talk:Julian von Bredow

Disambiguation link notification for January 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Foot whipping, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Captivity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Please don't edit war
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Social justice warrior; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Bacondrum (talk) 23:48, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

New message from Shearonink
Shearonink (talk) 00:03, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Please don't accuse other editors of acting in bad faith
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Social justice warrior. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

Comments like this: "This article is apparently monitored by exactly the people in question in an attempt to control the narrative." are an accusation of bad faith, they make it difficult to collaborate and are antithetical to the collegial atmosphere needed to create a good encyclopedia. Focus on content not other editors.Bacondrum (talk) 01:22, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Social justice warrior, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". You clearly intended a change in meaning.  Doug Weller  talk 13:31, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

August 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Barefoot, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 15:18, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Drmies (talk) 22:03, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 00:30, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * n.b. Sockpuppet investigations/Julian von Bredow, behavioural evidence only ~TNT (she/they • talk) 00:31, 24 August 2021 (UTC)