User talk:Julichris

Globant
Hi. I see the following as problems.


 * There are url links in the text to associate company websites. This is linkspam, and also against our MoS. Urls should only be in References or External links, but if they are affilates, they shouldn't be there at all. Just one EL to the official main site.
 * you have mentioned every award, but there isn't any reporting of criticism
 * "THE WORLD'S TOP 10 MOST INNOVATIVE COMPANIES IN SOUTH AMERICA". Block capitals is spam, even if you didn't format it that way
 * Your general references are pointless if they are not in-line citations supporting the text. Dumping every reference to the company you can find looks like spam
 * The table which established notability is completely unsourced.
 * Not a reason for deletion, but a bullet list isn't really an article, and looks awful. Write in continuous prose

I'll restore the text here shortly for improvement. You might want to notify interested parties Jimfbleak - talk to me?  19:04, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

It looks better, but I still don't see the point of the "general references" if they are not actually being used as references. You don't need to put in every mention of the company you can find Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:47, 18 November 2014 (UTC)


 * I don't think that you have dealt with the first bullet point above, but otherwise I think you are just going to have to move the article back to userspace and see what happens Jimfbleak - talk to me?  15:30, 19 November 2014 (UTC)