User talk:Juliehermes

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as the request for a new article about Kelly Richey that you made at Articles for creation, but it appears that what you posted was a direct copy from http://www.kellyrichey.com/bio_kelly.html - we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. Your request has therefore been removed from the page.

If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content in your own words and citing the source. If you believe that what you posted is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you should make the request again. This time make sure that you explicitly comment on the copyright status, ideally with a copy of the permission to release the content under the GFDL and/or a link to the copyright policy of the source that shows it is in the Public domain. Most websites are copyrighted, and it is best to assume that unless it explicitly says otherwise that http://www.kellyrichey.com/bio_kelly.html is as well.

Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.

Kelly Richey
Hold up for a second. I can't get an edit in for you to look at. I keep getting edit conflicts. -- G e n e b 1 9 5 5  Talk / CVU 02:26, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Kelly Richey - reply
First suggestion would be to coordinate communication on the Talk:Kelly_Richey page. It's hard to keep track of conversations when they are split between your user page and mine. When all discussion is on the Kelly page, it's easy to keep track of it. The only problem with doing it this way is you have to check the talk page regularly as you don't get the message banner like you will get when I send you this.

Next, I have to thank you for turning me on to her. I never heard of her before tonight and luckily she has songs on Yahoo! music engine. Only two of her CD's, but just finished the listening to the 2nd and I love her.

Okay, back to the article. I'm Pacific time and won't be on until late for the next three days if at all. Have you worked with wiki tables before? If not, no big deal. Best way to learn something is to find an example of what you want. Maybe we could take a look at other artists that have the cd's done in a table. There's really no standard, so we should be able to find several examples. The other thing that I haven't done is google her for other information. Maybe we could find some more info to flesh out the article without making it look like it's being padded. Maybe finding a featured article or a good article on a lesser known artist would be a good place to go for ideas. Nice to hear from you! -- G e n e b 1 9 5 5  Talk / CVU 04:19, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:KellyRichey.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:KellyRichey.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:13, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Nomination of Kelly Richey for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kelly Richey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kelly Richey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 01:42, 19 October 2011 (UTC)