User talk:Juliox1994

November 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Latinx, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. signed,Rosguill talk 23:22, 28 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Additionally, please do not mark edits as "minor" unless they are actually minor (see WP:MINOR for examples). Using the minor-edit option to attempt to hide potentially controversial changes, as you have now done twice at Latinx, is a form of gaming the system and may result in being blocked from editing. signed,Rosguill talk 23:25, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I didn't add minor for such reasons. I added minor because it followed the idea that was encompassed in the paragraph (of latinx being offensive). I am currently adding it again, this time as a stand alone paragraph with sources. Juliox1994 (talk) 23:39, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Since I deemed it a minor edit, I didn't thought it was necessary to add a source. I will edit it again with the corresponding sources. Juliox1994 (talk) 23:40, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Edited it again with its corresponding reference, please let me know if the edit is correct. Juliox1994 (talk) 00:18, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I think there's 2 issues with the edit: you accidentally copied the Hector Luis Alamo paragraph in two places, and the Manomagazine paragraph doesn't add anything to the article. With regards to the latter, it just repeats the argument already made by Alamo, and Manomagazine isn't exactly a top-tier WP:RS whose perspective demands inclusion regardless of originality. Incidentally, the Alamo paragraph claims that Alamo is a senior editor of Latino Rebels but I don't see that in either of the cited sources (also probably not really RS-tier here--ideally, we should be citing peer-reviewed academic articles here. Google Scholar is a good search engine for searching such sources). I'm not going to step in just yet because there's other articles I'd rather work on editing, but I don't think the edit is an improvement. signed,Rosguill talk 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, I'd direct further discussion of the article's content to Talk:Latinx, as there's a fair number of editors who actively watch the article. signed,Rosguill talk 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh the copied paragraph was a mistake, I was using the reference syntax as an example and copied it near my edit to have it easily visible.
 * The reason why I added that latinx is being used as a slur, is because there is a palpable sentiment of such in various places such as twitter, reddit, and other latino communities across South America. Juliox1994 (talk) 17:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)