User talk:Julieritter

August 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Earth Vision has been reverted. Your edit here to Earth Vision was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TLL-7f0_YE) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:54, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Earth Vision
The article Earth Vision has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article was about a real person or group of people, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or an organized event, but did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is actually significant enough for an encyclopedia article, you are free to re-create it, but this time you need to demonstrate that, which is best done by citing to reliable, secondary sources that are entirely unconnected to the topic.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JohnCD (talk) 14:01, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Julie, I'm sorry, but Wikipedia is not a place to host a fictional contest like this. As an encyclopedia, it is selective about subjects for articles. The test for inclusion is called Notability and requires references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject," see also Notability (summary).


 * You could try Wikia, which runs on the same MediaWiki software as Wikipedia, but is much less choosy about content. There are many wikis within Wikia; you could probably find one where you could host your fictional contest, or you could even start your own.


 * If you have not kept a copy of what you posted, I will be happy to email it to you on request. JohnCD (talk) 14:01, 18 August 2016 (UTC)