User talk:Julianadinardo/sandbox

Article Evaluation
I evaluated the article,Prescription Monitoring Program

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Yes.

Is there anything that distracted you? The way the table was organized was very distracting. It didn't provide the information in a concise, visual way.

Is any information out of date? No, it is not out of date.

Is anything missing that could be added? In the table, there are no descriptions of each of the PMP's per state.

What else could be improved? The length and detail of the article.

Is the article neutral? Yes, it is neutral.

Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No.

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? I believe that there should be viewpoints included. This article is very factual. I think it would benefit from having arguments for and against it on the page.

Check a few citations. Do the links work? Yes

Does the source support the claims in the article? Yes

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? No. There is a table that includes a list of programs by state and the sources are not linked to anything. Additionally, they are not included in the citations at the bottom.

Where does the information come from? The information is coming from medical journals.

Are these neutral sources? Yes.

If biased, is that bias noted? Not applicable.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?

How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? Yes, WikiProject Medicine.

How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Not applicable.

Sophia's Peer Review
Hello, I liked the sections in your PMP article about the necessity of and usage of PMP programs. However, I think that it might be useful to provide some background, or a least link to some background, on schedule drug classifications and their importance. Given the importance of the table as a part of your article, I think that this background is essential to fully understand your article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgbroberg (talk • contribs) 01:38, 21 February 2019 (UTC)