User talk:JulioOrtega

St. Martin Unity Flag moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, St. Martin Unity Flag, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. In addition, it needs more in-depth sourcing to show that it passes WP:GNG. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:27, 5 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Onel5969, thank you for the interest shown in the article I created, "St. Martin Unity Flag." Kindly note that the 21 references reflected both news media and book sources, authoritative and primary sources. If I may point out, the Wiki article “Unification of Saint Martin”--which one reviewer suggested that I add my lengthier material, which would be unacceptable given the work, comparatively, put into my article-- includes 6 references, 0 further reading, 0 external links. A similar Wiki article, "Morning Star flag" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morning_Star_flag includes 18 references, 2 further reading, 1 external links. On the other hand, the "St. Martin Unity Flag" article that you "indicated needs more in-depth sourcing to show that it passes WP:GNG," includes 21 references, 12 further reading, 3 external links [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:St._Martin_Unity_Flag
 * ]. I do hope there is not some form of bias or poor oversight at work in this matter. It appears as well that the "St. Martin Unity Flag" article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:St._Martin_Unity_Flag has been deleted. This is rather unfortunate. Sincerely. JulioOrtega (talk) 08:48, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kamau Brathwaite drawing by Fay Helfer LIVITICUS cover HouseOfNehesiPublishers 2017.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Kamau Brathwaite drawing by Fay Helfer LIVITICUS cover HouseOfNehesiPublishers 2017.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 07:37, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:St. Martin Unity Flag
Hello, JulioOrtega. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:St. Martin Unity Flag, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello FireflyBot (talk), please see following "reply" related to the Draft:St. Martin Unity Flag, a page that I created:  Hi Onel5969, thank you for the interest shown in the article I created, "St. Martin Unity Flag." Kindly note that the 21 references reflected both news media and book sources, authoritative and primary sources. If I may point out, the Wiki article “Unification of Saint Martin”--which one reviewer suggested that I add my lengthier material, which  would be unacceptable given the work, comparatively, put into my article-- includes 6 references, 0 further reading, 0 external links. A similar Wiki article, "Morning Star flag" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morning_Star_flag includes 18 references, 2 further reading, 1 external links. On the other hand, the "St. Martin Unity Flag" article that you "indicated needs more in-depth sourcing to show that it passes WP:GNG," includes 21 references, 12 further reading, 3 external links [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:St._Martin_Unity_Flag
 * ]. I do hope there is not some form of bias or poor oversight at work in this matter. It appears as well that the "St. Martin Unity Flag" article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:St._Martin_Unity_Flag has been deleted. This is rather unfortunate. Sincerely. JulioOrtega (talk) 08:50, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: St. Martin Unity Flag (November 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:St. Martin Unity Flag and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:St._Martin_Unity_Flag Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vanderwaalforces&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:St._Martin_Unity_Flag reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:16, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)