User talk:JulieDole

Salt Lake County Republican Party
Hi, Julie. There were a number of issues with the article as it looked when it was deleted.
 * It did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts or show that it meets the notability guidelines for organisations. It may be notable, but there was nothing to tell us why.
 * It was written in a promotional style. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Using a large font for your party is non-standard and spammy. Contact details have no place in an encyclopaedia, and there should not be urls in the text, only in a "References" or "External links" section
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage of the centre in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

If you decide to recreate, in addition to the guidance above, try to avoid the following pitfalls
 * Don't copy text from a website, even your own, unless it is explicitly public domain. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by your party. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright isn't sufficient.
 * This is a global encyclopaedia, not an on-line newsletter. Your bylaws, forthcoming events and activities etc, are unlikely to be of interest to anyone but your members.
 * Remember that anyone can edit the article.

You may want to look at Republican Party (United States) for ideas. For obvious reasons, it's important that political articles are written strictly from a neutral point of view

I hope this helps, contact me on my talk page if there is anything I haven't made clear,  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  11:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC)