User talk:JuliusRa

Welcome!
Hello, JuliusRa, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

I am sorry to have removed what you added to Violeta Urmana: it reads like copied from somewhere, which is strictly forbidden. Please use neutral language, and supply an independent reference for every fact. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:15, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

I now found the wording on her personal website, and all who copy from there. Not so Wikipedia, please understand. You have to speak in your own words, and supply independent coverage. The website of the subject is of course not independent, nor copies from there. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:59, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Dear Gerda, I have received this texts personally from Violeta Urmana. We wrote it by ourselfs and would like to change this information on Wikipedia, because there is the information which is not correct and should be updated. Im new here and do not know how it works. If you get this message from me, please reply. Thank you

You are new here
Please reply here below: do you understand what I wrote above? Copying from the subject is a copyright violation, and Wikipedia is strict about it. If you were not knew, you would get reported, for copyright violation, and for edit warring, because when you are reverted, you should discuss, not put it back. Consider to revert/undo what you did last. Do you understand? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:05, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Dear Gerda, I have received this texts personally from Violeta Urmana. We wrote it by ourselfs and would like to change this information on Wikipedia, because there is the information which is not correct and should be updated. Im new here and do not know how it works. If you get this message from me, please reply. Thank you


 * Dear JuliusRa. I am now in the process of cleaning up the article. I am removing or rewriting the material you added:
 * It doesn't matter who provided the text. If it copies material from her website, it is still a copyright violation and not allowed here.
 * It was also full of puffery and read like an advertisement which is not allowed here.
 * It was also in poor English
 * It also made many assertions abut the subject with no independent verification which is not allowed here.
 * I am also leave you some guidance below about editing with a conflict of interest. Please read it and abide by it, especially if you are an employee of Violeta Urmana or working for her publicists. Voceditenore (talk) 06:33, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Dear Veceditenore, Thank you very much for you explanation. I'm sorry to make you troubles. Is there anything I can help you to revert it back? Maybe if my new information provided here is helpful, you could update it according your own opinion?
 * Hello JuliusRa. Thank you for getting back to me. I'm afraid it will not be reverted back to what you had. It was in poor English, written like an advertisement and had no references for the assertions made. I will continue expanding and improving the article next week, following English Wikipedia's article guidelines and referencing requirements. You may suggest edits on Talk:Violeta Urmana. However, if they are inappropriate and/or lack a reference to a reliable independent source to support them, they will not be added to the article. Voceditenore (talk) 10:18, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Guidance on editing with a conflict of interest and paid editing
Hello, JuliusRa. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Violeta Urmana, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 06:33, 8 June 2018 (UTC)