User talk:Julie Tremble

March 2017
 Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Julie Tremble, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 01:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)


 * I will leave suggestions about this in a few minutes. Donner60 (talk) 01:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Julie Tremble. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:57, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Julie Tremble was changed by Julie Tremble (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859898 on 2017-03-13T01:57:03+00:00.


 * Meanwhile, as I was reviewing the deletion options, an administrator User:C.Fred has placed the article for deletion. The template at the top of the page explains this procedure. This should handle the matter. If you have further questions or requests, I am sure C.Fred can answer or respond to them. Thanks for your patience. Donner60 (talk) 02:08, 13 March 2017 (UTC)


 * @Donner60 and Julie Tremble: I did not place the article for deletion; did. That said, the template at the top of the article provides information and links for more about the articles for deletion process. —C.Fred (talk) 02:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)