User talk:Julihielo3

February 2022
Hello, I'm GoldMiner24. I noticed that you recently removed content from Global Jet Luxembourg without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GoldMiner24 (talk) 10:03, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:GlobalJet Worldwide&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/GlobalJet Worldwide. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Girth Summit  (blether) 17:11, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
 * To explain further: you have reinstated text that was added by an account that appeared to be linked to the subject of the article; I am assuming therefore that you are connected with that account, which is now blocked. WP:PAID, WP:COI and WP:NOTPROMO are all links that you should read through; if you wish to be unblocked, you will need to declare your connection with the subject of that article, and indicate your understanding of the expectations of editors who have a conflict of interest with the subjects they are writing about. Thank you. Girth Summit  (blether)  17:14, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello Girth, I am Julie, this is my first account from wikipedia ... I really do not understand why you blocked this account. I used to work with Global Jet and I am based in Luxembourg, please note that I changed the page, as I explained that information there are wrong. First of all, the name Igor Shuvalov is not related to Global Jet, he is not a client of Global Jet but of another business jet company. The number of aircraft for the fleet is also wrong, you have to understand that global jet is a group and not only linked to luxembourg, aircraft type and number are not correct and is changing every month. Please note that Operating bases is not Luxembourg as aircraft are based all over the world. Global jet is not doing also leasing for aircraft ... Most of the information related in your current page are inaccurate, that's why I tried to modify in order to show the reality ...


 * As I noted above, you changed the article in ways that were identical to the content that previously blocked accounts had added. This is discussed at WP:MEAT. Another admin will review your unblock request. Girth Summit  (blether)  09:54, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello Girth, many thanks for your quick reply. Effectively I put exactly the same text that was put in wikipedia by monique few days ago, another person that I know. I remain at your entire disposal if you need more details. I was just trying to correct the data you have there... Could you please then let me know how to put correct information???
 * OK, so if you are acting in conjunction with a third party who is already blocked, that is exactly the situation that WP:MEAT describes, and we are not going to unblock you so that you can continue doing it. None of you should be editing the article, because you have a conflict of interest - the text you wrote was exceedingly promotional, and entirely inappropriate for an encyclopedia entry. I recognise that the current entry may be a little out of date, and there is a particular sentence that I myself think probably doesn't belong there, but the answer to that is not for people connected to the subject to try to turn our article about it into an advert. Girth Summit  (blether)  15:25, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Ok so it is better to put information that are totally wrong. At least remove the name of Mr Igor... as it is not a client of Global Jet but he is with a competitor of global jet, and put a sentence for the aircraft list to say that aircraft number can be changed according to the in and out, currently it is not at all up to date. Change also from luxembourg bases to worldwilde, as no aircraft are based in Luxembourg. In the current text 60% are wrong. Could you please also change date of creation which is 1998 and not 1999.
 * We are not going to accept any proposals for changes based on someone's personal experience. If you are aware of reliable sources, which are independent of the company and which would support the assertions you're making, I'd be prepared to consider posting links to them on the article talk page for other editors to evaluate. Girth Summit  (blether)  17:02, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

You can contact the DAC (civil aviation), you can contact the chamber of commerce.... and you can easily proved the date of creation, bases of aircraft and number of aircraft as well as client. I think, legally speaking it is very dangerous to decide to relate fake information instead of taking into consideration the relevant one. At the opposite, information that are written now does not have any reliable sources as there are wrong. Furthermore you are not complying with GDPR rules. If you are an encyclopedia as you mention, your first role is to be sure about the accuracy of the information you provide, which is not the case.
 * Some more reading for you: WP:NLT explains why legal threats are not permitted on this platform. If you believe that we are in breach of some regulation or other, you need to take that up with WMF Legal. Volunteers like myself (and everyone else you might interact with here) are neither equipped nor permitted to discuss legal matters on behalf of the WMF. If you continue making legalistic arguments, you will likely find that your ability to edit this talk page is revoked.
 * Next up: WP:OR. We do not perform original research when writing articles. Contacting relevant authorities for confirmation on any point would be considered original research. Again, as an encyclopedia (a tertiary source of information), we summarise reliably published secondary sources. So no, I'm not going to run around contacting authorities trying to fact check anything.
 * Don't get me wrong - that article is very bad. The sourcing is thin, the information is very scant, and I tend to agree with you that the stuff about a specific businessman, and wealthy Russians in general, is WP:UNDUE - I've already proposed trimming that sentence from the article on its talk page. To be honest, I'm not sure that the business is actually notable, as the subject is defined here - there don't seem to be many available sources covering it. I'm not going to make that determination however.
 * So, again - if you know of any reliable secondary sources covering the subject, feel free to post links to them here. If you wish to pursue legal remedies, that is your right, but you will not be permitted to edit here while you do so. If you are unaware of any reliable secondary sources, and just want to tell me what you happen to know to be true, I don't think I'll be able to help you much. Best Girth Summit  (blether)  19:15, 15 February 2022 (UTC)