User talk:JulioISalazarG

Welcome!
Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 03:38, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Assembly theory, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 02:37, 14 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, it was me who added the content that I deleted because it had mistakes in references. JulioISalazarG (talk) 03:21, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

March 2024
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Assembly theory, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 15:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia house style
Hi. A couple comments about this edit: first, Wikipedia articles generally do not use titles like "Dr." or "Prof."; see the Manual of Style. Second, it appears that you have duplicated some material that was present earlier in the article. The Hazen et al. paper is currently both reference 9 and reference 16, for example. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 02:35, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Correct. Hazen et al. peer-reviewed paper is already referenced in the Background section of the Assembly theory article. JulioISalazarG is engaged in an edit war and is disruptively trying to reference this paper twice in this article. Guswen (talk) 10:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Assembly theory. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Guswen (talk) 10:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.