User talk:Julietibrahim

February 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Juliet Ibrahim, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Juliet Ibrahim was changed by Julietibrahim (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958233 on 2012-02-19T20:03:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello Julietibrahim. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 20:16, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

All caps
Please avoid using all caps in your Juliet Ibrahim article. See wp:allcaps for reference. Also, please avoid "puffery" this is an encyclopedia. See wp:peacock for more information. Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 20:49, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Juliet Ibrahim, you may be blocked from editing. Sorry, but you cannot use Wikipedia to praise yourself -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:51, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Juliet Ibrahim, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. If you fill the article with blatant praise of yourself again, you will be blocked from editing -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:28, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for repeatedly adding non-neutral praise of yourself to your biography. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:59, 19 February 2012 (UTC) Wikipedia articles must be written in a neutral manner, supported by reliable sources. You simply cannot fill your biography with your own puffed-up praise of yourself, like "What was intended as a try out at an audition for one of Ghana’s biggest film production company turned out to be the unearthening of her hidden Acting talent", "She played her role so well with much passion and agility", and "Nollywood gradually became a homestead for the Ghallywood (Ghanaian film industry) Goddess as she moves on from one movie set to the other, exhibiting a great and versatile acting prowess" -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)