User talk:Juliobicicleta

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Materialscientist (talk) 02:41, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I can not verify the Wall Street Journal source (subscription required); does it say one of the most corrupted countries? How did they measure it? This map does present some measure, yet it disagrees with your statement, which is a strong claim against entire nation. Anyway "if Fernandez plans to run for president again in 2016" is violation of WP:CRYSTAL, a speculation, no matter who said that. Materialscientist (talk) 03:15, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * so, if yourself cannot check it, it is invalid for everyone else? I am new to this. I will reword it properly. I did not know about that rule. Also, the article does states what I wrote. Also, last part is even in another article about the Dominican Republic if you read it. Also, the beginning of the sentence of that paragraph says that most Dominicans are like of him, how can that be valid or measured or fact checked?
 * Subscription requirement is a nuisance, but it is tolerated on wikipedia (other editors can check those sources). However, there is no reason to add speculations on the 2016 elections and on "one of the most corrupted countries". The latter is a claim too strong, and it contradicts to the corruption index that I've linked above, which is rather respectable. The link that you added is well respectable too, but it does not say what you said - there are dozens of countries with worse corruption. Corruption accusations on Leonel Fernández are tricky because of WP:BLP, i.e. they must be backed up by major reliable sources. Also, see WP:SYNTH. Materialscientist (talk) 07:20, 16 January 2013 (UTC)